超加工食品特刊

IF 3.4 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Mario Estévez
{"title":"超加工食品特刊","authors":"Mario Estévez","doi":"10.1111/1750-3841.70052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The role played by foods and dietary patterns in human well-being goes beyond the mere nutritional contribution since they influence our physical and mental health, evoke hedonic sensations, and even influence our mood. Health authorities and consumers (and society as a whole) are increasingly concerned about the relationship between the consumption of processed foods (PF) and ultra-processed foods (UPF) on the onset of chronic diseases such as diabesity (type 2 diabetes [T2D] in obese individuals) or some types of cancer. There are well-founded reasons for this concern since (1) diabesity, frequently accompanied by cardiovascular events, is one of the main causes of death in developed countries, and (2) the consumption of UPF has increased exponentially in those countries in the last decade. In the United States, where the prevalence of obesity is above 40% (Phelps et al., <span>2024</span>) and 1 out of 10 people suffer from T2D (Fang et al., <span>2023</span>), the consumption of UPFs consists, on average, of more than 50% of the total energy intake (Touvier et al., <span>2023</span>). The connection between UPF and poor health, however, is not well understood for several reasons. First, the concept of UPF is not well defined, and the renown Nova classification is openly criticized for being inconsistent and based on flawed criteria (Ahrné et al., <span>2024</span>; Petrus et al., <span>2021</span>). Some authors would agree that certain PF/UPF, such as fortified foods or plant-based analogues of animal foods, may not be ascribed as potentially harmful, while others state the potential negative influence on health of these same fabricated foods. In line with this controversy, the correlations based on epidemiological/observational studies do not imply causality, and hence, the precise UPF/food components likely responsible for such poor health are currently unknown. Furthermore, industrial food processing has enabled indisputable advances toward convenience, food safety, and palatability that may be regarded as positive contributions. Bearing all these controversies and challenges in mind, this special issue (SI) was conceived as a platform for food scientists to provide their critical opinion on this hot topic via concise reviews and to publish some original results from innovative studies. This SI may serve as an inspirational set of works from which food scientists may be encouraged to design and carry out more challenging studies aimed to understand the impact of processing on food structure and composition and that, in turn, on nutrition and health outcomes. With newfound, transparent, and scientifically based data, the food industry shall be able to design and produce palatable, and yet, satiating, nutritious, and healthy PF and UPF.</p><p>Sincerely,</p><p>Mario Estévez, DVM, PhD</p><p>Guest Editor, JFS Special Issue: Ultra-Processed Foods</p><p>Scientific Editor, <i>Journal of Food Science</i></p><p>Professor, Universidad de Extremadura, Spain</p>","PeriodicalId":193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science","volume":"90 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1750-3841.70052","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Special issue on ultra-processed foods\",\"authors\":\"Mario Estévez\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1750-3841.70052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The role played by foods and dietary patterns in human well-being goes beyond the mere nutritional contribution since they influence our physical and mental health, evoke hedonic sensations, and even influence our mood. Health authorities and consumers (and society as a whole) are increasingly concerned about the relationship between the consumption of processed foods (PF) and ultra-processed foods (UPF) on the onset of chronic diseases such as diabesity (type 2 diabetes [T2D] in obese individuals) or some types of cancer. There are well-founded reasons for this concern since (1) diabesity, frequently accompanied by cardiovascular events, is one of the main causes of death in developed countries, and (2) the consumption of UPF has increased exponentially in those countries in the last decade. In the United States, where the prevalence of obesity is above 40% (Phelps et al., <span>2024</span>) and 1 out of 10 people suffer from T2D (Fang et al., <span>2023</span>), the consumption of UPFs consists, on average, of more than 50% of the total energy intake (Touvier et al., <span>2023</span>). The connection between UPF and poor health, however, is not well understood for several reasons. First, the concept of UPF is not well defined, and the renown Nova classification is openly criticized for being inconsistent and based on flawed criteria (Ahrné et al., <span>2024</span>; Petrus et al., <span>2021</span>). Some authors would agree that certain PF/UPF, such as fortified foods or plant-based analogues of animal foods, may not be ascribed as potentially harmful, while others state the potential negative influence on health of these same fabricated foods. In line with this controversy, the correlations based on epidemiological/observational studies do not imply causality, and hence, the precise UPF/food components likely responsible for such poor health are currently unknown. Furthermore, industrial food processing has enabled indisputable advances toward convenience, food safety, and palatability that may be regarded as positive contributions. Bearing all these controversies and challenges in mind, this special issue (SI) was conceived as a platform for food scientists to provide their critical opinion on this hot topic via concise reviews and to publish some original results from innovative studies. This SI may serve as an inspirational set of works from which food scientists may be encouraged to design and carry out more challenging studies aimed to understand the impact of processing on food structure and composition and that, in turn, on nutrition and health outcomes. With newfound, transparent, and scientifically based data, the food industry shall be able to design and produce palatable, and yet, satiating, nutritious, and healthy PF and UPF.</p><p>Sincerely,</p><p>Mario Estévez, DVM, PhD</p><p>Guest Editor, JFS Special Issue: Ultra-Processed Foods</p><p>Scientific Editor, <i>Journal of Food Science</i></p><p>Professor, Universidad de Extremadura, Spain</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Food Science\",\"volume\":\"90 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1750-3841.70052\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Food Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.70052\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.70052","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

