感知社会凝聚力是否能调节父母压力源对抑郁症状的影响?COVID-19大流行之前和期间的纵向、多层次分析。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Anita Alaze, Ellen Heidinger, Oliver Razum, Odile Sauzet
{"title":"感知社会凝聚力是否能调节父母压力源对抑郁症状的影响?COVID-19大流行之前和期间的纵向、多层次分析。","authors":"Anita Alaze, Ellen Heidinger, Oliver Razum, Odile Sauzet","doi":"10.1080/09638237.2025.2460121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perceived social cohesion (PSC) is a protective factor for mental health. Yet, evidence on social mechanisms influencing mental health is scarce.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We examined the moderating role of PSC between parental stressors and depressive symptoms before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a multilevel moderated linear regression analysis using German Socio-Economic Panel (G-SOEP) data to investigate the interaction of PSC in 2018 and in 2020 with parental stressors (having pre-school-aged child(-ren), concerns about COVID-19 infection, financial insecurity, working from home, changes at work) and depressive symptoms (PHQ-4) in 2020 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>3,112 observations from 1,621 participants were included in the regression analyses. The parental stressors had mostly negative, although not always significant effects on PHQ-4. Both PSC measures positively moderated the association between experienced financial insecurity and PHQ-4. PCS 2020 positively moderated the association between the stressors \"not working from home\" and \"being unemployed in 2020 or 2021\" compared to \"having no changes at work\" for those employed. It negatively moderated the association between \"having some concerns about infection\" and PHQ-4.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PSC can act as a buffer for parental mental health. Social cohesion should be promoted in public health interventions, especially during pandemics or disasters.</p>","PeriodicalId":48135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does perceived social cohesion moderate the effect of parental stressors on depressive symptoms? A longitudinal, multi-level analysis before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Anita Alaze, Ellen Heidinger, Oliver Razum, Odile Sauzet\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09638237.2025.2460121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perceived social cohesion (PSC) is a protective factor for mental health. Yet, evidence on social mechanisms influencing mental health is scarce.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We examined the moderating role of PSC between parental stressors and depressive symptoms before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a multilevel moderated linear regression analysis using German Socio-Economic Panel (G-SOEP) data to investigate the interaction of PSC in 2018 and in 2020 with parental stressors (having pre-school-aged child(-ren), concerns about COVID-19 infection, financial insecurity, working from home, changes at work) and depressive symptoms (PHQ-4) in 2020 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>3,112 observations from 1,621 participants were included in the regression analyses. The parental stressors had mostly negative, although not always significant effects on PHQ-4. Both PSC measures positively moderated the association between experienced financial insecurity and PHQ-4. PCS 2020 positively moderated the association between the stressors \\\"not working from home\\\" and \\\"being unemployed in 2020 or 2021\\\" compared to \\\"having no changes at work\\\" for those employed. It negatively moderated the association between \\\"having some concerns about infection\\\" and PHQ-4.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PSC can act as a buffer for parental mental health. Social cohesion should be promoted in public health interventions, especially during pandemics or disasters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mental Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2025.2460121\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2025.2460121","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:感知社会凝聚力(PSC)是心理健康的保护因素。然而,关于影响心理健康的社会机制的证据很少。目的:我们研究了在COVID-19大流行之前和期间,PSC在父母压力源和抑郁症状之间的调节作用。方法:利用德国社会经济调查小组(G-SOEP)数据进行多水平调节线性回归分析,调查2018年和2020年PSC与父母压力源(有学龄前儿童、对COVID-19感染的担忧、经济不安全感、在家工作、工作变化)和2020年和2021年抑郁症状(PHQ-4)的相互作用。结果:来自1621名参与者的3112项观察结果被纳入回归分析。父母应激源对PHQ-4的影响大多为负,但并不总是显著的。两种PSC测量都正向调节了经历过的财务不安全感与PHQ-4之间的关联。PCS 2020正向调节了压力源“不在家工作”和“在2020年或2021年失业”之间的关联,而对于那些有工作的人来说,压力源是“工作没有变化”。“担心感染”与PHQ-4之间的关系呈负向缓和。结论:PSC对父母心理健康具有缓冲作用。应在公共卫生干预措施中促进社会凝聚力,特别是在大流行病或灾害期间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does perceived social cohesion moderate the effect of parental stressors on depressive symptoms? A longitudinal, multi-level analysis before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: Perceived social cohesion (PSC) is a protective factor for mental health. Yet, evidence on social mechanisms influencing mental health is scarce.

Aims: We examined the moderating role of PSC between parental stressors and depressive symptoms before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: We performed a multilevel moderated linear regression analysis using German Socio-Economic Panel (G-SOEP) data to investigate the interaction of PSC in 2018 and in 2020 with parental stressors (having pre-school-aged child(-ren), concerns about COVID-19 infection, financial insecurity, working from home, changes at work) and depressive symptoms (PHQ-4) in 2020 and 2021.

Results: 3,112 observations from 1,621 participants were included in the regression analyses. The parental stressors had mostly negative, although not always significant effects on PHQ-4. Both PSC measures positively moderated the association between experienced financial insecurity and PHQ-4. PCS 2020 positively moderated the association between the stressors "not working from home" and "being unemployed in 2020 or 2021" compared to "having no changes at work" for those employed. It negatively moderated the association between "having some concerns about infection" and PHQ-4.

Conclusions: PSC can act as a buffer for parental mental health. Social cohesion should be promoted in public health interventions, especially during pandemics or disasters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mental Health
Journal of Mental Health PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
117
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health is an international forum for the latest research in the mental health field. Reaching over 65 countries, the journal reports on the best in evidence-based practice around the world and provides a channel of communication between the many disciplines involved in mental health research and practice. The journal encourages multi-disciplinary research and welcomes contributions that have involved the users of mental health services. The international editorial team are committed to seeking out excellent work from a range of sources and theoretical perspectives. The journal not only reflects current good practice but also aims to influence policy by reporting on innovations that challenge traditional ways of working.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信