超越情感:马丁·路德的《圣贤》与朱熹的《澄经》比较研究

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Zhang Jun
{"title":"超越情感:马丁·路德的《圣贤》与朱熹的《澄经》比较研究","authors":"Zhang Jun","doi":"10.1111/dial.12864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Both Martin Luther's <i>pietas</i> and Zhu Xi's <i>Cheng-Jing</i> are not purely empirical emotional categories, but transcendent emotional categories of faith. By comparing Luther's <i>pietas</i> and Zhu Xi's <i>Cheng-Jing</i>, this article reveals how Christianity and Confucianism constructed individual emotional and spiritual transcendence in early modernity. By doing so, it highlights both similarities and fundamental differences between Neo-Confucianism and Protestantism in matters of faith, thus revealing their significance for modern society.</p>","PeriodicalId":42769,"journal":{"name":"Dialog-A Journal of Theology","volume":"63 3","pages":"79-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transcendent emotions: A comparative study of Martin Luther's pietas and Zhu Xi's Cheng-Jing\",\"authors\":\"Zhang Jun\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dial.12864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Both Martin Luther's <i>pietas</i> and Zhu Xi's <i>Cheng-Jing</i> are not purely empirical emotional categories, but transcendent emotional categories of faith. By comparing Luther's <i>pietas</i> and Zhu Xi's <i>Cheng-Jing</i>, this article reveals how Christianity and Confucianism constructed individual emotional and spiritual transcendence in early modernity. By doing so, it highlights both similarities and fundamental differences between Neo-Confucianism and Protestantism in matters of faith, thus revealing their significance for modern society.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dialog-A Journal of Theology\",\"volume\":\"63 3\",\"pages\":\"79-86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dialog-A Journal of Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dial.12864\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialog-A Journal of Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dial.12864","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

马丁·路德的圣心经和朱熹的《正经》都不是纯粹的经验情感范畴,而是信仰的先验情感范畴。本文通过对路德的《圣心经》和朱熹的《澄经》的比较,揭示了基督教和儒家如何在现代性早期建构个体的情感和精神超越。通过这样做,它突出了新儒学和新教在信仰问题上的相似之处和根本差异,从而揭示了它们对现代社会的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transcendent emotions: A comparative study of Martin Luther's pietas and Zhu Xi's Cheng-Jing

Both Martin Luther's pietas and Zhu Xi's Cheng-Jing are not purely empirical emotional categories, but transcendent emotional categories of faith. By comparing Luther's pietas and Zhu Xi's Cheng-Jing, this article reveals how Christianity and Confucianism constructed individual emotional and spiritual transcendence in early modernity. By doing so, it highlights both similarities and fundamental differences between Neo-Confucianism and Protestantism in matters of faith, thus revealing their significance for modern society.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信