支持病人护理的临床药学服务

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Michael J. Dooley BPharm, GradDipHospPharm, PhD, FSHP
{"title":"支持病人护理的临床药学服务","authors":"Michael J. Dooley BPharm, GradDipHospPharm, PhD, FSHP","doi":"10.1002/jppr.1968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this issue of the <i>Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research</i> we have new Clinical Pharmacy Standards for the profession.<span><sup>1</sup></span> It has been a pleasure to work alongside so many others to help bring this important consensus document together and to have been involved in the earlier versions. The first comprehensive standard of practice for clinical pharmacy was published by the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia in 1996 with updated versions subsequently released in 2005 and 2015.<span><sup>2-4</sup></span></p><p>As practice has evolved over time the new <i>Advanced Pharmacy Australia Clinical Pharmacy Standards</i><span><sup>1</sup></span> have been adapted to incorporate a greater focus on describing the key quality elements for practice as well as focus on person centred care and interdisciplinary practice whilst proving guidance on prioritisation of the clinical pharmacy services.</p><p>The accompanying editorial authored by Advanced Pharmacy Australia President Tom Simpson shares his views on the importance of this work and described the Standards as a blueprint for patient care and an ‘instruction manual’ for how to design, implement, and measure the clinical pharmacy services that underpin contemporary medicines management.<span><sup>5</sup></span> Dr Danielle McMullen, the President of the Australian Medical Association, describes the importance of collaboration between professions and the vision to implement innovative models of care safely, to improve patient outcomes and the experience as practitioner.<span><sup>6</sup></span> This perspective from our medical colleagues is vital as it reinforces one of the key principles in our Standards; that interprofessional collaboration is essential to the delivery of efficient and effective person-centred care.</p><p>These Standards provide a framework and guidance for comprehensive and accountable clinical pharmacy services. The underpinning principle is to describe current best practice to support the basic rights of patients when accessing healthcare services, including access, safety, respect, partnership, information, privacy, and the right to give feedback. Comprehensive and accountable clinical pharmacy services are an essential component of contemporary health care. The challenge has been to describe the quality of practice for clinical pharmacy services in Australia, irrespective of service type (private and public hospitals, inpatients, outpatients or community-based services) or location (metropolitan, regional, rural, or remote).</p><p>A fundamental component of these Standards has been to provide clear guidance for the pharmacy workforce, which encompasses pharmacists, but also includes pharmacy technicians and assistants who play a pivotal role in the care provided. The scope of practice and role delineation between the professional scope of practice of pharmacists and that of pharmacy technicians and assistants required significant consideration. The basis of this was the underpinning principle that the scope of clinical practice is defined as the professional activities that a pharmacist is educated in (skills/knowledge), competent and authorised to perform, and for which they are accountable. Consequently, the scope of clinical practice when referred to in these Standards, relates to the clinical practice provided by pharmacists exercising their professional judgement.</p><p>As with all healthcare professions, pharmacists must be supported to practice at their full scope. Activities that do not require professional judgement can be undertaken by any member of the pharmacy workforce who has received the appropriate evidence-informed pharmacy and interprofessional training and education suitable for those roles. This needs to remain the key priority of the profession.</p><p>Structured, formalised, and recognised training programs for pharmacy technicians or assistants need to be developed to enable further expanded pharmacy technician and assistant roles to support clinical pharmacy services. Unfortunately, the training and recognition pathways in Australia for pharmacy technicians currently do not support a clinical scope of practice for pharmacy technician and assistant roles unlike those in place internationally, and until these are in place these roles remain aspirational. However, this in no way diminishes the wonderful contributions made by pharmacy technicians and assistants in clinical support roles. This provides the challenge for the future, a focus on robust evidence based educational programs that demonstrate competency, accountability, and formal recognition of those aspirational roles.</p><p>One of the other major changes to this version of the professional standards is the highlighting that interprofessional collaboration is essential to the delivery of efficient and effective person-centred care and that pharmacists need to be present at the point of decision-making to contribute to medicines-related decisions. This includes having clinical pharmacy services align with clinical units, including both inpatient and ambulatory settings, and developing strong interprofessional relationships and teams. Tom Simpson's comments also reflect this through the professional organisations championing of innovative models of care can maximise patient outcomes.<span><sup>5</sup></span> The incorporation of collaborative prescribing models within these Standards is a clear example of such collaboration.</p><p>I hope, our profession, with the support and collaboration of others, will endeavour to bring these Standards to life, to continue to improve the care provided to the communities we support and guide person-centred pharmacy services.</p><p>Michael J. Dooley is Editor-in-Chief of the <i>Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research</i>, author of Advanced Pharmacy Australia Clinical Pharmacy Standards and Director of the Victorian Voluntary Assisted Dying Service.</p><p><b>Michael J Dooley:</b> conceptualisation, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing.</p><p>Ethics approval was not required for this editorial as it did not contain any human data or participants.</p><p>Not Commissioned, not externally peer reviewed.</p><p>This editorial received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.