提供门诊治疗而非住院治疗的潜力:2022年德国全国医院出院数据分析

IF 6.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Carolina Pioch, Reinhard Busse, Thomas Mansky, Ulrike Nimptsch
{"title":"提供门诊治疗而非住院治疗的潜力:2022年德国全国医院出院数据分析","authors":"Carolina Pioch, Reinhard Busse, Thomas Mansky, Ulrike Nimptsch","doi":"10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In an expert analysis by the IGES Institute, it was examined which inpatient hospital treatments could also be carried out on an outpatient basis. A method of determining the feasibility of performing any particular treatment in the outpatient setting based on routine documentation was proposed in the report. A new version of the German catalogue of operations that can be per - formed on an outpatient basis and other outpatient procedures (the AOP catalogue) was issued accordingly. In addition, sector-blind (hybrid DRG) reimbursement of selected treatments was introduced, i.e., the amount of the reimbursement is now the same regardless of whether the treatment is provided on an inpatient or outpatient basis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present analysis is based on German nationwide hospital discharge data from 2022. It was calculated how many inpatient treatments could have been carried out on an outpatient basis according to the criteria of the IGES report and the AOP catalogue, and how many cases would fall under hybrid DRGs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 14.8 million inpatient treatment cases (excluding deliveries and neonates), 7.2% were identified that might have been provided on an outpatient basis according to both models, and a total of 17.3% and 21.8%, respectively, according to the IGES model or the AOP catalogue. The estimated number of potential hybrid DRG cases was 153 000, or 1.0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both the IGES model and the AOP catalogue identified a relevant potential for providing treatment on an outpatient rather than inpatient basis. However, the overlap between the two approaches is small. Further development of the AOP catalogue appears necessary for the more accurate identification of treatment cases that can be provided in the outpatient setting. The extent to which the new AOP catalogue and hybrid DRG remuneration can promote the provision of outpatient rather than inpatient care will need to be determined in future analyses.</p>","PeriodicalId":11258,"journal":{"name":"Deutsches Arzteblatt international","volume":" Forthcoming","pages":"151-155"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Potential for Providing Treatment on an Outpatient Rather Than Inpatient Basis: A Nationwide Analysis of Hospital Discharge Data in Germany for the Year 2022.\",\"authors\":\"Carolina Pioch, Reinhard Busse, Thomas Mansky, Ulrike Nimptsch\",\"doi\":\"10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In an expert analysis by the IGES Institute, it was examined which inpatient hospital treatments could also be carried out on an outpatient basis. A method of determining the feasibility of performing any particular treatment in the outpatient setting based on routine documentation was proposed in the report. A new version of the German catalogue of operations that can be per - formed on an outpatient basis and other outpatient procedures (the AOP catalogue) was issued accordingly. In addition, sector-blind (hybrid DRG) reimbursement of selected treatments was introduced, i.e., the amount of the reimbursement is now the same regardless of whether the treatment is provided on an inpatient or outpatient basis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present analysis is based on German nationwide hospital discharge data from 2022. It was calculated how many inpatient treatments could have been carried out on an outpatient basis according to the criteria of the IGES report and the AOP catalogue, and how many cases would fall under hybrid DRGs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 14.8 million inpatient treatment cases (excluding deliveries and neonates), 7.2% were identified that might have been provided on an outpatient basis according to both models, and a total of 17.3% and 21.8%, respectively, according to the IGES model or the AOP catalogue. The estimated number of potential hybrid DRG cases was 153 000, or 1.0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both the IGES model and the AOP catalogue identified a relevant potential for providing treatment on an outpatient rather than inpatient basis. However, the overlap between the two approaches is small. Further development of the AOP catalogue appears necessary for the more accurate identification of treatment cases that can be provided in the outpatient setting. The extent to which the new AOP catalogue and hybrid DRG remuneration can promote the provision of outpatient rather than inpatient care will need to be determined in future analyses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Deutsches Arzteblatt international\",\"volume\":\" Forthcoming\",\"pages\":\"151-155\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Deutsches Arzteblatt international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0012\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deutsches Arzteblatt international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在IGES研究所的一项专家分析中,研究了哪些住院治疗也可以在门诊治疗的基础上进行。报告中提出了一种基于常规文件确定在门诊环境中执行任何特定治疗的可行性的方法。因此,可以在门诊和其他门诊程序的基础上进行的新版本的德语手术目录(AOP目录)发布了。此外,对选定的治疗实行了部门盲(混合DRG)报销制度,即现在报销金额是相同的,无论治疗是在住院还是门诊提供。方法:本分析基于德国2022年全国医院出院数据。根据IGES报告和AOP目录的标准,计算了在门诊基础上可以进行多少住院治疗,以及有多少病例属于混合DRGs。结果:在1480万例住院治疗病例(不包括分娩和新生儿)中,根据两种模型确定了7.2%的可能在门诊基础上提供,根据IGES模型或AOP目录分别为17.3%和21.8%。估计潜在混合型DRG病例数为15.3万例,占1.0%。结论:IGES模型和AOP目录都确定了在门诊而不是住院基础上提供治疗的相关潜力。然而,这两种方法之间的重叠很小。进一步发展AOP目录对于更准确地识别可以在门诊环境中提供的治疗病例似乎是必要的。在何种程度上,新的AOP目录和混合DRG报酬可以促进提供门诊而不是住院护理将需要在未来的分析中确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Potential for Providing Treatment on an Outpatient Rather Than Inpatient Basis: A Nationwide Analysis of Hospital Discharge Data in Germany for the Year 2022.

