印度干旱区废水灌溉条件下土壤质量和生物量评价

IF 1.5 Q4 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Genda Singh, Prem Raj Nagora, Parul Haksar, Shubhi Kulshrestha, Abha Rani
{"title":"印度干旱区废水灌溉条件下土壤质量和生物量评价","authors":"Genda Singh,&nbsp;Prem Raj Nagora,&nbsp;Parul Haksar,&nbsp;Shubhi Kulshrestha,&nbsp;Abha Rani","doi":"10.1002/tqem.70051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Indiscriminate discharge of effluents in rivers, waterbodies, and croplands is a common practice contaminating food chains through water and soil. Plantations using treated wastewater can help restore degraded lands and reduce soil and environmental pollution. One-year-old plantations of <i>Azadirachta indica, Eucalyptus camaldulensis, Prosopis cineraria, Prosopis juliflora, Tamarix aphylla, Salvadora persica</i>, and <i>Salvadora oleoides</i> were irrigated with borewell water at ½ET (Evapotranspiration, I<sub>1</sub>) and treated wastewater at ½ET (I<sub>2</sub>), ¾ET (I<sub>3</sub>), and 1ET (I<sub>4</sub>) for 4 years (September 2013–September 2017), to assess the remedial impact of these species on soils while reusing wastewater in urban greening and biomass production. Wastewater irrigation enhanced soil pH/EC (&lt;1.0 unit) and SOC and nutrient contents (1.23–13.25-fold). Such increases were highest (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) in 0–15 cm and lowest in 45–60 cm (50%–70%) soil layers. Species types and irrigation levels influenced soil salts and nutrient concentrations. Variations in pH/EC (&lt;0.50 unit), SOC/nutrient contents (1.59–2.11-fold), and total biomass (3.26-fold) were greater between species than between irrigation levels (&lt;0.30 unit, 1.14–3.33-fold and 1.81-fold variations, respectively). Salt and nutrient uptake were highest in <i>S. oleoides</i> and <i>P. cineraria</i>, medium in <i>T. aphylla</i> and <i>E. camaldulensis</i>, and lowest in <i>S. persica</i>, <i>A. indica</i>, and <i>P. juliflora</i> plots. Leaf mineral contents were below toxic levels. The former three species and <i>S. persica</i> responded by increasing biomass allocation to roots. In contrast, other species maximized root biomass to augment added water and nutrient uptake to sustain growing biomass. Conclusively, tree species influenced soil properties and biomass more notably than irrigation level, where adaptation mechanisms were allocated to/or maximized root biomass. Increased SOC and nutrients, and consequently plant biomass highlight the reuse of treated wastewater in plantations that remediated soil and promoted greenery and biomass in water-deficient dry areas.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":35327,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Quality Management","volume":"34 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Soil Quality and Biomass Productivity Under Wastewater Irrigation in the Indian Arid Region\",\"authors\":\"Genda Singh,&nbsp;Prem Raj Nagora,&nbsp;Parul Haksar,&nbsp;Shubhi Kulshrestha,&nbsp;Abha Rani\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/tqem.70051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Indiscriminate discharge of effluents in rivers, waterbodies, and croplands is a common practice contaminating food chains through water and soil. Plantations using treated wastewater can help restore degraded lands and reduce soil and environmental pollution. One-year-old plantations of <i>Azadirachta indica, Eucalyptus camaldulensis, Prosopis cineraria, Prosopis juliflora, Tamarix aphylla, Salvadora persica</i>, and <i>Salvadora oleoides</i> were irrigated with borewell water at ½ET (Evapotranspiration, I<sub>1</sub>) and treated wastewater at ½ET (I<sub>2</sub>), ¾ET (I<sub>3</sub>), and 1ET (I<sub>4</sub>) for 4 years (September 2013–September 2017), to assess the remedial impact of these species on soils while reusing wastewater in urban greening and biomass production. Wastewater irrigation enhanced soil pH/EC (&lt;1.0 unit) and SOC and nutrient contents (1.23–13.25-fold). Such increases were highest (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) in 0–15 cm and lowest in 45–60 cm (50%–70%) soil layers. Species types and irrigation levels influenced soil salts and nutrient concentrations. Variations in pH/EC (&lt;0.50 unit), SOC/nutrient contents (1.59–2.11-fold), and total biomass (3.26-fold) were greater between species than between irrigation levels (&lt;0.30 unit, 1.14–3.33-fold and 1.81-fold variations, respectively). Salt and nutrient uptake were highest in <i>S. oleoides</i> and <i>P. cineraria</i>, medium in <i>T. aphylla</i> and <i>E. camaldulensis</i>, and lowest in <i>S. persica</i>, <i>A. indica</i>, and <i>P. juliflora</i> plots. Leaf mineral contents were below toxic levels. The former three species and <i>S. persica</i> responded by increasing biomass allocation to roots. In contrast, other species maximized root biomass to augment added water and nutrient uptake to sustain growing biomass. Conclusively, tree species influenced soil properties and biomass more notably than irrigation level, where adaptation mechanisms were allocated to/or maximized root biomass. Increased SOC and nutrients, and consequently plant biomass highlight the reuse of treated wastewater in plantations that remediated soil and promoted greenery and biomass in water-deficient dry areas.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35327,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Quality Management\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Quality Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tqem.70051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Quality Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tqem.70051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

