Matias Vested, Andreas Creutzburg, Christian S Meyhoff, Marie Louise Rovsing, Tatiana Nielsen, Fabio Rosa, Eske K Aasvang, Hannah Mollerup, Thomas Fuchs-Buder, Lars Simon Rasmussen
{"title":"老年患者罗库溴铵或苏沙霉素快速序列诱导时的插管条件。一项随机研究。","authors":"Matias Vested, Andreas Creutzburg, Christian S Meyhoff, Marie Louise Rovsing, Tatiana Nielsen, Fabio Rosa, Eske K Aasvang, Hannah Mollerup, Thomas Fuchs-Buder, Lars Simon Rasmussen","doi":"10.1111/aas.14589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During rapid sequence induction, either rocuronium 1.0 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> or suxamethonium 1.0 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> can be administered to facilitate endotracheal intubation. We hypothezised that rocuronium provided a larger proportion of excellent intubating conditions compared to suxamethonium in elderly patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 90 patients 80 years or above with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical health Classes I-IV, and a body mass index < 35 kg m<sup>-1-2</sup> were randomised to either rocuronium 1.0 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> or suxamethonium 1.0 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> during rapid sequence induction with intubation using a video laryngoscope. After 60 s, tracheal intubating conditions were evaluated using the Fuchs-Buder scale by a blinded investigator, and the primary outcome was the proportion of patients with excellent intubating conditions. Further outcomes included first pass success rate, intubating conditions according to the intubating difficulty scale (IDS), onset time and postoperative occurrence of muscle soreness, hoarseness and sore throat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients were evaluated for the primary outcome. Excellent intubating conditions occurred in 36 patients (73%) versus 31 (75%) in the rocuronium group and suxamethonium group, respectively (95% confidence interval [CI]: -16 to 20) (p = .82). The first pass success rate was 48 (98%) versus 40 (98%) comparing the rocuronium group with the suxamethonium group, respectively (p = .90). No difference in IDS score was found; median 0 (interquartile ranges [IQR]: 0-1) versus median 0 (IQR: 0-1) (p = .48). Onset time was significantly shorter in the suxamethonium group 99 versus 131 s (p = .01) (95% CI: 7 to 57). Finally, no difference was found in the occurrence of muscle soreness, hoarseness or sore throat postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No important difference in intubating conditions was found during rapid sequence induction after the administration of either rocuronium 1.0 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> or suxamethonium 1.0 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> in patients 80 years or above.</p><p><strong>Editorial comment: </strong>This reports a superiority trial comparing standardised doses of rocuronium and suxamethonium at 60 s for quality of intubating conditions in the rapid sequence context, and this in an elderly cohort. The findings showed no difference between the drugs concerning intubation outcomes, though the onset or time to peak effect was shorter for suxamethonium, again demonstrated in a cohort 80 years old or older.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":"69 3","pages":"e14589"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11798891/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intubating conditions during rapid sequence induction with either rocuronium or suxamethonium in elderly patients. A randomised study.\",\"authors\":\"Matias Vested, Andreas Creutzburg, Christian S Meyhoff, Marie Louise Rovsing, Tatiana Nielsen, Fabio Rosa, Eske K Aasvang, Hannah Mollerup, Thomas Fuchs-Buder, Lars Simon Rasmussen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aas.14589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During rapid sequence induction, either rocuronium 1.0 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> or suxamethonium 1.0 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> can be administered to facilitate endotracheal intubation. We hypothezised that rocuronium provided a larger proportion of excellent intubating conditions compared to suxamethonium in elderly patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 90 patients 80 years or above with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical health Classes I-IV, and a body mass index < 35 kg m<sup>-1-2</sup> were randomised to either rocuronium 1.0 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> or suxamethonium 1.0 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> during rapid sequence induction with intubation using a video laryngoscope. After 60 s, tracheal intubating conditions were evaluated using