临床实践指南的传播策略——混合方法证据合成方案

Sumanth Kumbargere Nagraj, Tandekile Lubelwana Hafver, Ameer Hohlfeld, Emmanuel Effa, Denny Mabetha, Gertrude Kunje, Yan Jiao Shen, Carlos Zaror, Suzgika Lakudzala, Talitha Mpando, Stijn van de Velde, Thomas Agoritsas, Nicolas Delvaux, Per Olav Vandvik
{"title":"临床实践指南的传播策略——混合方法证据合成方案","authors":"Sumanth Kumbargere Nagraj,&nbsp;Tandekile Lubelwana Hafver,&nbsp;Ameer Hohlfeld,&nbsp;Emmanuel Effa,&nbsp;Denny Mabetha,&nbsp;Gertrude Kunje,&nbsp;Yan Jiao Shen,&nbsp;Carlos Zaror,&nbsp;Suzgika Lakudzala,&nbsp;Talitha Mpando,&nbsp;Stijn van de Velde,&nbsp;Thomas Agoritsas,&nbsp;Nicolas Delvaux,&nbsp;Per Olav Vandvik","doi":"10.1002/gin2.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are shared through various dissemination strategies using a range of dissemination products and channels. However, users may have different needs for accessing and understanding them. Patients and carers from low- and middle-income countries might face challenges in accessing CPGs such as inadequate systems for printed book distribution and insufficient and substandard photocopies. Many organizations offer lengthy documents, but busy healthcare workers may prefer shorter, digital versions. Digital CPGs can be sent through different channels such as email, newsletters, or social media. How users feel about these products (e.g., clinical protocol, educational material or decision aids) and how it affects the usage of CPGs is not well understood. In addition to these issues, most of the previous systematic reviews on this topic have clubbed the dissemination strategies along with the adoption of recommendations or implementation aspects. There is a need for evidence on the existing dissemination strategies disentangled from the implementation aspects. We aim to conduct a mixed-methods systematic review to identify documented dissemination strategies for CPGs, barriers and facilitators to access such strategies and the expectations and needs of end users regarding dissemination needs. We will search literature from MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, Epistemonikos, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and Medical Guidelines Clearing house. We will critically appraise all the included studies using appropriate tools based on the study design. We will use manifest content analysis to identify documented dissemination strategies and latent content analysis to understand the barriers, facilitators, preferences of end-users. We intend to follow the convergent matrix model approach for this mixed methods evidence synthesis. We anticipate that this mixed-methods systematic review will highlight the various strategies of dissemination of CPGs and the associated barriers and facilitators.</p>","PeriodicalId":100266,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Public Health Guidelines","volume":"2 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gin2.70012","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dissemination strategies of clinical practice guidelines—mixed methods evidence synthesis protocol\",\"authors\":\"Sumanth Kumbargere Nagraj,&nbsp;Tandekile Lubelwana Hafver,&nbsp;Ameer Hohlfeld,&nbsp;Emmanuel Effa,&nbsp;Denny Mabetha,&nbsp;Gertrude Kunje,&nbsp;Yan Jiao Shen,&nbsp;Carlos Zaror,&nbsp;Suzgika Lakudzala,&nbsp;Talitha Mpando,&nbsp;Stijn van de Velde,&nbsp;Thomas Agoritsas,&nbsp;Nicolas Delvaux,&nbsp;Per Olav Vandvik\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/gin2.70012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are shared through various dissemination strategies using a range of dissemination products and channels. However, users may have different needs for accessing and understanding them. Patients and carers from low- and middle-income countries might face challenges in accessing CPGs such as inadequate systems for printed book distribution and insufficient and substandard photocopies. Many organizations offer lengthy documents, but busy healthcare workers may prefer shorter, digital versions. Digital CPGs can be sent through different channels such as email, newsletters, or social media. How users feel about these products (e.g., clinical protocol, educational material or decision aids) and how it affects the usage of CPGs is not well understood. In addition to these issues, most of the previous systematic reviews on this topic have clubbed the dissemination strategies along with the adoption of recommendations or implementation aspects. There is a need for evidence on the existing dissemination strategies disentangled from the implementation aspects. We aim to conduct a mixed-methods systematic review to identify documented dissemination strategies for CPGs, barriers and facilitators to access such strategies and the expectations and needs of end users regarding dissemination needs. We will search literature from MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, Epistemonikos, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and Medical Guidelines Clearing house. We will critically appraise all the included studies using appropriate tools based on the study design. We will use manifest content analysis to identify documented dissemination strategies and latent content analysis to understand the barriers, facilitators, preferences of end-users. We intend to follow the convergent matrix model approach for this mixed methods evidence synthesis. We anticipate that this mixed-methods systematic review will highlight the various strategies of dissemination of CPGs and the associated barriers and facilitators.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Public Health Guidelines\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gin2.70012\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Public Health Guidelines\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gin2.70012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Public Health Guidelines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gin2.70012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临床实践指南(CPGs)通过使用一系列传播产品和渠道的各种传播策略进行共享。然而,用户在访问和理解它们时可能有不同的需求。低收入和中等收入国家的患者和护理人员在获取CPGs方面可能面临挑战,例如印刷图书分发系统不完善以及复印件不足和不合格。许多组织提供冗长的文档,但忙碌的医疗工作者可能更喜欢较短的数字版本。数字cpg可以通过不同的渠道发送,如电子邮件、时事通讯或社交媒体。用户对这些产品的感受(例如,临床方案、教育材料或决策辅助)以及它如何影响cpg的使用尚不清楚。除了这些问题之外,以前关于这一专题的大多数系统审查都集中讨论了传播战略以及通过建议或执行方面的问题。需要从执行方面分离出来的现有传播战略的证据。我们的目标是进行一项混合方法的系统审查,以确定cpg的文件传播策略,获取这些策略的障碍和促进因素,以及最终用户对传播需求的期望和需求。我们将检索MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, Epistemonikos, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and Medical Guidelines Clearing house的文献。我们将根据研究设计使用适当的工具对所有纳入的研究进行批判性评价。我们将使用显性内容分析来确定文件化的传播策略,并使用潜在内容分析来了解最终用户的障碍、促进因素和偏好。我们打算采用收敛矩阵模型的方法来进行这种混合方法的证据综合。我们预计,这一混合方法的系统综述将突出CPGs传播的各种策略以及相关的障碍和促进因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Dissemination strategies of clinical practice guidelines—mixed methods evidence synthesis protocol

