消费者金融服务中信任驱动因素的实证探索

Jason M. Pattit, Katherina G. Pattit
{"title":"消费者金融服务中信任驱动因素的实证探索","authors":"Jason M. Pattit,&nbsp;Katherina G. Pattit","doi":"10.1002/cfp2.1190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Studies on trust in financial institutions are scattered across the literature and the results are often inconsistent, highlighting the need for additional investigation. Thus, relying on 1697 responses to a self-administered online questionnaire from consumers aged 18 or older in the U.S., we empirically examined several of these inconsistencies. Specifically, we explored how trust differs between seven types of financial services providers and between “customers” and “familiar non-customers” for each provider type. We also investigated how sociodemographic characteristics, generalized trust, previous experience, and the behavior and characteristics of financial services providers impact trust in different types of providers for “customers” versus “familiar non-customers.” Our results show that trust ratings differ across providers and between “customers” and “familiar non-customer” for the same provider type. Our results also show that there are distinct drivers of trust for “familiar non-customers” and “customers.” Indicators of reputation are important drivers of trust for “familiar non-customers,” especially for online-only financial companies. Shared values, interest protection, and personalized service are important drivers of trust for “customers,” especially for investment/brokerage firms, national banks, and credit unions. Taken together, these findings can help researchers and practitioners to better design marketing strategies geared toward building, maintaining, and repairing trust.</p>","PeriodicalId":100529,"journal":{"name":"FINANCIAL PLANNING REVIEW","volume":"7 3-4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An empirical exploration of the drivers of trust in consumer financial services\",\"authors\":\"Jason M. Pattit,&nbsp;Katherina G. Pattit\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cfp2.1190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Studies on trust in financial institutions are scattered across the literature and the results are often inconsistent, highlighting the need for additional investigation. Thus, relying on 1697 responses to a self-administered online questionnaire from consumers aged 18 or older in the U.S., we empirically examined several of these inconsistencies. Specifically, we explored how trust differs between seven types of financial services providers and between “customers” and “familiar non-customers” for each provider type. We also investigated how sociodemographic characteristics, generalized trust, previous experience, and the behavior and characteristics of financial services providers impact trust in different types of providers for “customers” versus “familiar non-customers.” Our results show that trust ratings differ across providers and between “customers” and “familiar non-customer” for the same provider type. Our results also show that there are distinct drivers of trust for “familiar non-customers” and “customers.” Indicators of reputation are important drivers of trust for “familiar non-customers,” especially for online-only financial companies. Shared values, interest protection, and personalized service are important drivers of trust for “customers,” especially for investment/brokerage firms, national banks, and credit unions. Taken together, these findings can help researchers and practitioners to better design marketing strategies geared toward building, maintaining, and repairing trust.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FINANCIAL PLANNING REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"7 3-4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FINANCIAL PLANNING REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cfp2.1190\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FINANCIAL PLANNING REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cfp2.1190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于金融机构信任的研究分散在文献中,结果往往不一致,突出了进一步调查的必要性。因此,依靠1697份来自美国18岁或以上消费者的自我管理在线问卷的回复,我们实证地检查了这些不一致的几个。具体而言,我们探讨了七种类型的金融服务提供商之间的信任差异,以及每种提供商类型的“客户”和“熟悉的非客户”之间的信任差异。我们还调查了社会人口学特征、普遍信任、以前的经验、金融服务提供者的行为和特征如何影响对不同类型的“客户”和“熟悉的非客户”的信任。我们的研究结果表明,对于同一类型的供应商,信任评级在供应商之间以及“客户”和“熟悉的非客户”之间存在差异。我们的研究结果还表明,“熟悉的非客户”和“客户”之间存在不同的信任驱动因素。对于“熟悉的非客户”来说,声誉指标是重要的信任驱动因素,特别是对于只提供在线服务的金融公司。共同的价值观、利益保护和个性化服务是“客户”信任的重要驱动因素,特别是对投资/经纪公司、国家银行和信用合作社而言。综上所述,这些发现可以帮助研究者和实践者更好地设计面向建立、维持和修复信任的营销策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An empirical exploration of the drivers of trust in consumer financial services

Studies on trust in financial institutions are scattered across the literature and the results are often inconsistent, highlighting the need for additional investigation. Thus, relying on 1697 responses to a self-administered online questionnaire from consumers aged 18 or older in the U.S., we empirically examined several of these inconsistencies. Specifically, we explored how trust differs between seven types of financial services providers and between “customers” and “familiar non-customers” for each provider type. We also investigated how sociodemographic characteristics, generalized trust, previous experience, and the behavior and characteristics of financial services providers impact trust in different types of providers for “customers” versus “familiar non-customers.” Our results show that trust ratings differ across providers and between “customers” and “familiar non-customer” for the same provider type. Our results also show that there are distinct drivers of trust for “familiar non-customers” and “customers.” Indicators of reputation are important drivers of trust for “familiar non-customers,” especially for online-only financial companies. Shared values, interest protection, and personalized service are important drivers of trust for “customers,” especially for investment/brokerage firms, national banks, and credit unions. Taken together, these findings can help researchers and practitioners to better design marketing strategies geared toward building, maintaining, and repairing trust.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信