{"title":"消融与保守治疗甲状腺机能亢进Graves眼病:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Giada Cosentino, Giulia Lanzolla, Simone Comi, Maria Novella Maglionico, Chiara Posarelli, Dalì Antonia Ciampa, Francesca Menconi, Roberto Rocchi, Francesco Latrofa, Michele Figus, Ferruccio Santini, Michele Marinò","doi":"10.1089/thy.2024.0633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Treatment for Graves' hyperthyroidism (GH) in patients with Graves' orbitopathy (GO) remains a topic of debate. This study aimed to investigate the outcome of GO following glucocorticoids, depending on the chosen thyroid treatment. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This retrospective cohort study included 49 consecutive patients with GH and moderate-to-severe, active GO, as defined by the European Group on Graves' Orbitopathy guidelines. Twenty-four patients were treated with radioactive iodine (RAI) and 25 with methimazole (MMI). All patients were administered intravenous methylprednisolone. Follow-up visits occurred at weeks 24, 48, and 72. The primary endpoint was the overall outcome of GO at week 24. Response was defined as a change in at least two of the following eye features: reduction ≥1 point in clinical activity score; proptosis reduction ≥2 mm; eyelid aperture reduction ≥2 mm; increase in eye ductions ≥8 degrees. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Follow-up duration was 72 weeks for both groups (interquartile range 66-72 for RAI and 48-72 for MMI). The proportion of responders for week 24 overall GO outcome was greater in RAI (54.1% vs. 16%; odds ratio [OR] 6.2 [confidence interval (CI): 1.6-23.6], <i>p</i> = 0.0075), but it increased in MMI at weeks 48 and 72, with no differences between groups. There was a trend indicating a better response in RAI regarding individual eye features. Improvement in GO-specific quality of life questionnaire at week 24 was trendily more pronounced in RAI (responders 50% vs. 28% in MMI; OR = 2.5 [CI: 0.7-8.4], <i>p</i> = 0.11), although results were similar in both groups at later time points. At week 24, only one patient (4%) in RAI and three (12%) in MMI experienced worsening of GO. Fifty-nine adverse events were recorded among 36 patients, with no differences between groups, except for infections, which were more frequent in RAI (53.8% vs. 15.3% in MMI; OR = 6.41 [CI: 1.7-23.9], <i>p</i> = 0.0056). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> RAI appears to be associated with an earlier response of GO to intravenous glucocorticoids. In the long term, a conservative approach also seems to be effective. RAI appears to be relatively safe when patients are concurrently treated with glucocorticoids. However, randomized clinical trials are necessary to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":23016,"journal":{"name":"Thyroid","volume":" ","pages":"298-306"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ablative Versus Conservative Approach for Hyperthyroidism Treatment in Patients with Graves' Orbitopathy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Giada Cosentino, Giulia Lanzolla, Simone Comi, Maria Novella Maglionico, Chiara Posarelli, Dalì Antonia Ciampa, Francesca Menconi, Roberto Rocchi, Francesco Latrofa, Michele Figus, Ferruccio Santini, Michele Marinò\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/thy.2024.0633\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Treatment for Graves' hyperthyroidism (GH) in patients with Graves' orbitopathy (GO) remains a topic of debate. This study aimed to investigate the outcome of GO following glucocorticoids, depending on the chosen thyroid treatment. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This retrospective cohort study included 49 consecutive patients with GH and moderate-to-severe, active GO, as defined by the European Group on Graves' Orbitopathy guidelines. Twenty-four patients were treated with radioactive iodine (RAI) and 25 with methimazole (MMI). All patients were administered intravenous methylprednisolone. Follow-up visits occurred at weeks 24, 48, and 72. The primary endpoint was the overall outcome of GO at week 24. Response was defined as a change in at least two of the following eye features: reduction ≥1 point in clinical activity score; proptosis reduction ≥2 mm; eyelid aperture reduction ≥2 mm; increase in eye ductions ≥8 degrees. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Follow-up duration was 72 weeks for both groups (interquartile range 66-72 for RAI and 48-72 for MMI). The proportion of responders for week 24 overall GO outcome was greater in RAI (54.1% vs. 16%; odds ratio [OR] 6.2 [confidence interval (CI): 1.6-23.6], <i>p</i> = 0.0075), but it increased in MMI at weeks 48 and 72, with no differences between groups. There was a trend indicating a better response in RAI regarding individual eye features. Improvement in GO-specific quality of life questionnaire at week 24 was trendily more pronounced in RAI (responders 50% vs. 28% in MMI; OR = 2.5 [CI: 0.7-8.4], <i>p</i> = 0.11), although results were similar in both groups at later time points. At week 24, only one patient (4%) in RAI and three (12%) in MMI experienced worsening of GO. Fifty-nine adverse events were recorded among 36 patients, with no differences between groups, except for infections, which were more frequent in RAI (53.8% vs. 15.3% in MMI; OR = 6.41 [CI: 1.7-23.9], <i>p</i> = 0.0056). