2019冠状病毒病危机期间的欧盟委员会:是否试图赋权?

IF 3.3 1区 社会学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Gijs Jan Brandsma, Jens Blom-Hansen
{"title":"2019冠状病毒病危机期间的欧盟委员会:是否试图赋权?","authors":"Gijs Jan Brandsma,&nbsp;Jens Blom-Hansen","doi":"10.1111/jcms.13627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We argue that the European Commission, like national governments, is likely to have used the Covid-19 crisis as an opportunity to bolster its own powers. We focus on the Commission's attempts to insert into legal proposals provisions to adopt delegated or implementing acts, as this is the only possible way to gain lasting rule-making powers. We analyse all the Commission's legal proposals for an equal time span before and after the start of the Covid-19 crisis and study whether the number of proposed delegation provisions has changed after the onset of the crisis. The analysis, to our surprise, does not show any clear evidence of a self-empowerment strategy. In the conclusion, we discuss likely explanations for this non-finding.</p>","PeriodicalId":51369,"journal":{"name":"Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies","volume":"63 2","pages":"438-466"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jcms.13627","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The EU Commission During the Covid-19 Crisis: Attempts at Self-Empowerment, or Not?\",\"authors\":\"Gijs Jan Brandsma,&nbsp;Jens Blom-Hansen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jcms.13627\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We argue that the European Commission, like national governments, is likely to have used the Covid-19 crisis as an opportunity to bolster its own powers. We focus on the Commission's attempts to insert into legal proposals provisions to adopt delegated or implementing acts, as this is the only possible way to gain lasting rule-making powers. We analyse all the Commission's legal proposals for an equal time span before and after the start of the Covid-19 crisis and study whether the number of proposed delegation provisions has changed after the onset of the crisis. The analysis, to our surprise, does not show any clear evidence of a self-empowerment strategy. In the conclusion, we discuss likely explanations for this non-finding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies\",\"volume\":\"63 2\",\"pages\":\"438-466\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jcms.13627\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcms.13627\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcms.13627","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们认为,欧盟委员会和各国政府一样,很可能利用新冠肺炎危机作为加强自身权力的机会。我们的重点是委员会试图在法律提案中加入通过授权或执行行为的条款,因为这是获得持久规则制定权力的唯一可能途径。我们分析了在2019冠状病毒病危机开始前后相同时间跨度内欧盟委员会的所有法律提案,并研究拟议授权条款的数量在危机爆发后是否发生了变化。令我们惊讶的是,分析并没有显示出任何自我赋权策略的明确证据。在结论中,我们讨论了这一未发现的可能解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The EU Commission During the Covid-19 Crisis: Attempts at Self-Empowerment, or Not?

We argue that the European Commission, like national governments, is likely to have used the Covid-19 crisis as an opportunity to bolster its own powers. We focus on the Commission's attempts to insert into legal proposals provisions to adopt delegated or implementing acts, as this is the only possible way to gain lasting rule-making powers. We analyse all the Commission's legal proposals for an equal time span before and after the start of the Covid-19 crisis and study whether the number of proposed delegation provisions has changed after the onset of the crisis. The analysis, to our surprise, does not show any clear evidence of a self-empowerment strategy. In the conclusion, we discuss likely explanations for this non-finding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
137
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信