使用分类树改进群体认知行为治疗(CBT)的辍学预测。

IF 2.6 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Ashleigh G Cameron, Andrew C Page, Geoff R Hooke
{"title":"使用分类树改进群体认知行为治疗(CBT)的辍学预测。","authors":"Ashleigh G Cameron, Andrew C Page, Geoff R Hooke","doi":"10.1080/10503307.2025.2460327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Dropout is a major factor undermining the effectiveness of psychotherapy, however, it remains poorly anticipated in clinical practice. Classification trees may offer simple, accessible, and practical solutions to identifying patients at-risk of dropout by synthesizing potentially complex patterns of relationships among intake measures.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Intake variables were collected from day-patients who attended a Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) group program at a private psychiatric hospital between 2015 and 2019. Based on these variables, two classification trees were trained and tested to predict dropout in (1) a weekly group, and (2) an intensive daily program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dropout was lower in the intensive treatment (Weekly CBT = 21.9%, Daily CBT = 13.2%), however, in both programs, the number of comorbid diagnoses was the most important factor predicting dropout. Overall balanced accuracy was comparable for both tree models, with the Weekly CBT model identifying 63.18% of dropouts successfully, and the Daily CBT model identifying dropouts with 62.06% accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings suggest that comorbidity may be the most important factor to consider when assessing dropout risk in CBT, and that dropout can be predicted with moderate accuracy early in therapy via simple models. Furthermore, findings suggest that condensed, intensive treatments may bolster patient retention.</p>","PeriodicalId":48159,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved dropout prediction in group cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) using classification trees.\",\"authors\":\"Ashleigh G Cameron, Andrew C Page, Geoff R Hooke\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10503307.2025.2460327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Dropout is a major factor undermining the effectiveness of psychotherapy, however, it remains poorly anticipated in clinical practice. Classification trees may offer simple, accessible, and practical solutions to identifying patients at-risk of dropout by synthesizing potentially complex patterns of relationships among intake measures.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Intake variables were collected from day-patients who attended a Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) group program at a private psychiatric hospital between 2015 and 2019. Based on these variables, two classification trees were trained and tested to predict dropout in (1) a weekly group, and (2) an intensive daily program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dropout was lower in the intensive treatment (Weekly CBT = 21.9%, Daily CBT = 13.2%), however, in both programs, the number of comorbid diagnoses was the most important factor predicting dropout. Overall balanced accuracy was comparable for both tree models, with the Weekly CBT model identifying 63.18% of dropouts successfully, and the Daily CBT model identifying dropouts with 62.06% accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings suggest that comorbidity may be the most important factor to consider when assessing dropout risk in CBT, and that dropout can be predicted with moderate accuracy early in therapy via simple models. Furthermore, findings suggest that condensed, intensive treatments may bolster patient retention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychotherapy Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychotherapy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2025.2460327\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2025.2460327","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:辍学率是影响心理治疗效果的主要因素,但在临床实践中仍未得到充分的重视。通过综合摄入措施之间潜在的复杂关系模式,分类树可以为识别有辍学风险的患者提供简单、容易获取和实用的解决方案。方法:从2015年至2019年在一家私立精神病院参加认知行为治疗(CBT)小组项目的日间患者中收集摄入变量。基于这些变量,我们训练和测试了两种分类树,以预测(1)每周组和(2)密集的每日计划的辍学率。结果:强化治疗组的辍学率较低(每周CBT = 21.9%,每日CBT = 13.2%),但在两种方案中,共病诊断的数量是预测辍学率的最重要因素。两种树模型的总体平衡准确率相当,每周CBT模型成功识别辍学者63.18%,每日CBT模型识别辍学者的准确率为62.06%。结论:研究结果表明,在评估CBT的辍学风险时,合并症可能是最重要的考虑因素,并且通过简单的模型可以在治疗早期以中等准确度预测辍学。此外,研究结果表明,浓缩、强化的治疗可能会提高患者的保留率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improved dropout prediction in group cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) using classification trees.

Objective: Dropout is a major factor undermining the effectiveness of psychotherapy, however, it remains poorly anticipated in clinical practice. Classification trees may offer simple, accessible, and practical solutions to identifying patients at-risk of dropout by synthesizing potentially complex patterns of relationships among intake measures.

Method: Intake variables were collected from day-patients who attended a Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) group program at a private psychiatric hospital between 2015 and 2019. Based on these variables, two classification trees were trained and tested to predict dropout in (1) a weekly group, and (2) an intensive daily program.

Results: Dropout was lower in the intensive treatment (Weekly CBT = 21.9%, Daily CBT = 13.2%), however, in both programs, the number of comorbid diagnoses was the most important factor predicting dropout. Overall balanced accuracy was comparable for both tree models, with the Weekly CBT model identifying 63.18% of dropouts successfully, and the Daily CBT model identifying dropouts with 62.06% accuracy.

Conclusion: Findings suggest that comorbidity may be the most important factor to consider when assessing dropout risk in CBT, and that dropout can be predicted with moderate accuracy early in therapy via simple models. Furthermore, findings suggest that condensed, intensive treatments may bolster patient retention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychotherapy Research
Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
10.30%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy Research seeks to enhance the development, scientific quality, and social relevance of psychotherapy research and to foster the use of research findings in practice, education, and policy formulation. The Journal publishes reports of original research on all aspects of psychotherapy, including its outcomes, its processes, education of practitioners, and delivery of services. It also publishes methodological, theoretical, and review articles of direct relevance to psychotherapy research. The Journal is addressed to an international, interdisciplinary audience and welcomes submissions dealing with diverse theoretical orientations, treatment modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信