瑞典各市风能部署和升级的空间异质性

Yodefia Rahmad , Fredrik Hedenus , Jessica Jewell , Vadim Vinichenko
{"title":"瑞典各市风能部署和升级的空间异质性","authors":"Yodefia Rahmad ,&nbsp;Fredrik Hedenus ,&nbsp;Jessica Jewell ,&nbsp;Vadim Vinichenko","doi":"10.1016/j.rset.2025.100104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Deployment of new onshore wind power faces challenges due to growing resistance, prompting increased interest in the development of effective deployment strategies. One approach is to examine historical deployment to identify factors shaping its distribution within a country. Current literature presents inconsistent results and lacks theoretically grounded approaches. This study enhanced the methodology for analyzing subnational wind deployment in two ways. First, techno-economic, socio-technical, and political perspectives from national energy transition literature were employed to identify relevant deployment mechanisms. Second, the approach differentiated between small-scale and large-scale wind power to avoid conflating results from obsolete technologies. The method is piloted in Sweden where wind deployment varied significantly despite nationwide policies. Findings from Sweden suggest that subnational heterogeneity of wind deployment at the municipality level is not primarily determined by techno-economic factors, but also by socio-technical and political variables. Deployment mechanisms also evolved over time, possibly due to technological upscaling. Small-scale wind power (≤1.5 MW) leveraged agricultural land and accumulated local experience, while large-scale wind power (&gt;1.5 MW) is correlated with political variables such as siting policy and voter turnout. Municipalities with the highest large-scale deployment typically have extensive forest cover, low population density and wind speeds within a lower median range relative to the national median. Findings from Sweden can inform hypotheses for evaluation in other countries and future research can extend the proposed analytical framework to different national contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101071,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spatial heterogeneity in deployment and upscaling of wind power in Swedish municipalities\",\"authors\":\"Yodefia Rahmad ,&nbsp;Fredrik Hedenus ,&nbsp;Jessica Jewell ,&nbsp;Vadim Vinichenko\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rset.2025.100104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Deployment of new onshore wind power faces challenges due to growing resistance, prompting increased interest in the development of effective deployment strategies. One approach is to examine historical deployment to identify factors shaping its distribution within a country. Current literature presents inconsistent results and lacks theoretically grounded approaches. This study enhanced the methodology for analyzing subnational wind deployment in two ways. First, techno-economic, socio-technical, and political perspectives from national energy transition literature were employed to identify relevant deployment mechanisms. Second, the approach differentiated between small-scale and large-scale wind power to avoid conflating results from obsolete technologies. The method is piloted in Sweden where wind deployment varied significantly despite nationwide policies. Findings from Sweden suggest that subnational heterogeneity of wind deployment at the municipality level is not primarily determined by techno-economic factors, but also by socio-technical and political variables. Deployment mechanisms also evolved over time, possibly due to technological upscaling. Small-scale wind power (≤1.5 MW) leveraged agricultural land and accumulated local experience, while large-scale wind power (&gt;1.5 MW) is correlated with political variables such as siting policy and voter turnout. Municipalities with the highest large-scale deployment typically have extensive forest cover, low population density and wind speeds within a lower median range relative to the national median. Findings from Sweden can inform hypotheses for evaluation in other countries and future research can extend the proposed analytical framework to different national contexts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667095X25000029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667095X25000029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于阻力越来越大,新的陆上风力发电的部署面临挑战,促使人们对开发有效部署策略的兴趣日益增加。一种方法是检查历史部署,以确定影响其在一个国家内分布的因素。目前的文献提出了不一致的结果,缺乏理论基础的方法。这项研究从两个方面加强了分析地方风力部署的方法。首先,利用各国能源转型文献中的技术经济、社会技术和政治视角来确定相关的部署机制。其次,该方法区分了小规模和大规模风力发电,以避免将过时技术的结果混为一谈。该方法在瑞典进行了试点,尽管有全国性的政策,但瑞典的风能部署差异很大。瑞典的研究结果表明,地方各级风能部署的异质性主要不是由技术经济因素决定的,而是由社会技术和政治变量决定的。部署机制也随着时间的推移而发展,可能是由于技术的升级。小规模风力发电(≤1.5 MW)利用了农业用地,积累了当地经验,而大规模风力发电(≤1.5 MW)则与选址政策、选民投票率等政治变量相关。拥有最高规模部署的城市通常具有广泛的森林覆盖,低人口密度和相对于全国中位数较低的风速中位数范围。瑞典的研究结果可以为其他国家的评估假设提供依据,未来的研究可以将提出的分析框架扩展到不同的国家背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Spatial heterogeneity in deployment and upscaling of wind power in Swedish municipalities
Deployment of new onshore wind power faces challenges due to growing resistance, prompting increased interest in the development of effective deployment strategies. One approach is to examine historical deployment to identify factors shaping its distribution within a country. Current literature presents inconsistent results and lacks theoretically grounded approaches. This study enhanced the methodology for analyzing subnational wind deployment in two ways. First, techno-economic, socio-technical, and political perspectives from national energy transition literature were employed to identify relevant deployment mechanisms. Second, the approach differentiated between small-scale and large-scale wind power to avoid conflating results from obsolete technologies. The method is piloted in Sweden where wind deployment varied significantly despite nationwide policies. Findings from Sweden suggest that subnational heterogeneity of wind deployment at the municipality level is not primarily determined by techno-economic factors, but also by socio-technical and political variables. Deployment mechanisms also evolved over time, possibly due to technological upscaling. Small-scale wind power (≤1.5 MW) leveraged agricultural land and accumulated local experience, while large-scale wind power (>1.5 MW) is correlated with political variables such as siting policy and voter turnout. Municipalities with the highest large-scale deployment typically have extensive forest cover, low population density and wind speeds within a lower median range relative to the national median. Findings from Sweden can inform hypotheses for evaluation in other countries and future research can extend the proposed analytical framework to different national contexts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信