腋窝处臂丛超声显像的最佳臂位研究。

IF 1.6 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Shruti S Patil, Kiran A Gaikwad, Preeti S Rustagi
{"title":"腋窝处臂丛超声显像的最佳臂位研究。","authors":"Shruti S Patil, Kiran A Gaikwad, Preeti S Rustagi","doi":"10.5114/ait.2024.145197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Visualisation and separate blockade of the four primary constituent nerves (radial, median, ulnar, musculocutaneous) increases the success rate of ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block at the axillary level. However, the upper limb is still positioned as if performing the landmark-oriented approach described by Winnie, with the shoulder and elbow at 90o. Thus, we aimed to find the optimum arm position for visualisation of the brachial plexus at the axilla using ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>After the Institutional Ethics Committee's approval, this prospective observational study was conducted on 36 consenting individuals more than 18 years of age. The ultrasound probe was placed on a short axis at the intersection of the pectoralis major muscle and the biceps brachii muscle, with just enough probe pressure to cause light compression of veins. Each arm was placed in three different positions - shoulder at 90º and elbow at 90º, shoulder at 90º and elbow at 0º, and shoulder at 120º and elbow at 90º - in which the nerves were assessed using a six-point visibility scale. The path of each nerve was traced down for confirmation. Distance from the skin to axillary artery, skin to individual nerves, and artery to nerves was measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Visibility scores of the individual nerves and the distances measured in the three positions were comparable ( P > 0.05). The skin artery and skin nerve distances were the shortest in the 120/90 position, and the radial nerve was more often located in this position.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Arm position with 120º shoulder and 90º elbow had favourable results. Further studies will confirm its clinical utility and block success rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":7750,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","volume":"56 4","pages":"246-251"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736907/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study of optimum arm position for ultrasound visualisation of the brachial plexus at the axilla.\",\"authors\":\"Shruti S Patil, Kiran A Gaikwad, Preeti S Rustagi\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/ait.2024.145197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Visualisation and separate blockade of the four primary constituent nerves (radial, median, ulnar, musculocutaneous) increases the success rate of ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block at the axillary level. However, the upper limb is still positioned as if performing the landmark-oriented approach described by Winnie, with the shoulder and elbow at 90o. Thus, we aimed to find the optimum arm position for visualisation of the brachial plexus at the axilla using ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>After the Institutional Ethics Committee's approval, this prospective observational study was conducted on 36 consenting individuals more than 18 years of age. The ultrasound probe was placed on a short axis at the intersection of the pectoralis major muscle and the biceps brachii muscle, with just enough probe pressure to cause light compression of veins. Each arm was placed in three different positions - shoulder at 90º and elbow at 90º, shoulder at 90º and elbow at 0º, and shoulder at 120º and elbow at 90º - in which the nerves were assessed using a six-point visibility scale. The path of each nerve was traced down for confirmation. Distance from the skin to axillary artery, skin to individual nerves, and artery to nerves was measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Visibility scores of the individual nerves and the distances measured in the three positions were comparable ( P > 0.05). The skin artery and skin nerve distances were the shortest in the 120/90 position, and the radial nerve was more often located in this position.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Arm position with 120º shoulder and 90º elbow had favourable results. Further studies will confirm its clinical utility and block success rate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy\",\"volume\":\"56 4\",\"pages\":\"246-251\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736907/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/ait.2024.145197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ait.2024.145197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍:四个主要组成神经(桡神经、正中神经、尺神经、肌皮神经)的可视化和单独阻断增加了超声引导下腋窝水平臂丛神经阻滞的成功率。然而,上肢的位置仍然像是在进行Winnie描述的地标定向入路,肩膀和肘关节呈90度。因此,我们的目的是找到最佳的手臂位置,以便在腋窝处使用超声观察臂丛。材料和方法:经机构伦理委员会批准,本前瞻性观察性研究对36名18岁以上的同意个体进行。超声探头置于胸大肌与肱二头肌交会处的短轴上,探头压力恰到好处,可轻微压迫静脉。每只手臂被放置在三个不同的位置——肩膀90度,肘关节90度,肩膀90度,肘关节0度,肩膀120度,肘关节90度——使用六点可见性量表评估神经。每条神经的路径都被追踪下来确认。测量皮肤到腋窝动脉、皮肤到个别神经、动脉到神经的距离。结果:个体神经的可见性评分与三个体位测得的距离具有可比性(P < 0.05)。皮肤动脉与皮肤神经距离在120/90位最短,桡神经多位于此位。结论:120°肩关节和90°肘关节的臂位有良好的效果。进一步的研究将证实其临床应用和阻滞成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Study of optimum arm position for ultrasound visualisation of the brachial plexus at the axilla.

Introduction: Visualisation and separate blockade of the four primary constituent nerves (radial, median, ulnar, musculocutaneous) increases the success rate of ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block at the axillary level. However, the upper limb is still positioned as if performing the landmark-oriented approach described by Winnie, with the shoulder and elbow at 90o. Thus, we aimed to find the optimum arm position for visualisation of the brachial plexus at the axilla using ultrasound.

Material and methods: After the Institutional Ethics Committee's approval, this prospective observational study was conducted on 36 consenting individuals more than 18 years of age. The ultrasound probe was placed on a short axis at the intersection of the pectoralis major muscle and the biceps brachii muscle, with just enough probe pressure to cause light compression of veins. Each arm was placed in three different positions - shoulder at 90º and elbow at 90º, shoulder at 90º and elbow at 0º, and shoulder at 120º and elbow at 90º - in which the nerves were assessed using a six-point visibility scale. The path of each nerve was traced down for confirmation. Distance from the skin to axillary artery, skin to individual nerves, and artery to nerves was measured.

Results: Visibility scores of the individual nerves and the distances measured in the three positions were comparable ( P > 0.05). The skin artery and skin nerve distances were the shortest in the 120/90 position, and the radial nerve was more often located in this position.

Conclusions: Arm position with 120º shoulder and 90º elbow had favourable results. Further studies will confirm its clinical utility and block success rate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信