虚拟击剑与传统击剑的经济基础

Dana L. Hoag , Ryan Reuter , Daniel F. Mooney , Jeff Vitale , John Ritten , Nathan DeLay , Paul H. Evangelista , Anthony Vorster
{"title":"虚拟击剑与传统击剑的经济基础","authors":"Dana L. Hoag ,&nbsp;Ryan Reuter ,&nbsp;Daniel F. Mooney ,&nbsp;Jeff Vitale ,&nbsp;John Ritten ,&nbsp;Nathan DeLay ,&nbsp;Paul H. Evangelista ,&nbsp;Anthony Vorster","doi":"10.1016/j.rala.2024.05.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>Virtual fencing (VF) for livestock is being commercialized by several companies in the United States.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Ranchers and land managers are interested in the potential benefits of VF but have reservations about its cost.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Cost structures of VF systems vary and are different from physical fencing, making direct comparisons difficult.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>We explore relevant costs and outline scenarios where VF systems are likely to be cost effective.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>We discuss practical considerations for livestock producers and rangeland managers who are considering adopting VF.</div></span></li></ul></div></div>","PeriodicalId":101057,"journal":{"name":"Rangelands","volume":"47 1","pages":"Pages 92-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The economic fundamentals of virtual fencing compared to traditional fencing\",\"authors\":\"Dana L. Hoag ,&nbsp;Ryan Reuter ,&nbsp;Daniel F. Mooney ,&nbsp;Jeff Vitale ,&nbsp;John Ritten ,&nbsp;Nathan DeLay ,&nbsp;Paul H. Evangelista ,&nbsp;Anthony Vorster\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rala.2024.05.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div><ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>Virtual fencing (VF) for livestock is being commercialized by several companies in the United States.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Ranchers and land managers are interested in the potential benefits of VF but have reservations about its cost.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Cost structures of VF systems vary and are different from physical fencing, making direct comparisons difficult.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>We explore relevant costs and outline scenarios where VF systems are likely to be cost effective.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>We discuss practical considerations for livestock producers and rangeland managers who are considering adopting VF.</div></span></li></ul></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rangelands\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 92-101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rangelands\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190052824000415\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rangelands","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190052824000415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

•美国几家公司正在将家畜虚拟围栏(VF)商业化。•牧场主和土地管理者对VF的潜在收益感兴趣,但对其成本持保留态度。VF系统的成本结构各不相同,与物理围栏不同,因此很难进行直接比较。•我们探讨了相关成本,并概述了VF系统可能具有成本效益的场景。•我们讨论了考虑采用VF的牲畜生产者和牧场管理者的实际考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The economic fundamentals of virtual fencing compared to traditional fencing
  • Virtual fencing (VF) for livestock is being commercialized by several companies in the United States.
  • Ranchers and land managers are interested in the potential benefits of VF but have reservations about its cost.
  • Cost structures of VF systems vary and are different from physical fencing, making direct comparisons difficult.
  • We explore relevant costs and outline scenarios where VF systems are likely to be cost effective.
  • We discuss practical considerations for livestock producers and rangeland managers who are considering adopting VF.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信