Background: In an expert analysis by the IGES Institute, it was examined which inpatient hospital treatments could also be carried out on an outpatient basis. A method of determining the feasibility of performing any particular treatment in the outpatient setting based on routine documentation was proposed in the report. A new version of the German catalogue of operations that can be per - formed on an outpatient basis and other outpatient procedures (the AOP catalogue) was issued accordingly. In addition, sector-blind (hybrid DRG) reimbursement of selected treatments was introduced, i.e., the amount of the reimbursement is now the same regardless of whether the treatment is provided on an inpatient or outpatient basis.

Methods: The present analysis is based on German nationwide hospital discharge data from 2022. It was calculated how many inpatient treatments could have been carried out on an outpatient basis according to the criteria of the IGES report and the AOP catalogue, and how many cases would fall under hybrid DRGs.

Results: Of 14.8 million inpatient treatment cases (excluding deliveries and neonates), 7.2% were identified that might have been provided on an outpatient basis according to both models, and a total of 17.3% and 21.8%, respectively, according to the IGES model or the AOP catalogue. The estimated number of potential hybrid DRG cases was 153 000, or 1.0%.

Conclusion: Both the IGES model and the AOP catalogue identified a relevant potential for providing treatment on an outpatient rather than inpatient basis. However, the overlap between the two approaches is small. Further development of the AOP catalogue appears necessary for the more accurate identification of treatment cases that can be provided in the outpatient setting. The extent to which the new AOP catalogue and hybrid DRG remuneration can promote the provision of outpatient rather than inpatient care will need to be determined in future analyses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Deutsches Arzteblatt international
Deutsches Arzteblatt international 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.20%
发文量
306
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Deutsches Ärzteblatt International is a bilingual (German and English) weekly online journal that focuses on clinical medicine and public health. It serves as the official publication for both the German Medical Association and the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. The journal is dedicated to publishing independent, peer-reviewed articles that cover a wide range of clinical medicine disciplines. It also features editorials and a dedicated section for scientific discussion, known as correspondence. The journal aims to provide valuable medical information to its international readership and offers insights into the German medical landscape. Since its launch in January 2008, Deutsches Ärzteblatt International has been recognized and included in several prestigious databases, which helps to ensure its content is accessible and credible to the global medical community. These databases include: Carelit CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) Compendex DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals) EMBASE (Excerpta Medica database) EMNursing GEOBASE (Geoscience & Environmental Data) HINARI (Health InterNetwork Access to Research Initiative) Index Copernicus Medline (MEDLARS Online) Medpilot PsycINFO (Psychological Information Database) Science Citation Index Expanded Scopus By being indexed in these databases, Deutsches Ärzteblatt International's articles are made available to researchers, clinicians, and healthcare professionals worldwide, contributing to the global exchange of medical knowledge and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信