向河流、水体和农田随意排放污水是通过水和土壤污染食物链的常见做法。使用处理过的废水的种植园可以帮助恢复退化的土地,减少土壤和环境污染。2013年9月- 2017年9月,采用1 / 2 ET(蒸散量,I1)和1 / 2 ET (I2)、3 / 4 ET (I3)、1 / 4 ET (I4)处理的井水灌溉1年生的印楝、桉树、灰桉、紫豆、柽柳、桃木耳和榄木耳人工林,评估了这些树种在城市绿化和生物质生产中再利用废水的同时对土壤的修复作用。废水灌溉提高了土壤pH/EC (<;1.0单位)和有机碳和养分含量(1.23 - 13.25倍)。这样的增长是最高的(p <;0.05), 45 ~ 60 cm土层(50% ~ 70%)最低。物种类型和灌溉水平影响土壤盐分和养分浓度。pH/EC(0.50单位)、有机碳/养分含量(1.59 ~ 2.11倍)和总生物量(3.26倍)在不同灌水水平间的差异均大于不同灌水水平间的差异(分别为0.30、1.14 ~ 3.33和1.81倍)。含盐量和养分吸收量最高的是油橄榄和灰葡萄,中等的是葡萄和山梨花,最低的是蜜桃、籼稻和黄花。叶片矿物质含量低于毒性水平。前三种植物和桃香通过增加根系生物量分配来应对。相反,其他物种最大化根系生物量,以增加水分和养分的吸收,以维持生物量的增长。最后,树种对土壤性质和生物量的影响比灌溉水平更显著,灌溉水平的适应机制分配给/或最大化根系生物量。土壤有机碳和养分的增加,以及植物生物量的增加,突出了在干旱缺水地区修复土壤、促进绿化和生物量的人工林中处理过的废水的再利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing Soil Quality and Biomass Productivity Under Wastewater Irrigation in the Indian Arid Region

Indiscriminate discharge of effluents in rivers, waterbodies, and croplands is a common practice contaminating food chains through water and soil. Plantations using treated wastewater can help restore degraded lands and reduce soil and environmental pollution. One-year-old plantations of Azadirachta indica, Eucalyptus camaldulensis, Prosopis cineraria, Prosopis juliflora, Tamarix aphylla, Salvadora persica, and Salvadora oleoides were irrigated with borewell water at ½ET (Evapotranspiration, I1) and treated wastewater at ½ET (I2), ¾ET (I3), and 1ET (I4) for 4 years (September 2013–September 2017), to assess the remedial impact of these species on soils while reusing wastewater in urban greening and biomass production. Wastewater irrigation enhanced soil pH/EC (<1.0 unit) and SOC and nutrient contents (1.23–13.25-fold). Such increases were highest (p < 0.05) in 0–15 cm and lowest in 45–60 cm (50%–70%) soil layers. Species types and irrigation levels influenced soil salts and nutrient concentrations. Variations in pH/EC (<0.50 unit), SOC/nutrient contents (1.59–2.11-fold), and total biomass (3.26-fold) were greater between species than between irrigation levels (<0.30 unit, 1.14–3.33-fold and 1.81-fold variations, respectively). Salt and nutrient uptake were highest in S. oleoides and P. cineraria, medium in T. aphylla and E. camaldulensis, and lowest in S. persica, A. indica, and P. juliflora plots. Leaf mineral contents were below toxic levels. The former three species and S. persica responded by increasing biomass allocation to roots. In contrast, other species maximized root biomass to augment added water and nutrient uptake to sustain growing biomass. Conclusively, tree species influenced soil properties and biomass more notably than irrigation level, where adaptation mechanisms were allocated to/or maximized root biomass. Increased SOC and nutrients, and consequently plant biomass highlight the reuse of treated wastewater in plantations that remediated soil and promoted greenery and biomass in water-deficient dry areas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Quality Management
Environmental Quality Management Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Four times a year, this practical journal shows you how to improve environmental performance and exceed voluntary standards such as ISO 14000. In each issue, you"ll find in-depth articles and the most current case studies of successful environmental quality improvement efforts -- and guidance on how you can apply these goals to your organization. Written by leading industry experts and practitioners, Environmental Quality Management brings you innovative practices in Performance Measurement...Life-Cycle Assessments...Safety Management... Environmental Auditing...ISO 14000 Standards and Certification..."Green Accounting"...Environmental Communication...Sustainable Development Issues...Environmental Benchmarking...Global Environmental Law and Regulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信