{"title":"重症监护病房患者中耐多药微生物的患病率和随后的菌血症率:一项为期5年的研究。","authors":"Moncompu Subramanian Ramachandran, Indunil Sandaradura, Vineet Nayyar","doi":"10.5114/ait.2024.146641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Multidrug-resistant organism (MRO) bacteraemia is associated with significant mortality. A limited number of studies have examined the relationship between MRO colonisation and subsequent bacteraemia in critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>All patients with a positive surveillance swab result and a positive blood culture result for MROs admitted to the Westmead intensive care unit (ICU) between 1 January 2014 and 31 March 2019 had their results matched with ICU data extracted from the ICU database and analysed for the risk of bacteraemia among swab positive patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 3,878 (2,388 males, 1,490 females) assessable admissions during the period. The median APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) score was 17. A total of 9,681 swab results were collected from 3,878 patients. Of the 3,878 patients, 818 were positive for MROs, and 3,060 were negative. Thirty-two swab positive patients (3.9%) tested positive for MROs in the blood culture, and 16 (0.52%) in the swab negative group had MROs in their blood cultures. This difference was statistically significant (adjusted [adj] OR 6.33; 95% CI: 3.40-11.76). The swab positive group was also associated with a significantly higher positive blood culture with orga-nisms other than MROs than the swab negatives (11.1% and 6.2%, respectively, adj OR 1.37; 95% CI: 1.04-1.82). The overall mortality was higher in swab positive compared to swab negative patients (20.7% vs. 13.1%, P < 0.001). The overall prevalence of MRO colonisation was 21% in our cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The risk of MRO bacteraemia was higher among patients with a positive surveillance swab result for the organism compared to those with a negative swab, but this was not associated with higher mortality in that group.</p>","PeriodicalId":7750,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","volume":"56 5","pages":"277-284"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11781307/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms in intensive care unit patients and rate of subsequent bacteraemia: a 5-year study.\",\"authors\":\"Moncompu Subramanian Ramachandran, Indunil Sandaradura, Vineet Nayyar\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/ait.2024.146641\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Multidrug-resistant organism (MRO) bacteraemia is associated with significant mortality. A limited number of studies have examined the relationship between MRO colonisation and subsequent bacteraemia in critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>All patients with a positive surveillance swab result and a positive blood culture result for MROs admitted to the Westmead intensive care unit (ICU) between 1 January 2014 and 31 March 2019 had their results matched with ICU data extracted from the ICU database and analysed for the risk of bacteraemia among swab positive patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 3,878 (2,388 males, 1,490 females) assessable admissions during the period. The median APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) score was 17. A total of 9,681 swab results were collected from 3,878 patients. Of the 3,878 patients, 818 were positive for MROs, and 3,060 were negative. Thirty-two swab positive patients (3.9%) tested positive for MROs in the blood culture, and 16 (0.52%) in the swab negative group had MROs in their blood cultures. This difference was statistically significant (adjusted [adj] OR 6.33; 95% CI: 3.40-11.76). The swab positive group was also associated with a significantly higher positive blood culture with orga-nisms other than MROs than the swab negatives (11.1% and 6.2%, respectively, adj OR 1.37; 95% CI: 1.04-1.82). The overall mortality was higher in swab positive compared to swab negative patients (20.7% vs. 13.1%, P < 0.001). The overall prevalence of MRO colonisation was 21% in our cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The risk of MRO bacteraemia was higher among patients with a positive surveillance swab result for the organism compared to those with a negative swab, but this was not associated with higher mortality in that group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy\",\"volume\":\"56 5\",\"pages\":\"277-284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11781307/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/ait.2024.146641\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ait.2024.146641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
多药耐药菌血症(MRO)与显著的死亡率相关。有限数量的研究已经检查了MRO定植与危重患者随后的菌血症之间的关系。材料和方法:2014年1月1日至2019年3月31日期间入住韦斯特米德重症监护病房(ICU)的所有监测拭子结果阳性和mro血培养结果阳性的患者的结果与从ICU数据库中提取的ICU数据相匹配,并分析拭子阳性患者的菌血症风险。结果:在此期间有3878例可评估入院(男性2388例,女性1490例)。APACHE II(急性生理和慢性健康评估)评分中位数为17分。从3878名患者中共收集了9681份拭子结果。在3878例患者中,818例mri阳性,3060例阴性。32例拭子阳性患者(3.9%)血培养mro阳性,16例拭子阴性患者(0.52%)血培养mro阳性。这一差异具有统计学意义(调整[adj] OR 6.33;95% ci: 3.40-11.76)。与拭子阴性组相比,拭子阳性组与mro以外的其他生物的阳性血培养也显著更高(分别为11.1%和6.2%,adj OR 1.37;95% ci: 1.04-1.82)。拭子阳性患者的总死亡率高于拭子阴性患者(20.7%对13.1%,P < 0.001)。在我们的队列中,MRO定植的总体患病率为21%。结论:MRO菌血症监测拭子结果阳性的患者比拭子结果阴性的患者发生MRO菌血症的风险更高,但这与该组较高的死亡率无关。
Prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms in intensive care unit patients and rate of subsequent bacteraemia: a 5-year study.
Introduction: Multidrug-resistant organism (MRO) bacteraemia is associated with significant mortality. A limited number of studies have examined the relationship between MRO colonisation and subsequent bacteraemia in critically ill patients.
Material and methods: All patients with a positive surveillance swab result and a positive blood culture result for MROs admitted to the Westmead intensive care unit (ICU) between 1 January 2014 and 31 March 2019 had their results matched with ICU data extracted from the ICU database and analysed for the risk of bacteraemia among swab positive patients.
Results: There were 3,878 (2,388 males, 1,490 females) assessable admissions during the period. The median APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) score was 17. A total of 9,681 swab results were collected from 3,878 patients. Of the 3,878 patients, 818 were positive for MROs, and 3,060 were negative. Thirty-two swab positive patients (3.9%) tested positive for MROs in the blood culture, and 16 (0.52%) in the swab negative group had MROs in their blood cultures. This difference was statistically significant (adjusted [adj] OR 6.33; 95% CI: 3.40-11.76). The swab positive group was also associated with a significantly higher positive blood culture with orga-nisms other than MROs than the swab negatives (11.1% and 6.2%, respectively, adj OR 1.37; 95% CI: 1.04-1.82). The overall mortality was higher in swab positive compared to swab negative patients (20.7% vs. 13.1%, P < 0.001). The overall prevalence of MRO colonisation was 21% in our cohort.
Conclusions: The risk of MRO bacteraemia was higher among patients with a positive surveillance swab result for the organism compared to those with a negative swab, but this was not associated with higher mortality in that group.