区域麻醉预防慢性术后疼痛的证据。

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Hesham Elsharkawy, J David Clark, Kariem El-Boghdadly
{"title":"区域麻醉预防慢性术后疼痛的证据。","authors":"Hesham Elsharkawy, J David Clark, Kariem El-Boghdadly","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) is a common adverse outcome following surgical procedures. Despite ongoing research, the risk factors and effective strategies for mitigating CPSP remain uncertain. Regional anesthesia is a potentially beneficial yet debated intervention for mitigating the risk of CPSP. This review will delve into the mechanistic aspects of regional anesthesia and critically assess the current literature to provide a thorough understanding of its role and effectiveness. The incidence and severity of CPSP are linked to nerve damage, neuroplastic changes and immunological responses. Although numerous mechanisms contributing to CPSP have been identified, translational research is sparse, and findings are often inconsistent. Evidence suggests that regional anesthetic techniques could have a role in reducing CPSP risk across various clinical scenarios. Techniques studied include wound infiltration, peripheral nerve blocks, fascial plane blocks, thoracic paravertebral blocks and epidural anesthesia. Current data indicate that epidural anesthesia might decrease CPSP risk following thoracotomy, wound infiltration may be effective after major breast surgery and cesarean delivery, and serratus anterior plane block or pectoralis/interpectoral plane blocks might be beneficial in breast surgery. However, the existing evidence is limited and marked by several constraints especially the multifactorial causes, underscoring the need for further research in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":"50 2","pages":"153-159"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence for regional anesthesia in preventing chronic postsurgical pain.\",\"authors\":\"Hesham Elsharkawy, J David Clark, Kariem El-Boghdadly\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rapm-2024-105611\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) is a common adverse outcome following surgical procedures. Despite ongoing research, the risk factors and effective strategies for mitigating CPSP remain uncertain. Regional anesthesia is a potentially beneficial yet debated intervention for mitigating the risk of CPSP. This review will delve into the mechanistic aspects of regional anesthesia and critically assess the current literature to provide a thorough understanding of its role and effectiveness. The incidence and severity of CPSP are linked to nerve damage, neuroplastic changes and immunological responses. Although numerous mechanisms contributing to CPSP have been identified, translational research is sparse, and findings are often inconsistent. Evidence suggests that regional anesthetic techniques could have a role in reducing CPSP risk across various clinical scenarios. Techniques studied include wound infiltration, peripheral nerve blocks, fascial plane blocks, thoracic paravertebral blocks and epidural anesthesia. Current data indicate that epidural anesthesia might decrease CPSP risk following thoracotomy, wound infiltration may be effective after major breast surgery and cesarean delivery, and serratus anterior plane block or pectoralis/interpectoral plane blocks might be beneficial in breast surgery. However, the existing evidence is limited and marked by several constraints especially the multifactorial causes, underscoring the need for further research in this area.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\"50 2\",\"pages\":\"153-159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105611\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105611","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

慢性术后疼痛(CPSP)是外科手术后常见的不良后果。尽管正在进行研究,但风险因素和减轻CPSP的有效策略仍然不确定。区域麻醉是一种潜在的有益干预措施,但仍存在争议,以减轻CPSP的风险。这篇综述将深入探讨区域麻醉的机制方面,并批判性地评估目前的文献,以提供对其作用和有效性的全面了解。CPSP的发生率和严重程度与神经损伤、神经可塑性改变和免疫反应有关。虽然已经确定了许多促成CPSP的机制,但转化研究很少,而且发现往往不一致。有证据表明,区域麻醉技术可以在各种临床情况下降低CPSP风险。研究的技术包括伤口浸润、周围神经阻滞、筋膜平面阻滞、胸椎旁阻滞和硬膜外麻醉。目前的数据显示硬膜外麻醉可以降低开胸术后CPSP的风险,切口浸润可能在乳房大手术和剖宫产后有效,胸前锯肌阻滞或胸肌/胸间肌阻滞可能在乳房手术中有益。然而,现有的证据是有限的,并且受到一些限制,特别是多因素原因,强调需要在这一领域进行进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evidence for regional anesthesia in preventing chronic postsurgical pain.

Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) is a common adverse outcome following surgical procedures. Despite ongoing research, the risk factors and effective strategies for mitigating CPSP remain uncertain. Regional anesthesia is a potentially beneficial yet debated intervention for mitigating the risk of CPSP. This review will delve into the mechanistic aspects of regional anesthesia and critically assess the current literature to provide a thorough understanding of its role and effectiveness. The incidence and severity of CPSP are linked to nerve damage, neuroplastic changes and immunological responses. Although numerous mechanisms contributing to CPSP have been identified, translational research is sparse, and findings are often inconsistent. Evidence suggests that regional anesthetic techniques could have a role in reducing CPSP risk across various clinical scenarios. Techniques studied include wound infiltration, peripheral nerve blocks, fascial plane blocks, thoracic paravertebral blocks and epidural anesthesia. Current data indicate that epidural anesthesia might decrease CPSP risk following thoracotomy, wound infiltration may be effective after major breast surgery and cesarean delivery, and serratus anterior plane block or pectoralis/interpectoral plane blocks might be beneficial in breast surgery. However, the existing evidence is limited and marked by several constraints especially the multifactorial causes, underscoring the need for further research in this area.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信