口吃研究的一年：2020年英语期刊全球代表性和社会人口报告实践的系统回顾

IF 1.8 3区医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY

Journal of Communication Disorders Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2025.106500

Ryan A. Millager , Talia Liu , Dillon G. Pruett , Robin M. Jones

{"title":"口吃研究的一年：2020年英语期刊全球代表性和社会人口报告实践的系统回顾","authors":"Ryan A. Millager , Talia Liu , Dillon G. Pruett , Robin M. Jones","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2025.106500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Demographic data is inconsistently reported and defined in communication sciences and disorders research, yet gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status (SES) may be critical considerations for investigations of stuttering. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the global scope and sociodemographic reporting practices among stuttering research published in the year 2020.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Article searches were conducted in February 2023 in PsycINFO, PubMed, and ASHAWire for studies sampling participants with developmental stuttering or cluttering. Further inclusion criteria for systematic review were that articles must: (a) be published in the year 2020, (b) be published in a peer-reviewed journal, and (c) present original empirical research. Participant gender, ethnicity, and SES were extracted via a manualized coding scheme.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The total corpus for review included <em>k</em> = 92 articles, representing a total <em>n</em> = 7,342 participants recruited from 26 different countries. The majority of articles (<em>k</em> = 36) were based in the United States (US), with all other countries contributing between 1 and 5 articles each. Gender (or sex) was reported in 93.5% of included studies, ethnicity in 22.8%, and SES in 41.3%. Reporting practices did not significantly differ between US and non-US countries. Of note, only one article in 2020 recruited participants who clutter, with all others recruiting participants who stutter.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This is the first systematic review of diversity and reporting practices in the global stuttering research literature. Our results revealed a narrow global distribution of research participants, with limited reporting and analyses regarding participant ethnicity or SES. Consequently, we have identified opportunities to improve research participant transparency and to further consider sociocultural variables toward the advancement of global and inclusive stuttering research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 106500"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A year in stuttering research: A systematic review of global representation and sociodemographic reporting practices in English-language journals in 2020\",\"authors\":\"Ryan A. Millager , Talia Liu , Dillon G. Pruett , Robin M. Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2025.106500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Demographic data is inconsistently reported and defined in communication sciences and disorders research, yet gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status (SES) may be critical considerations for investigations of stuttering. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the global scope and sociodemographic reporting practices among stuttering research published in the year 2020.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Article searches were conducted in February 2023 in PsycINFO, PubMed, and ASHAWire for studies sampling participants with developmental stuttering or cluttering. Further inclusion criteria for systematic review were that articles must: (a) be published in the year 2020, (b) be published in a peer-reviewed journal, and (c) present original empirical research. Participant gender, ethnicity, and SES were extracted via a manualized coding scheme.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The total corpus for review included <em>k</em> = 92 articles, representing a total <em>n</em> = 7,342 participants recruited from 26 different countries. The majority of articles (<em>k</em> = 36) were based in the United States (US), with all other countries contributing between 1 and 5 articles each. Gender (or sex) was reported in 93.5% of included studies, ethnicity in 22.8%, and SES in 41.3%. Reporting practices did not significantly differ between US and non-US countries. Of note, only one article in 2020 recruited participants who clutter, with all others recruiting participants who stutter.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This is the first systematic review of diversity and reporting practices in the global stuttering research literature. Our results revealed a narrow global distribution of research participants, with limited reporting and analyses regarding participant ethnicity or SES. Consequently, we have identified opportunities to improve research participant transparency and to further consider sociocultural variables toward the advancement of global and inclusive stuttering research.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Communication Disorders\",\"volume\":\"114 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106500\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Communication Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021992425000073\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021992425000073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在传播科学和障碍研究中，人口学数据的报告和定义不一致，但性别、种族和社会经济地位（SES）可能是口吃调查的关键考虑因素。因此，本研究的目的是评估2020年发表的口吃研究的全球范围和社会人口学报告实践。方法于2023年2月在PsycINFO、PubMed和ASHAWire上检索有发展性口吃或杂乱的研究样本。系统评价的进一步纳入标准是文章必须：(a)在2020年发表，(b)发表在同行评议的期刊上，(c)是原创的实证研究。通过手动编码方案提取参与者的性别、种族和社会经济地位。结果共纳入k = 92篇文献，共计n = 7342名受试者，来自26个不同国家。大多数文章（k = 36）来自美国（US），所有其他国家分别贡献了1到5篇文章。93.5%的纳入研究报告了性别，22.8%的研究报告了种族，41.3%的研究报告了社会经济地位。报告实践在美国和非美国国家之间没有显著差异。值得注意的是，2020年只有一篇文章招募了杂乱无章的参与者，其他所有文章都招募了口吃的参与者。结论：本研究首次系统回顾了全球口吃研究文献的多样性和报告实践。我们的研究结果显示，研究参与者的全球分布范围很窄，关于参与者种族或社会经济地位的报告和分析也很有限。因此，我们已经确定了提高研究参与者透明度的机会，并进一步考虑社会文化变量，以推进全球和包容性口吃研究。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

A year in stuttering research: A systematic review of global representation and sociodemographic reporting practices in English-language journals in 2020

查看原文本刊更多论文

A year in stuttering research: A systematic review of global representation and sociodemographic reporting practices in English-language journals in 2020

Purpose

Demographic data is inconsistently reported and defined in communication sciences and disorders research, yet gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status (SES) may be critical considerations for investigations of stuttering. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the global scope and sociodemographic reporting practices among stuttering research published in the year 2020.

Methods

Article searches were conducted in February 2023 in PsycINFO, PubMed, and ASHAWire for studies sampling participants with developmental stuttering or cluttering. Further inclusion criteria for systematic review were that articles must: (a) be published in the year 2020, (b) be published in a peer-reviewed journal, and (c) present original empirical research. Participant gender, ethnicity, and SES were extracted via a manualized coding scheme.

Results

The total corpus for review included k = 92 articles, representing a total n = 7,342 participants recruited from 26 different countries. The majority of articles (k = 36) were based in the United States (US), with all other countries contributing between 1 and 5 articles each. Gender (or sex) was reported in 93.5% of included studies, ethnicity in 22.8%, and SES in 41.3%. Reporting practices did not significantly differ between US and non-US countries. Of note, only one article in 2020 recruited participants who clutter, with all others recruiting participants who stutter.

Conclusion

This is the first systematic review of diversity and reporting practices in the global stuttering research literature. Our results revealed a narrow global distribution of research participants, with limited reporting and analyses regarding participant ethnicity or SES. Consequently, we have identified opportunities to improve research participant transparency and to further consider sociocultural variables toward the advancement of global and inclusive stuttering research.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Communication Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION

CiteScore

3.30

自引率

5.90%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of Communication Disorders publishes original articles on topics related to disorders of speech, language and hearing. Authors are encouraged to submit reports of experimental or descriptive investigations (research articles), review articles, tutorials or discussion papers, or letters to the editor ("short communications"). Please note that we do not accept case studies unless they conform to the principles of single-subject experimental design. Special issues are published periodically on timely and clinically relevant topics.