Dissemination strategies of clinical practice guidelines—mixed methods evidence synthesis protocol

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are shared through various dissemination strategies using a range of dissemination products and channels. However, users may have different needs for accessing and understanding them. Patients and carers from low- and middle-income countries might face challenges in accessing CPGs such as inadequate systems for printed book distribution and insufficient and substandard photocopies. Many organizations offer lengthy documents, but busy healthcare workers may prefer shorter, digital versions. Digital CPGs can be sent through different channels such as email, newsletters, or social media. How users feel about these products (e.g., clinical protocol, educational material or decision aids) and how it affects the usage of CPGs is not well understood. In addition to these issues, most of the previous systematic reviews on this topic have clubbed the dissemination strategies along with the adoption of recommendations or implementation aspects. There is a need for evidence on the existing dissemination strategies disentangled from the implementation aspects. We aim to conduct a mixed-methods systematic review to identify documented dissemination strategies for CPGs, barriers and facilitators to access such strategies and the expectations and needs of end users regarding dissemination needs. We will search literature from MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, Epistemonikos, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and Medical Guidelines Clearing house. We will critically appraise all the included studies using appropriate tools based on the study design. We will use manifest content analysis to identify documented dissemination strategies and latent content analysis to understand the barriers, facilitators, preferences of end-users. We intend to follow the convergent matrix model approach for this mixed methods evidence synthesis. We anticipate that this mixed-methods systematic review will highlight the various strategies of dissemination of CPGs and the associated barriers and facilitators.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信