全基因组测序支持ctDNA测序用于乳腺癌检测。

IF 56.7 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
I. Garcia-Murillas , C.W. Abbott , R.J. Cutts , S.M. Boyle , J. Pugh , K.C. Keough , B. Li , R.M. Pyke , F.C.P. Navarro , R.O. Chen , K. Dunne , C. Bunce , S.R.D. Johnston , A. Ring , S. Russell , A. Evans , A. Skene , I.E. Smith , N.C. Turner
{"title":"全基因组测序支持ctDNA测序用于乳腺癌检测。","authors":"I. Garcia-Murillas ,&nbsp;C.W. Abbott ,&nbsp;R.J. Cutts ,&nbsp;S.M. Boyle ,&nbsp;J. Pugh ,&nbsp;K.C. Keough ,&nbsp;B. Li ,&nbsp;R.M. Pyke ,&nbsp;F.C.P. Navarro ,&nbsp;R.O. Chen ,&nbsp;K. Dunne ,&nbsp;C. Bunce ,&nbsp;S.R.D. Johnston ,&nbsp;A. Ring ,&nbsp;S. Russell ,&nbsp;A. Evans ,&nbsp;A. Skene ,&nbsp;I.E. Smith ,&nbsp;N.C. Turner","doi":"10.1016/j.annonc.2025.01.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA)-based detection of molecular residual disease (MRD) presents a strategy to identify patients at high risk of relapse. In this article, we profile early breast cancer patients with an ultrasensitive, whole genome sequencing (WGS)-based, tumour-informed ctDNA platform.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>We analysed 617 plasma samples (median 8, range 2-14) from 78 patients (23 triple-negative breast cancer, 35 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, 18 hormone receptor-positive, and 2 unknown). Samples were collected at diagnosis before therapy, cycle 2 of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, post-surgery after neoad’juvant therapy if administered, every 3 months during the first year, and every 6 months thereafter. Plasma DNA was analysed using the NeXT Personal MRD platform, a tumour-informed WGS approach to produce personalized ctDNA sequencing panels tracking a median of 1451 variants per patient. MRD detection was correlated with clinical outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>ctDNA was detected at levels ranging from 2.19 parts per million (PPM) to 204 900 PPM (median 405 PPM), with 39% of all ctDNA detections in the ultra-low range &lt;100 PPM. Of patients with samples at diagnosis, 98% (49/50) had ctDNA detected before treatment. At a median follow-up of 76 months (range 5-118 months), detection of ctDNA was associated with high risk of future relapse (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001; log-rank test) and shortened overall survival (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001) with a median lead time from ctDNA detection to clinical relapse of 15 months (range 0.9-61.5 months). MRD was identified in 100% (11/11) of patients who relapsed, with a median level of ctDNA at first MRD detection of 13.1 PPM. No ctDNA-undetected patients relapsed throughout follow-up (64/64). Comparison with exome-powered MRD detection assays showed improved sensitivity and lead time.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A whole genome-powered MRD assay detected breast cancer relapse with a long lead time over clinical relapse, and was strongly associated with relapse-free survival. Rates of ctDNA detection at diagnosis were higher than those reported with exome-based tumour-informed assays.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8000,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Oncology","volume":"36 6","pages":"Pages 673-681"},"PeriodicalIF":56.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Whole genome sequencing-powered ctDNA sequencing for breast cancer detection\",\"authors\":\"I. Garcia-Murillas ,&nbsp;C.W. Abbott ,&nbsp;R.J. Cutts ,&nbsp;S.M. Boyle ,&nbsp;J. Pugh ,&nbsp;K.C. Keough ,&nbsp;B. Li ,&nbsp;R.M. Pyke ,&nbsp;F.C.P. Navarro ,&nbsp;R.O. Chen ,&nbsp;K. Dunne ,&nbsp;C. Bunce ,&nbsp;S.R.D. Johnston ,&nbsp;A. Ring ,&nbsp;S. Russell ,&nbsp;A. Evans ,&nbsp;A. Skene ,&nbsp;I.E. Smith ,&nbsp;N.C. Turner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.annonc.2025.01.021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA)-based detection of molecular residual disease (MRD) presents a strategy to identify patients at high risk of relapse. In this article, we profile early breast cancer patients with an ultrasensitive, whole genome sequencing (WGS)-based, tumour-informed ctDNA platform.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>We analysed 617 plasma samples (median 8, range 2-14) from 78 patients (23 triple-negative breast cancer, 35 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, 18 hormone receptor-positive, and 2 unknown). Samples were collected at diagnosis before therapy, cycle 2 of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, post-surgery after neoad’juvant therapy if administered, every 3 months during the first year, and every 6 months thereafter. Plasma DNA was analysed using the NeXT Personal MRD platform, a tumour-informed WGS approach to produce personalized ctDNA sequencing panels tracking a median of 1451 variants per patient. MRD detection was correlated with clinical outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>ctDNA was detected at levels ranging from 2.19 parts per million (PPM) to 204 900 PPM (median 405 PPM), with 39% of all ctDNA detections in the ultra-low range &lt;100 PPM. Of patients with samples at diagnosis, 98% (49/50) had ctDNA detected before treatment. At a median follow-up of 76 months (range 5-118 months), detection of ctDNA was associated with high risk of future relapse (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001; log-rank test) and shortened overall survival (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001) with a median lead time from ctDNA detection to clinical relapse of 15 months (range 0.9-61.5 months). MRD was identified in 100% (11/11) of patients who relapsed, with a median level of ctDNA at first MRD detection of 13.1 PPM. No ctDNA-undetected patients relapsed throughout follow-up (64/64). Comparison with exome-powered MRD detection assays showed improved sensitivity and lead time.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A whole genome-powered MRD assay detected breast cancer relapse with a long lead time over clinical relapse, and was strongly associated with relapse-free survival. Rates of ctDNA detection at diagnosis were higher than those reported with exome-based tumour-informed assays.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Oncology\",\"volume\":\"36 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 673-681\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":56.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0923753425000535\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0923753425000535","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基于循环肿瘤DNA (ctDNA)的分子残留病(MRD)检测提出了一种识别复发高风险患者的策略。在这里,我们用一个超灵敏的、基于全基因组测序的、肿瘤知情的ctDNA平台来分析早期乳腺癌患者。方法:我们分析了78例患者的617份血浆样本(中位数8份,范围2-14份)(23例TNBC, 35例HER2+, 18例HR+, 2例未知)。在治疗前诊断、新辅助化疗(NAC)第2周期、手术后新辅助治疗(如给予)、第一年每3个月、之后每6个月采集样本。使用NeXT个人MRD平台分析血浆DNA,这是一种肿瘤信息全基因组测序方法,可产生个性化的ctDNA测序面板,追踪每位患者的中位数1,451个变体。MRD检测与临床结果相关。结果:ctDNA的检测水平从百万分之2.19 (PPM)到204,900 PPM(中位数405 PPM), 39%的ctDNA检测在超低范围内。结论:全基因组驱动的MRD分析检测乳腺癌复发,比临床复发提前很长时间,并且与无复发生存期密切相关。诊断时ctDNA检出率高于基于外显子组的肿瘤检测报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Whole genome sequencing-powered ctDNA sequencing for breast cancer detection