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> RAI appears to be associated with an earlier response of GO to intravenous glucocorticoids. In the long term, a conservative approach also seems to be effective. RAI appears to be relatively safe when patients are concurrently treated with glucocorticoids. However, randomized clinical trials are necessary to confirm these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thyroid\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"298-306\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thyroid\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2024.0633\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thyroid","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2024.0633","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:Graves眼病(GO)患者甲状腺功能亢进(GH)的治疗仍然是一个有争议的话题。本研究旨在调查糖皮质激素治疗后氧化石墨烯的结果,这取决于所选择的甲状腺治疗。方法:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了49例GH和中度至重度活动性GO的连续患者,这些患者的定义符合欧洲Graves眼病指南。24例采用放射性碘(RAI)治疗,25例采用甲巯咪唑(MMI)治疗。所有患者静脉注射甲基强的松龙。随访时间分别为第24、48和72周。主要终点是第24周GO的总体结果。缓解被定义为至少有以下两项眼部特征发生改变:临床活动评分降低≥1分;突出度≥2mm;眼睑孔径缩小≥2mm;眼导管升高≥8度。结果:两组随访时间均为72周(RAI为66-72周,MMI为48-72周)。RAI患者在第24周总体GO结果中应答者的比例更高(54.1% vs. 16%;优势比[OR]为6.2[置信区间(CI): 1.6-23.6], p = 0.0075],但在48周和72周时MMI增加,组间无差异。有一种趋势表明,RAI对个体眼睛特征的反应更好。第24周,go特异性生活质量问卷的改善在RAI中更为明显(应答者为50%,MMI为28%;OR = 2.5 [CI: 0.7-8.4], p = 0.11),但两组在较晚时间点的结果相似。在第24周,RAI患者中只有1例(4%)和MMI患者中只有3例(12%)出现GO恶化。36例患者中记录了59例不良事件,除感染外,组间无差异,感染在RAI中更常见(53.8%比15.3%);OR = 6.41 [CI: 1.7 ~ 23.9], p = 0.0056)。结论:RAI似乎与GO对静脉注射糖皮质激素的早期反应有关。从长远来看,保守的方法似乎也是有效的。当患者同时接受糖皮质激素治疗时,RAI似乎相对安全。然而,需要随机临床试验来证实这些发现。
Ablative Versus Conservative Approach for Hyperthyroidism Treatment in Patients with Graves' Orbitopathy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Background: Treatment for Graves' hyperthyroidism (GH) in patients with Graves' orbitopathy (GO) remains a topic of debate. This study aimed to investigate the outcome of GO following glucocorticoids, depending on the chosen thyroid treatment. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 49 consecutive patients with GH and moderate-to-severe, active GO, as defined by the European Group on Graves' Orbitopathy guidelines. Twenty-four patients were treated with radioactive iodine (RAI) and 25 with methimazole (MMI). All patients were administered intravenous methylprednisolone. Follow-up visits occurred at weeks 24, 48, and 72. The primary endpoint was the overall outcome of GO at week 24. Response was defined as a change in at least two of the following eye features: reduction ≥1 point in clinical activity score; proptosis reduction ≥2 mm; eyelid aperture reduction ≥2 mm; increase in eye ductions ≥8 degrees. Results: Follow-up duration was 72 weeks for both groups (interquartile range 66-72 for RAI and 48-72 for MMI). The proportion of responders for week 24 overall GO outcome was greater in RAI (54.1% vs. 16%; odds ratio [OR] 6.2 [confidence interval (CI): 1.6-23.6], p = 0.0075), but it increased in MMI at weeks 48 and 72, with no differences between groups. There was a trend indicating a better response in RAI regarding individual eye features. Improvement in GO-specific quality of life questionnaire at week 24 was trendily more pronounced in RAI (responders 50% vs. 28% in MMI; OR = 2.5 [CI: 0.7-8.4], p = 0.11), although results were similar in both groups at later time points. At week 24, only one patient (4%) in RAI and three (12%) in MMI experienced worsening of GO. Fifty-nine adverse events were recorded among 36 patients, with no differences between groups, except for infections, which were more frequent in RAI (53.8% vs. 15.3% in MMI; OR = 6.41 [CI: 1.7-23.9], p = 0.0056). Conclusions: RAI appears to be associated with an earlier response of GO to intravenous glucocorticoids. In the long term, a conservative approach also seems to be effective. RAI appears to be relatively safe when patients are concurrently treated with glucocorticoids. However, randomized clinical trials are necessary to confirm these findings.
期刊介绍:
This authoritative journal program, including the monthly flagship journal Thyroid, Clinical Thyroidology® (monthly), and VideoEndocrinology™ (quarterly), delivers in-depth coverage on topics from clinical application and primary care, to the latest advances in diagnostic imaging and surgical techniques and technologies, designed to optimize patient care and outcomes.
Thyroid is the leading, peer-reviewed resource for original articles, patient-focused reports, and translational research on thyroid cancer and all thyroid related diseases. The Journal delivers the latest findings on topics from primary care to clinical application, and is the exclusive source for the authoritative and updated American Thyroid Association (ATA) Guidelines for Managing Thyroid Disease.