从个人主义的角度评价大卫·列维的性爱机器人乌托邦

Kai-man KWAN
{"title":"从个人主义的角度评价大卫·列维的性爱机器人乌托邦","authors":"Kai-man KWAN","doi":"10.1016/j.techum.2024.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The coming of sex robots has generated a lot of discussions. The scholarly debate on love &amp; sex with sexbots has been ignited mostly by David Levy's book in 2007, <em>Love + Sex with Robots: The Evolution of Human-Robot Relationships</em>. Levy is an enthusiastic advocate for sex with sexbot, but his positive assessment of sexbots is contradicted by severe criticisms of the use of sexbots, most of which come from the radical feminists like Kathleen Richardson but other critics provide a personalist critique of Levy. In this essay, I will explore this personalist critique in some details. I will also engage with Levy's detailed arguments, &amp; put these discussions within the context of contemporary philosophy of sex.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100956,"journal":{"name":"New Techno-Humanities","volume":"4 1","pages":"Pages 21-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing David levy's sex robot utopianism from the personalist perspective\",\"authors\":\"Kai-man KWAN\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.techum.2024.10.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The coming of sex robots has generated a lot of discussions. The scholarly debate on love &amp; sex with sexbots has been ignited mostly by David Levy's book in 2007, <em>Love + Sex with Robots: The Evolution of Human-Robot Relationships</em>. Levy is an enthusiastic advocate for sex with sexbot, but his positive assessment of sexbots is contradicted by severe criticisms of the use of sexbots, most of which come from the radical feminists like Kathleen Richardson but other critics provide a personalist critique of Levy. In this essay, I will explore this personalist critique in some details. I will also engage with Levy's detailed arguments, &amp; put these discussions within the context of contemporary philosophy of sex.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Techno-Humanities\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 21-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Techno-Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2664329424000177\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Techno-Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2664329424000177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

性爱机器人的到来引发了很多讨论。关于爱情的学术争论2007年,大卫·列维的书《与机器人的爱与性:人类与机器人关系的进化》点燃了人们与机器人的性爱。列维是性爱机器人的热情倡导者,但他对性爱机器人的积极评价与对性爱机器人使用的严厉批评相矛盾,这些批评大多来自凯瑟琳·理查森(Kathleen Richardson)等激进女权主义者,但其他批评者对列维进行了个人主义的批评。在这篇文章中,我将详细探讨这种个人主义批判。我还将讨论列维的详细论点。把这些讨论放在当代性哲学的背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing David levy's sex robot utopianism from the personalist perspective
The coming of sex robots has generated a lot of discussions. The scholarly debate on love & sex with sexbots has been ignited mostly by David Levy's book in 2007, Love + Sex with Robots: The Evolution of Human-Robot Relationships. Levy is an enthusiastic advocate for sex with sexbot, but his positive assessment of sexbots is contradicted by severe criticisms of the use of sexbots, most of which come from the radical feminists like Kathleen Richardson but other critics provide a personalist critique of Levy. In this essay, I will explore this personalist critique in some details. I will also engage with Levy's detailed arguments, & put these discussions within the context of contemporary philosophy of sex.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信