食物和饮食模式在人类健康中所扮演的角色不仅仅是营养方面的贡献,因为它们影响我们的身心健康,唤起快乐的感觉,甚至影响我们的情绪。卫生当局和消费者(以及整个社会)越来越关注加工食品(PF)和超加工食品(UPF)的消费与慢性疾病(如糖尿病(肥胖个体的2型糖尿病[T2D])或某些类型的癌症)发病之间的关系。这种担忧有充分的理由,因为(1)糖尿病经常伴有心血管事件,是发达国家死亡的主要原因之一,(2)在过去十年中,这些国家的UPF消费量呈指数级增长。在美国,肥胖率超过40% (Phelps et al., 2024),每10人中就有1人患有T2D (Fang et al., 2023), UPFs的消耗平均占总能量摄入的50%以上(Touvier et al., 2023)。然而,由于几个原因,UPF与健康状况不佳之间的联系尚未得到很好的理解。首先,UPF的概念没有得到很好的定义,著名的新星分类因不一致和基于有缺陷的标准而受到公开批评(ahrn等人,2024;Petrus et al., 2021)。一些作者同意,某些PF/UPF,如强化食品或动物性食品的植物性类似物,可能不被认为是潜在有害的,而另一些作者则指出,这些相同的加工食品对健康有潜在的负面影响。与这一争议一致,基于流行病学/观察性研究的相关性并不意味着因果关系,因此,可能导致这种不良健康状况的UPF/食物成分目前尚不清楚。此外,工业食品加工在便利、食品安全和适口性方面取得了无可争议的进步,这可能被视为积极的贡献。考虑到所有这些争议和挑战,本期特刊(SI)旨在为食品科学家提供一个平台,通过简明的评论提供他们对这一热门话题的批判性意见,并发表一些创新研究的原创结果。这本SI可以作为一套鼓舞人心的作品,鼓励食品科学家设计和开展更具挑战性的研究,旨在了解加工对食品结构和成分的影响,进而对营养和健康结果的影响。有了新发现的、透明的、基于科学的数据,食品工业将能够设计和生产美味、饱腹、营养和健康的PF和UPF。Mario esteminvez, DVM,博士JFS特刊:超加工食品客座编辑,食品科学杂志科学编辑,西班牙埃斯特雷马杜拉大学教授
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Special issue on ultra-processed foods

Special issue on ultra-processed foods

Special issue on ultra-processed foods

Special issue on ultra-processed foods

Special issue on ultra-processed foods

The role played by foods and dietary patterns in human well-being goes beyond the mere nutritional contribution since they influence our physical and mental health, evoke hedonic sensations, and even influence our mood. Health authorities and consumers (and society as a whole) are increasingly concerned about the relationship between the consumption of processed foods (PF) and ultra-processed foods (UPF) on the onset of chronic diseases such as diabesity (type 2 diabetes [T2D] in obese individuals) or some types of cancer. There are well-founded reasons for this concern since (1) diabesity, frequently accompanied by cardiovascular events, is one of the main causes of death in developed countries, and (2) the consumption of UPF has increased exponentially in those countries in the last decade. In the United States, where the prevalence of obesity is above 40% (Phelps et al., 2024) and 1 out of 10 people suffer from T2D (Fang et al., 2023), the consumption of UPFs consists, on average, of more than 50% of the total energy intake (Touvier et al., 2023). The connection between UPF and poor health, however, is not well understood for several reasons. First, the concept of UPF is not well defined, and the renown Nova classification is openly criticized for being inconsistent and based on flawed criteria (Ahrné et al., 2024; Petrus et al., 2021). Some authors would agree that certain PF/UPF, such as fortified foods or plant-based analogues of animal foods, may not be ascribed as potentially harmful, while others state the potential negative influence on health of these same fabricated foods. In line with this controversy, the correlations based on epidemiological/observational studies do not imply causality, and hence, the precise UPF/food components likely responsible for such poor health are currently unknown. Furthermore, industrial food processing has enabled indisputable advances toward convenience, food safety, and palatability that may be regarded as positive contributions. Bearing all these controversies and challenges in mind, this special issue (SI) was conceived as a platform for food scientists to provide their critical opinion on this hot topic via concise reviews and to publish some original results from innovative studies. This SI may serve as an inspirational set of works from which food scientists may be encouraged to design and carry out more challenging studies aimed to understand the impact of processing on food structure and composition and that, in turn, on nutrition and health outcomes. With newfound, transparent, and scientifically based data, the food industry shall be able to design and produce palatable, and yet, satiating, nutritious, and healthy PF and UPF.

Sincerely,

Mario Estévez, DVM, PhD

Guest Editor, JFS Special Issue: Ultra-Processed Foods

Scientific Editor, Journal of Food Science

Professor, Universidad de Extremadura, Spain

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Food Science
Journal of Food Science 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
412
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: The goal of the Journal of Food Science is to offer scientists, researchers, and other food professionals the opportunity to share knowledge of scientific advancements in the myriad disciplines affecting their work, through a respected peer-reviewed publication. The Journal of Food Science serves as an international forum for vital research and developments in food science. The range of topics covered in the journal include: -Concise Reviews and Hypotheses in Food Science -New Horizons in Food Research -Integrated Food Science -Food Chemistry -Food Engineering, Materials Science, and Nanotechnology -Food Microbiology and Safety -Sensory and Consumer Sciences -Health, Nutrition, and Food -Toxicology and Chemical Food Safety The Journal of Food Science publishes peer-reviewed articles that cover all aspects of food science, including safety and nutrition. Reviews should be 15 to 50 typewritten pages (including tables, figures, and references), should provide in-depth coverage of a narrowly defined topic, and should embody careful evaluation (weaknesses, strengths, explanation of discrepancies in results among similar studies) of all pertinent studies, so that insightful interpretations and conclusions can be presented. Hypothesis papers are especially appropriate in pioneering areas of research or important areas that are afflicted by scientific controversy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信