老年患者罗库溴铵或苏沙霉素快速序列诱导时的插管条件。一项随机研究。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Matias Vested, Andreas Creutzburg, Christian S Meyhoff, Marie Louise Rovsing, Tatiana Nielsen, Fabio Rosa, Eske K Aasvang, Hannah Mollerup, Thomas Fuchs-Buder, Lars Simon Rasmussen
{"title":"老年患者罗库溴铵或苏沙霉素快速序列诱导时的插管条件。一项随机研究。","authors":"Matias Vested, Andreas Creutzburg, Christian S Meyhoff, Marie Louise Rovsing, Tatiana Nielsen, Fabio Rosa, Eske K Aasvang, Hannah Mollerup, Thomas Fuchs-Buder, Lars Simon Rasmussen","doi":"10.1111/aas.14589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During rapid sequence induction, either rocuronium 1.0 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> or suxamethonium 1.0 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> can be administered to facilitate endotracheal intubation. We hypothezised that rocuronium provided a larger proportion of excellent intubating conditions compared to suxamethonium in elderly patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 90 patients 80 years or above with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical health Classes I-IV, and a body mass index < 35 kg m<sup>-1-2</sup> were randomised to either rocuronium 1.0 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> or suxamethonium 1.0 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> during rapid sequence induction with intubation using a video laryngoscope. After 60 s, tracheal intubating conditions were evaluated using the Fuchs-Buder scale by a blinded investigator, and the primary outcome was the proportion of patients with excellent intubating conditions. Further outcomes included first pass success rate, intubating conditions according to the intubating difficulty scale (IDS), onset time and postoperative occurrence of muscle soreness, hoarseness and sore throat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients were evaluated for the primary outcome. Excellent intubating conditions occurred in 36 patients (73%) versus 31 (75%) in the rocuronium group and suxamethonium group, respectively (95% confidence interval [CI]: -16 to 20) (p = .82). The first pass success rate was 48 (98%) versus 40 (98%) comparing the rocuronium group with the suxamethonium group, respectively (p = .90). No difference in IDS score was found; median 0 (interquartile ranges [IQR]: 0-1) versus median 0 (IQR: 0-1) (p = .48). Onset time was significantly shorter in the suxamethonium group 99 versus 131 s (p = .01) (95% CI: 7 to 57). Finally, no difference was found in the occurrence of muscle soreness, hoarseness or sore throat postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No important difference in intubating conditions was found during rapid sequence induction after the administration of either rocuronium 1.0 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> or suxamethonium 1.0 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> in patients 80 years or above.</p><p><strong>Editorial comment: </strong>This reports a superiority trial comparing standardised doses of rocuronium and suxamethonium at 60 s for quality of intubating conditions in the rapid sequence context, and this in an elderly cohort. The findings showed no difference between the drugs concerning intubation outcomes, though the onset or time to peak effect was shorter for suxamethonium, again demonstrated in a cohort 80 years old or older.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":"69 3","pages":"e14589"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11798891/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intubating conditions during rapid sequence induction with either rocuronium or suxamethonium in elderly patients. A randomised study.\",\"authors\":\"Matias Vested, Andreas Creutzburg, Christian S Meyhoff, Marie Louise Rovsing, Tatiana Nielsen, Fabio Rosa, Eske K Aasvang, Hannah Mollerup, Thomas Fuchs-Buder, Lars Simon Rasmussen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aas.14589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During rapid sequence induction, either rocuronium 1.0 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> or suxamethonium 1.0 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> can be administered to facilitate endotracheal intubation. We hypothezised that rocuronium provided a larger proportion of excellent intubating conditions compared to suxamethonium in elderly patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 90 patients 80 years or above with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical health Classes I-IV, and a body mass index < 35 kg m<sup>-1-2</sup> were randomised to either rocuronium 1.0 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> or suxamethonium 1.0 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> during rapid sequence induction with intubation using a video laryngoscope. After 60 s, tracheal intubating conditions were evaluated using the Fuchs-Buder scale by a blinded investigator, and the primary outcome was the proportion of patients with excellent intubating conditions. Further outcomes included first pass success rate, intubating conditions according to the intubating difficulty scale (IDS), onset time and postoperative occurrence of muscle soreness, hoarseness and sore throat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients were evaluated for the primary outcome. Excellent intubating conditions occurred in 36 patients (73%) versus 31 (75%) in the rocuronium group and suxamethonium group, respectively (95% confidence interval [CI]: -16 to 20) (p = .82). The first pass success rate was 48 (98%) versus 40 (98%) comparing the rocuronium group with the suxamethonium group, respectively (p = .90). No difference in IDS score was found; median 0 (interquartile ranges [IQR]: 0-1) versus median 0 (IQR: 0-1) (p = .48). Onset time was significantly shorter in the suxamethonium group 99 versus 131 s (p = .01) (95% CI: 7 to 57). Finally, no difference was found in the occurrence of muscle soreness, hoarseness or sore throat postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No important difference in intubating conditions was found during rapid sequence induction after the administration of either rocuronium 1.0 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> or suxamethonium 1.0 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> in patients 80 years or above.</p><p><strong>Editorial comment: </strong>This reports a superiority trial comparing standardised doses of rocuronium and suxamethonium at 60 s for quality of intubating conditions in the rapid sequence context, and this in an elderly cohort. The findings showed no difference between the drugs concerning intubation outcomes, though the onset or time to peak effect was shorter for suxamethonium, again demonstrated in a cohort 80 years old or older.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\"69 3\",\"pages\":\"e14589\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11798891/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14589\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14589","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在快速序列诱导过程中,罗库溴铵1.0 mg kg-1或苏沙莫铵1.0 mg kg-1均可用于气管插管。我们假设在老年患者中,罗库溴铵比苏沙霉素提供了更大比例的良好插管条件。方法:90例80岁及以上、美国麻醉医师学会身体健康等级为I-IV级、体重指数为-1-2的患者在视频喉镜下快速序贯诱导时随机分为罗库溴铵1.0 mg kg-1组和苏沙莫铵1.0 mg kg-1组。60岁后,由盲法研究者采用Fuchs-Buder量表评估气管插管情况,主要观察指标为气管插管情况良好的患者比例。进一步的结果包括首次通过成功率、插管困难量表(IDS)的插管条件、发病时间和术后肌肉酸痛、声音嘶哑和喉咙痛的发生情况。结果:所有患者均进行了主要预后评估。罗库溴铵组和苏沙霉素组插管情况良好的患者分别为36例(73%)和31例(75%)(95%可信区间[CI]: -16 ~ 20) (p = .82)。罗库溴铵组和苏沙霉素组的首次通过率分别为48(98%)和40 (98%)(p = 0.90)。IDS评分差异无统计学意义;中位数0(四分位数间距[IQR]: 0-1)与中位数0 (IQR: 0-1) (p = 0.48)。suxamethonium组的起效时间明显短于131 s (p = 0.01) (95% CI: 7 ~ 57)。最后,在术后肌肉酸痛、声音嘶哑或喉咙痛的发生方面没有发现差异。结论:80岁及以上患者应用罗库溴铵1.0 mg kg-1与苏沙莫铵1.0 mg kg-1后,快速序列诱导时插管情况无显著差异。编者按:这篇报道了一项优越性试验,比较了60秒时标准剂量的罗库溴铵和苏沙莫铵在快速序列背景下的插管条件质量,该试验在老年队列中进行。研究结果显示,两种药物在插管结果方面没有差异,尽管suxamethonium的发病时间或达到峰值的时间更短,这再次在80岁或以上的队列中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intubating conditions during rapid sequence induction with either rocuronium or suxamethonium in elderly patients. A randomised study.

