{"title":"文化多元化和包容性城市复兴:墨尔本丹德农的经验","authors":"Hayley Henderson, Helen Sullivan, Brendan Gleeson","doi":"10.1016/j.progress.2025.100943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines urban revitalisation in Dandenong, a key activity centre in Melbourne and one of Australia’s most culturally diverse localities. Conducted in two phases, the research focused on state-led revitalisation between 2006–2021. The first phase of the research (2015–2019) formed part of an international study on collaborative urban governance post-Global Financial Crisis, using predominantly qualitative methods (Davies et al., 2022). The second phase employed statistical and geospatial analyses (2011–2021) to examine the extent of superdiversity and potential gentrification risks in Dandenong, as two lesser-understood phenomena emerging from the first phase of the study. This paper first seeks to identify the social and spatial conditions that supported superdiversity to consolidate as a key feature of Dandenong over time. Framed by Fincher and Iveson’s (2008) <em>social logics</em>—redistribution, recognition, and encounter—the paper then critically explains how inclusive revitalisation emerged in this superdiverse activity centre. We found that a well-resourced revitalisation program led by the Victorian Government and decisive, revitalisation works led by the local council, the City of Greater Dandenong built upon existing community-based mutual support networks and place-making activities to instigate a process of revitalisation. We then offer reflections on the qualities of public policy and collaboration, including values like openness to difference and acknowledgment of interconnectedness, which supported distinct opportunities for learning and solidarity in problem-solving the complex issue of urban decline in Dandenong. However, the paper also reveals limitations, where recognition of difference fell short, exposing some exclusionary elements within the revitalisation process. The findings underscore the importance of planning with social justice principles, local capacity, and recognising the value of cultural diversity and pluralism for urban renewal efforts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47399,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Planning","volume":"194 ","pages":"Article 100943"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cultural pluralism and inclusive urban revitalisation: The experience of Dandenong, Melbourne\",\"authors\":\"Hayley Henderson, Helen Sullivan, Brendan Gleeson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.progress.2025.100943\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper examines urban revitalisation in Dandenong, a key activity centre in Melbourne and one of Australia’s most culturally diverse localities. Conducted in two phases, the research focused on state-led revitalisation between 2006–2021. The first phase of the research (2015–2019) formed part of an international study on collaborative urban governance post-Global Financial Crisis, using predominantly qualitative methods (Davies et al., 2022). The second phase employed statistical and geospatial analyses (2011–2021) to examine the extent of superdiversity and potential gentrification risks in Dandenong, as two lesser-understood phenomena emerging from the first phase of the study. This paper first seeks to identify the social and spatial conditions that supported superdiversity to consolidate as a key feature of Dandenong over time. Framed by Fincher and Iveson’s (2008) <em>social logics</em>—redistribution, recognition, and encounter—the paper then critically explains how inclusive revitalisation emerged in this superdiverse activity centre. We found that a well-resourced revitalisation program led by the Victorian Government and decisive, revitalisation works led by the local council, the City of Greater Dandenong built upon existing community-based mutual support networks and place-making activities to instigate a process of revitalisation. We then offer reflections on the qualities of public policy and collaboration, including values like openness to difference and acknowledgment of interconnectedness, which supported distinct opportunities for learning and solidarity in problem-solving the complex issue of urban decline in Dandenong. However, the paper also reveals limitations, where recognition of difference fell short, exposing some exclusionary elements within the revitalisation process. The findings underscore the importance of planning with social justice principles, local capacity, and recognising the value of cultural diversity and pluralism for urban renewal efforts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Planning\",\"volume\":\"194 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100943\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305900625000017\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Planning","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305900625000017","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文考察了丹德农的城市复兴,丹德农是墨尔本的一个重要活动中心,也是澳大利亚最具文化多样性的地方之一。该研究分两个阶段进行,重点关注2006年至2021年期间国家主导的振兴。研究的第一阶段(2015-2019)是全球金融危机后协同城市治理国际研究的一部分,主要使用定性方法(Davies et al., 2022)。第二阶段采用统计和地理空间分析(2011-2021)来检查丹德农的超多样性程度和潜在的中产阶级化风险,这是研究第一阶段出现的两个较少被理解的现象。本文首先试图确定支持超多样性随着时间的推移而巩固为丹德农的关键特征的社会和空间条件。在芬奇和艾维森(2008)的社会逻辑框架下——再分配、认可和遭遇——论文批判性地解释了包容性复兴是如何在这个超级多样化的活动中心出现的。我们发现,由维多利亚州政府领导的资源丰富的复兴计划和由当地议会领导的决定性的复兴工作,大丹德农市建立在现有的社区相互支持网络和场所制作活动的基础上,以激发振兴过程。然后,我们对公共政策和合作的品质进行了反思,包括对差异的开放和对相互联系的承认等价值观,这些价值观为解决丹德农城市衰落的复杂问题提供了独特的学习和团结机会。然而,该文件也揭示了局限性,其中对差异的认识不足,暴露了振兴过程中的一些排斥因素。研究结果强调了以社会公正原则、地方能力以及认识到文化多样性和多元化对城市重建工作的价值进行规划的重要性。
Cultural pluralism and inclusive urban revitalisation: The experience of Dandenong, Melbourne
This paper examines urban revitalisation in Dandenong, a key activity centre in Melbourne and one of Australia’s most culturally diverse localities. Conducted in two phases, the research focused on state-led revitalisation between 2006–2021. The first phase of the research (2015–2019) formed part of an international study on collaborative urban governance post-Global Financial Crisis, using predominantly qualitative methods (Davies et al., 2022). The second phase employed statistical and geospatial analyses (2011–2021) to examine the extent of superdiversity and potential gentrification risks in Dandenong, as two lesser-understood phenomena emerging from the first phase of the study. This paper first seeks to identify the social and spatial conditions that supported superdiversity to consolidate as a key feature of Dandenong over time. Framed by Fincher and Iveson’s (2008) social logics—redistribution, recognition, and encounter—the paper then critically explains how inclusive revitalisation emerged in this superdiverse activity centre. We found that a well-resourced revitalisation program led by the Victorian Government and decisive, revitalisation works led by the local council, the City of Greater Dandenong built upon existing community-based mutual support networks and place-making activities to instigate a process of revitalisation. We then offer reflections on the qualities of public policy and collaboration, including values like openness to difference and acknowledgment of interconnectedness, which supported distinct opportunities for learning and solidarity in problem-solving the complex issue of urban decline in Dandenong. However, the paper also reveals limitations, where recognition of difference fell short, exposing some exclusionary elements within the revitalisation process. The findings underscore the importance of planning with social justice principles, local capacity, and recognising the value of cultural diversity and pluralism for urban renewal efforts.
期刊介绍:
Progress in Planning is a multidisciplinary journal of research monographs offering a convenient and rapid outlet for extended papers in the field of spatial and environmental planning. Each issue comprises a single monograph of between 25,000 and 35,000 words. The journal is fully peer reviewed, has a global readership, and has been in publication since 1972.