{"title":"[利用快速成像技术的化学移位编码MRI测量质子密度脂肪分数的准确性]。","authors":"Tomofumi Misaka, Satoshi Takenaka, Takayuki Ishida","doi":"10.6009/jjrt.25-1464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the accuracy of proton density fat fraction (PDFF) measurement using chemical shift-encoded MRI (CSE-MRI) with fast imaging techniques in a phantom.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 1.5T imaging system (Prodiva; Philips Healthcare) and PDFF phantom (Fat Fraction Phantom Model 300; Calimetrix) were used in this study. The acquisitions without fast imaging techniques (conventional acquisition), with parallel imaging in phase-encode direction (SENSE acquisition), with compressed sensing (CS-SENSE acquisition), and with parallel imaging in both phase-encode and slice-encode direction (Dual-SENSE acquisition) were performed. The following acceleration factors in SENSE and CS-SENSE acquisition were used: 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, and 8.0. For Dual-SENSE acquisition, the same acceleration factors (1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0) were set in each of the two directions. The relationships between reference PDFF values and PDFF measurements obtained using each acquisition were assessed using linear regression analysis and Bland-Altman analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to the linear regression analysis, the slopes and intercepts of regression lines were from 0.87 to 1.02 and from 0.06% to 3.55%, respectively. According to Bland-Altman analysis, there were fixed bias between reference PDFF values and PDFF measurements obtained using SENSE acquisition with reduction factor 8.0 and Dual-SENSE acquisition with reduction factor 5.0. For CS-SENSE acquisition with reduction factor from 7.0 to 8.0, SENSE acquisition with reduction factor from 3.0 to 8.0, and Dual-SENSE acquisition with reduction factor from 2.0 to 5.0, some vials had ±1.5% or more errors between the reference PDFF values and PDFF measurements in the range of 0% to 50% PDFF.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In CS-SENSE acquisition, the accuracy of PDFF measurement was maintained within 1.5% up to a reduction factor 6.0. The accuracy of PDFF measurement was maintained within 1.5% up to a reduction factor 2.0 in SENSE acquisition and a reduction factor 1.5 in Dual-SENSE acquisition.</p>","PeriodicalId":74309,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi","volume":"81 3","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Accuracy of Proton Density Fat Fraction Measurement Using Chemical Shift-encoded MRI with Fast Imaging Techniques].\",\"authors\":\"Tomofumi Misaka, Satoshi Takenaka, Takayuki Ishida\",\"doi\":\"10.6009/jjrt.25-1464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the accuracy of proton density fat fraction (PDFF) measurement using chemical shift-encoded MRI (CSE-MRI) with fast imaging techniques in a phantom.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 1.5T imaging system (Prodiva; Philips Healthcare) and PDFF phantom (Fat Fraction Phantom Model 300; Calimetrix) were used in this study. The acquisitions without fast imaging techniques (conventional acquisition), with parallel imaging in phase-encode direction (SENSE acquisition), with compressed sensing (CS-SENSE acquisition), and with parallel imaging in both phase-encode and slice-encode direction (Dual-SENSE acquisition) were performed. The following acceleration factors in SENSE and CS-SENSE acquisition were used: 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, and 8.0. For Dual-SENSE acquisition, the same acceleration factors (1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0) were set in each of the two directions. The relationships between reference PDFF values and PDFF measurements obtained using each acquisition were assessed using linear regression analysis and Bland-Altman analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to the linear regression analysis, the slopes and intercepts of regression lines were from 0.87 to 1.02 and from 0.06% to 3.55%, respectively. According to Bland-Altman analysis, there were fixed bias between reference PDFF values and PDFF measurements obtained using SENSE acquisition with reduction factor 8.0 and Dual-SENSE acquisition with reduction factor 5.0. For CS-SENSE acquisition with reduction factor from 7.0 to 8.0, SENSE acquisition with reduction factor from 3.0 to 8.0, and Dual-SENSE acquisition with reduction factor from 2.0 to 5.0, some vials had ±1.5% or more errors between the reference PDFF values and PDFF measurements in the range of 0% to 50% PDFF.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In CS-SENSE acquisition, the accuracy of PDFF measurement was maintained within 1.5% up to a reduction factor 6.0. The accuracy of PDFF measurement was maintained within 1.5% up to a reduction factor 2.0 in SENSE acquisition and a reduction factor 1.5 in Dual-SENSE acquisition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi\",\"volume\":\"81 3\",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.25-1464\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.25-1464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Accuracy of Proton Density Fat Fraction Measurement Using Chemical Shift-encoded MRI with Fast Imaging Techniques].
Purpose: To investigate the accuracy of proton density fat fraction (PDFF) measurement using chemical shift-encoded MRI (CSE-MRI) with fast imaging techniques in a phantom.
Methods: A 1.5T imaging system (Prodiva; Philips Healthcare) and PDFF phantom (Fat Fraction Phantom Model 300; Calimetrix) were used in this study. The acquisitions without fast imaging techniques (conventional acquisition), with parallel imaging in phase-encode direction (SENSE acquisition), with compressed sensing (CS-SENSE acquisition), and with parallel imaging in both phase-encode and slice-encode direction (Dual-SENSE acquisition) were performed. The following acceleration factors in SENSE and CS-SENSE acquisition were used: 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, and 8.0. For Dual-SENSE acquisition, the same acceleration factors (1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0) were set in each of the two directions. The relationships between reference PDFF values and PDFF measurements obtained using each acquisition were assessed using linear regression analysis and Bland-Altman analysis.
Results: According to the linear regression analysis, the slopes and intercepts of regression lines were from 0.87 to 1.02 and from 0.06% to 3.55%, respectively. According to Bland-Altman analysis, there were fixed bias between reference PDFF values and PDFF measurements obtained using SENSE acquisition with reduction factor 8.0 and Dual-SENSE acquisition with reduction factor 5.0. For CS-SENSE acquisition with reduction factor from 7.0 to 8.0, SENSE acquisition with reduction factor from 3.0 to 8.0, and Dual-SENSE acquisition with reduction factor from 2.0 to 5.0, some vials had ±1.5% or more errors between the reference PDFF values and PDFF measurements in the range of 0% to 50% PDFF.
Conclusion: In CS-SENSE acquisition, the accuracy of PDFF measurement was maintained within 1.5% up to a reduction factor 6.0. The accuracy of PDFF measurement was maintained within 1.5% up to a reduction factor 2.0 in SENSE acquisition and a reduction factor 1.5 in Dual-SENSE acquisition.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