Background: During rapid sequence induction, either rocuronium 1.0 mg kg-1 or suxamethonium 1.0 mg kg-1 can be administered to facilitate endotracheal intubation. We hypothezised that rocuronium provided a larger proportion of excellent intubating conditions compared to suxamethonium in elderly patients.

Methods: A total of 90 patients 80 years or above with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical health Classes I-IV, and a body mass index < 35 kg m-1-2 were randomised to either rocuronium 1.0 mg kg-1 or suxamethonium 1.0 mg kg-1 during rapid sequence induction with intubation using a video laryngoscope. After 60 s, tracheal intubating conditions were evaluated using the Fuchs-Buder scale by a blinded investigator, and the primary outcome was the proportion of patients with excellent intubating conditions. Further outcomes included first pass success rate, intubating conditions according to the intubating difficulty scale (IDS), onset time and postoperative occurrence of muscle soreness, hoarseness and sore throat.

Results: All patients were evaluated for the primary outcome. Excellent intubating conditions occurred in 36 patients (73%) versus 31 (75%) in the rocuronium group and suxamethonium group, respectively (95% confidence interval [CI]: -16 to 20) (p = .82). The first pass success rate was 48 (98%) versus 40 (98%) comparing the rocuronium group with the suxamethonium group, respectively (p = .90). No difference in IDS score was found; median 0 (interquartile ranges [IQR]: 0-1) versus median 0 (IQR: 0-1) (p = .48). Onset time was significantly shorter in the suxamethonium group 99 versus 131 s (p = .01) (95% CI: 7 to 57). Finally, no difference was found in the occurrence of muscle soreness, hoarseness or sore throat postoperatively.

Conclusion: No important difference in intubating conditions was found during rapid sequence induction after the administration of either rocuronium 1.0 mg kg-1 or suxamethonium 1.0 mg kg-1 in patients 80 years or above.

Editorial comment: This reports a superiority trial comparing standardised doses of rocuronium and suxamethonium at 60 s for quality of intubating conditions in the rapid sequence context, and this in an elderly cohort. The findings showed no difference between the drugs concerning intubation outcomes, though the onset or time to peak effect was shorter for suxamethonium, again demonstrated in a cohort 80 years old or older.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信