the Fuchs-Buder scale by a blinded investigator, and the primary outcome was the proportion of patients with excellent intubating conditions. Further outcomes included first pass success rate, intubating conditions according to the intubating difficulty scale (IDS), onset time and postoperative occurrence of muscle soreness, hoarseness and sore throat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients were evaluated for the primary outcome. Excellent intubating conditions occurred in 36 patients (73%) versus 31 (75%) in the rocuronium group and suxamethonium group, respectively (95% confidence interval [CI]: -16 to 20) (p = .82). The first pass success rate was 48 (98%) versus 40 (98%) comparing the rocuronium group with the suxamethonium group, respectively (p = .90). No difference in IDS score was found; median 0 (interquartile ranges [IQR]: 0-1) versus median 0 (IQR: 0-1) (p = .48). Onset time was significantly shorter in the suxamethonium group 99 versus 131 s (p = .01) (95% CI: 7 to 57). Finally, no difference was found in the occurrence of muscle soreness, hoarseness or sore throat postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No important difference in intubating conditions was found during rapid sequence induction after the administration of either rocuronium 1.0 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> or suxamethonium 1.0 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> in patients 80 years or above.</p><p><strong>Editorial comment: </strong>This reports a superiority trial comparing standardised doses of rocuronium and suxamethonium at 60 s for quality of intubating conditions in the rapid sequence context, and this in an elderly cohort. The findings showed no difference between the drugs concerning intubation outcomes, though the onset or time to peak effect was shorter for suxamethonium, again demonstrated in a cohort 80 years old or older.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\"69 3\",\"pages\":\"e14589\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11798891/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14589\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14589","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Intubating conditions during rapid sequence induction with either rocuronium or suxamethonium in elderly patients. A randomised study.
Background: During rapid sequence induction, either rocuronium 1.0 mg kg-1 or suxamethonium 1.0 mg kg-1 can be administered to facilitate endotracheal intubation. We hypothezised that rocuronium provided a larger proportion of excellent intubating conditions compared to suxamethonium in elderly patients.
Methods: A total of 90 patients 80 years or above with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical health Classes I-IV, and a body mass index < 35 kg m-1-2 were randomised to either rocuronium 1.0 mg kg-1 or suxamethonium 1.0 mg kg-1 during rapid sequence induction with intubation using a video laryngoscope. After 60 s, tracheal intubating conditions were evaluated using the Fuchs-Buder scale by a blinded investigator, and the primary outcome was the proportion of patients with excellent intubating conditions. Further outcomes included first pass success rate, intubating conditions according to the intubating difficulty scale (IDS), onset time and postoperative occurrence of muscle soreness, hoarseness and sore throat.
Results: All patients were evaluated for the primary outcome. Excellent intubating conditions occurred in 36 patients (73%) versus 31 (75%) in the rocuronium group and suxamethonium group, respectively (95% confidence interval [CI]: -16 to 20) (p = .82). The first pass success rate was 48 (98%) versus 40 (98%) comparing the rocuronium group with the suxamethonium group, respectively (p = .90). No difference in IDS score was found; median 0 (interquartile ranges [IQR]: 0-1) versus median 0 (IQR: 0-1) (p = .48). Onset time was significantly shorter in the suxamethonium group 99 versus 131 s (p = .01) (95% CI: 7 to 57). Finally, no difference was found in the occurrence of muscle soreness, hoarseness or sore throat postoperatively.
Conclusion: No important difference in intubating conditions was found during rapid sequence induction after the administration of either rocuronium 1.0 mg kg-1 or suxamethonium 1.0 mg kg-1 in patients 80 years or above.
Editorial comment: This reports a superiority trial comparing standardised doses of rocuronium and suxamethonium at 60 s for quality of intubating conditions in the rapid sequence context, and this in an elderly cohort. The findings showed no difference between the drugs concerning intubation outcomes, though the onset or time to peak effect was shorter for suxamethonium, again demonstrated in a cohort 80 years old or older.
期刊介绍:
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.