Background

Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA)-based detection of molecular residual disease (MRD) presents a strategy to identify patients at high risk of relapse. In this article, we profile early breast cancer patients with an ultrasensitive, whole genome sequencing (WGS)-based, tumour-informed ctDNA platform.

Materials and methods

We analysed 617 plasma samples (median 8, range 2-14) from 78 patients (23 triple-negative breast cancer, 35 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, 18 hormone receptor-positive, and 2 unknown). Samples were collected at diagnosis before therapy, cycle 2 of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, post-surgery after neoad’juvant therapy if administered, every 3 months during the first year, and every 6 months thereafter. Plasma DNA was analysed using the NeXT Personal MRD platform, a tumour-informed WGS approach to produce personalized ctDNA sequencing panels tracking a median of 1451 variants per patient. MRD detection was correlated with clinical outcomes.

Results

ctDNA was detected at levels ranging from 2.19 parts per million (PPM) to 204 900 PPM (median 405 PPM), with 39% of all ctDNA detections in the ultra-low range <100 PPM. Of patients with samples at diagnosis, 98% (49/50) had ctDNA detected before treatment. At a median follow-up of 76 months (range 5-118 months), detection of ctDNA was associated with high risk of future relapse (P < 0.0001; log-rank test) and shortened overall survival (P < 0.0001) with a median lead time from ctDNA detection to clinical relapse of 15 months (range 0.9-61.5 months). MRD was identified in 100% (11/11) of patients who relapsed, with a median level of ctDNA at first MRD detection of 13.1 PPM. No ctDNA-undetected patients relapsed throughout follow-up (64/64). Comparison with exome-powered MRD detection assays showed improved sensitivity and lead time.

Conclusions

A whole genome-powered MRD assay detected breast cancer relapse with a long lead time over clinical relapse, and was strongly associated with relapse-free survival. Rates of ctDNA detection at diagnosis were higher than those reported with exome-based tumour-informed assays.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Oncology
Annals of Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
63.90
自引率
1.00%
发文量
3712
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Oncology, the official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology and the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology, offers rapid and efficient peer-reviewed publications on innovative cancer treatments and translational research in oncology and precision medicine. The journal primarily focuses on areas such as systemic anticancer therapy, with a specific emphasis on molecular targeted agents and new immune therapies. We also welcome randomized trials, including negative results, as well as top-level guidelines. Additionally, we encourage submissions in emerging fields that are crucial to personalized medicine, such as molecular pathology, bioinformatics, modern statistics, and biotechnologies. Manuscripts related to radiotherapy, surgery, and pediatrics will be considered if they demonstrate a clear interaction with any of the aforementioned fields or if they present groundbreaking findings. Our international editorial board comprises renowned experts who are leaders in their respective fields. Through Annals of Oncology, we strive to provide the most effective communication on the dynamic and ever-evolving global oncology landscape.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信