了解创伤剖腹手术患者的住院时间:一项国家创伤数据库研究

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open Pub Date : 2025-02-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/tsaco-2024-001641
Hayaki Uchino, Evan G Wong, Kosar Khwaja, Jeremy Grushka
{"title":"了解创伤剖腹手术患者的住院时间:一项国家创伤数据库研究","authors":"Hayaki Uchino, Evan G Wong, Kosar Khwaja, Jeremy Grushka","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2024-001641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The diverse procedures and varying patient conditions in trauma laparotomy cases lead to significant variability in hospital length of stay (HLOS), posing challenges for effective patient care. Strategies to reduce HLOS are varied, with multiple factors potentially modifiable through targeted interventions. These interventions are most effective when target populations and their associated factors are clearly defined. This study aimed to stratify trauma laparotomy patients by their HLOS and identify factors associated with HLOS to enhance patient care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted using the National Trauma Data Bank from January 2017 to December 2019. Adult trauma patients who underwent trauma laparotomy following blunt or penetrating abdominal injuries were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes and Abbreviated Injury Scales. HLOS was stratified into three groups based on the IQR of the study population: short (< 5 days), medium (5-11 days) and long (> 11 days).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 27 434 trauma laparotomy patients were identified. The overall median HLOS was 7.0 (5.0, 11.0) days. Penetrating mechanisms, particularly stab wounds, were strongly associated with a short HLOS. Additionally, isolated abdominal trauma, splenic injuries or spleen-related procedure were more likely to result in a short HLOS. Patients with a long HLOS experienced higher rates of in-hospital complications and were more frequently discharged to home with home health services or to extended care facilities. Most comorbidities were associated with a long HLOS, and patients with Medicaid or Medicare had a higher likelihood of a long HLOS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the relatively homogenous trauma population, HLOS distribution varied significantly. Stratification based on HLOS revealed distinct factors associated with short and long HLOS categories, indicating that targeted interventions for each category could potentially reduce HLOS and enhance patient outcomes in the current era of constrained healthcare resources.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence study type: </strong>Level IV, therapeutic/care management.</p>","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"10 1","pages":"e001641"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11795517/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding hospital length of stay in trauma laparotomy patients: a National Trauma Database Study.\",\"authors\":\"Hayaki Uchino, Evan G Wong, Kosar Khwaja, Jeremy Grushka\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/tsaco-2024-001641\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The diverse procedures and varying patient conditions in trauma laparotomy cases lead to significant variability in hospital length of stay (HLOS), posing challenges for effective patient care. Strategies to reduce HLOS are varied, with multiple factors potentially modifiable through targeted interventions. These interventions are most effective when target populations and their associated factors are clearly defined. This study aimed to stratify trauma laparotomy patients by their HLOS and identify factors associated with HLOS to enhance patient care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted using the National Trauma Data Bank from January 2017 to December 2019. Adult trauma patients who underwent trauma laparotomy following blunt or penetrating abdominal injuries were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes and Abbreviated Injury Scales. HLOS was stratified into three groups based on the IQR of the study population: short (< 5 days), medium (5-11 days) and long (> 11 days).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 27 434 trauma laparotomy patients were identified. The overall median HLOS was 7.0 (5.0, 11.0) days. Penetrating mechanisms, particularly stab wounds, were strongly associated with a short HLOS. Additionally, isolated abdominal trauma, splenic injuries or spleen-related procedure were more likely to result in a short HLOS. Patients with a long HLOS experienced higher rates of in-hospital complications and were more frequently discharged to home with home health services or to extended care facilities. Most comorbidities were associated with a long HLOS, and patients with Medicaid or Medicare had a higher likelihood of a long HLOS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the relatively homogenous trauma population, HLOS distribution varied significantly. Stratification based on HLOS revealed distinct factors associated with short and long HLOS categories, indicating that targeted interventions for each category could potentially reduce HLOS and enhance patient outcomes in the current era of constrained healthcare resources.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence study type: </strong>Level IV, therapeutic/care management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"e001641\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11795517/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2024-001641\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2024-001641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:创伤剖腹手术的不同程序和不同的患者情况导致住院时间(HLOS)的显著差异,对有效的患者护理提出了挑战。减少HLOS的策略多种多样,通过有针对性的干预措施可以改变多个因素。当目标人群及其相关因素得到明确界定时,这些干预措施最为有效。本研究旨在对创伤剖腹手术患者的HLOS进行分层,并确定与HLOS相关的因素,以加强患者护理。方法:利用2017年1月至2019年12月的国家创伤数据库进行回顾性分析。采用国际疾病分类第10次修订代码和简略损伤量表对钝性或穿透性腹部损伤后行开腹手术的成人创伤患者进行鉴定。根据研究人群的IQR将HLOS分为三组:短期(< 5天)、中期(5-11天)和长期(10 -11天)。结果:共发现27 434例创伤剖腹手术患者。总中位HLOS为7.0(5.0,11.0)天。穿透机制,特别是刺伤,与短HLOS密切相关。此外,孤立的腹部创伤、脾损伤或脾相关手术更可能导致较短的HLOS。长期HLOS的患者有更高的院内并发症发生率,并且更频繁地由家庭保健服务或延伸护理机构出院。大多数合并症与较长的HLOS有关,而接受医疗补助或医疗保险的患者更有可能出现较长的HLOS。结论:尽管创伤人群相对均匀,但HLOS分布差异显著。基于HLOS的分层揭示了与短HLOS和长HLOS类别相关的不同因素,表明在当前医疗资源有限的时代,针对每个类别的有针对性的干预措施可能会降低HLOS并提高患者的预后。证据等级研究类型:四级,治疗/护理管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding hospital length of stay in trauma laparotomy patients: a National Trauma Database Study.

Introduction: The diverse procedures and varying patient conditions in trauma laparotomy cases lead to significant variability in hospital length of stay (HLOS), posing challenges for effective patient care. Strategies to reduce HLOS are varied, with multiple factors potentially modifiable through targeted interventions. These interventions are most effective when target populations and their associated factors are clearly defined. This study aimed to stratify trauma laparotomy patients by their HLOS and identify factors associated with HLOS to enhance patient care.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using the National Trauma Data Bank from January 2017 to December 2019. Adult trauma patients who underwent trauma laparotomy following blunt or penetrating abdominal injuries were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes and Abbreviated Injury Scales. HLOS was stratified into three groups based on the IQR of the study population: short (< 5 days), medium (5-11 days) and long (> 11 days).

Results: A total of 27 434 trauma laparotomy patients were identified. The overall median HLOS was 7.0 (5.0, 11.0) days. Penetrating mechanisms, particularly stab wounds, were strongly associated with a short HLOS. Additionally, isolated abdominal trauma, splenic injuries or spleen-related procedure were more likely to result in a short HLOS. Patients with a long HLOS experienced higher rates of in-hospital complications and were more frequently discharged to home with home health services or to extended care facilities. Most comorbidities were associated with a long HLOS, and patients with Medicaid or Medicare had a higher likelihood of a long HLOS.

Conclusion: Despite the relatively homogenous trauma population, HLOS distribution varied significantly. Stratification based on HLOS revealed distinct factors associated with short and long HLOS categories, indicating that targeted interventions for each category could potentially reduce HLOS and enhance patient outcomes in the current era of constrained healthcare resources.

Level of evidence study type: Level IV, therapeutic/care management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信