</p>","PeriodicalId":16795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","volume":"54 6","pages":"439-440"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jppr.1968","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical pharmacy services supporting patient care\",\"authors\":\"Michael J. Dooley BPharm, GradDipHospPharm, PhD, FSHP\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jppr.1968\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In this issue of the <i>Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research</i> we have new Clinical Pharmacy Standards for the profession.<span><sup>1</sup></span> It has been a pleasure to work alongside so many others to help bring this important consensus document together and to have been involved in the earlier versions. The first comprehensive standard of practice for clinical pharmacy was published by the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia in 1996 with updated versions subsequently released in 2005 and 2015.<span><sup>2-4</sup></span></p><p>As practice has evolved over time the new <i>Advanced Pharmacy Australia Clinical Pharmacy Standards</i><span><sup>1</sup></span> have been adapted to incorporate a greater focus on describing the key quality elements for practice as well as focus on person centred care and interdisciplinary practice whilst proving guidance on prioritisation of the clinical pharmacy services.</p><p>The accompanying editorial authored by Advanced Pharmacy Australia President Tom Simpson shares his views on the importance of this work and described the Standards as a blueprint for patient care and an ‘instruction manual’ for how to design, implement, and measure the clinical pharmacy services that underpin contemporary medicines management.<span><sup>5</sup></span> Dr Danielle McMullen, the President of the Australian Medical Association, describes the importance of collaboration between professions and the vision to implement innovative models of care safely, to improve patient outcomes and the experience as practitioner.<span><sup>6</sup></span> This perspective from our medical colleagues is vital as it reinforces one of the key principles in our Standards; that interprofessional collaboration is essential to the delivery of efficient and effective person-centred care.</p><p>These Standards provide a framework and guidance for comprehensive and accountable clinical pharmacy services. The underpinning principle is to describe current best practice to support the basic rights of patients when accessing healthcare services, including access, safety, respect, partnership, information, privacy, and the right to give feedback. Comprehensive and accountable clinical pharmacy services are an essential component of contemporary health care. The challenge has been to describe the quality of practice for clinical pharmacy services in Australia, irrespective of service type (private and public hospitals, inpatients, outpatients or community-based services) or location (metropolitan, regional, rural, or remote).</p><p>A fundamental component of these Standards has been to provide clear guidance for the pharmacy workforce, which encompasses pharmacists, but also includes pharmacy technicians and assistants who play a pivotal role in the care provided. The scope of practice and role delineation between the professional scope of practice of pharmacists and that of pharmacy technicians and assistants required significant consideration. The basis of this was the underpinning principle that the scope of clinical practice is defined as the professional activities that a pharmacist is educated in (skills/knowledge), competent and authorised to perform, and for which they are accountable. Consequently, the scope of clinical practice when referred to in these Standards, relates to the clinical practice provided by pharmacists exercising their professional judgement.</p><p>As with all healthcare professions, pharmacists must be supported to practice at their full scope. Activities that do not require professional judgement can be undertaken by any member of the pharmacy workforce who has received the appropriate evidence-informed pharmacy and interprofessional training and education suitable for those roles. This needs to remain the key priority of the profession.</p><p>Structured, formalised, and recognised training programs for pharmacy technicians or assistants need to be developed to enable further expanded pharmacy technician and assistant roles to support clinical pharmacy services. Unfortunately, the training and recognition pathways in Australia for pharmacy technicians currently do not support a clinical scope of practice for pharmacy technician and assistant roles unlike those in place internationally, and until these are in place these roles remain aspirational. However, this in no way diminishes the wonderful contributions made by pharmacy technicians and assistants in clinical support roles. This provides the challenge for the future, a focus on robust evidence based educational programs that demonstrate competency, accountability, and formal recognition of those aspirational roles.</p><p>One of the other major changes to this version of the professional standards is the highlighting that interprofessional collaboration is essential to the delivery of efficient and effective person-centred care and that pharmacists need to be present at the point of decision-making to contribute to medicines-related decisions. This includes having clinical pharmacy services align with clinical units, including both inpatient and ambulatory settings, and developing strong interprofessional relationships and teams. Tom Simpson's comments also reflect this through the professional organisations championing of innovative models of care can maximise patient outcomes.<span><sup>5</sup></span> The incorporation of collaborative prescribing models within these Standards is a clear example of such collaboration.</p><p>I hope, our profession, with the support and collaboration of others, will endeavour to bring these Standards to life, to continue to improve the care provided to the communities we support and guide person-centred pharmacy services.</p><p>Michael J. Dooley is Editor-in-Chief of the <i>Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research</i>, author of Advanced Pharmacy Australia Clinical Pharmacy Standards and Director of the Victorian Voluntary Assisted Dying Service.</p><p><b>Michael J Dooley:</b> conceptualisation, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing.</p><p>Ethics approval was not required for this editorial as it did not contain any human data or participants.</p><p>Not Commissioned, not externally peer reviewed.</p><p>This editorial received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research\",\"volume\":\"54 6\",\"pages\":\"439-440\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jppr.1968\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jppr.1968\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jppr.1968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这一期的《药学实践与研究》杂志上,我们有新的临床药学专业标准我很高兴能与这么多人一起努力,帮助完成这份重要的协商一致文件,并参与了早期的版本。第一个临床药学综合实践标准由澳大利亚医院药剂师协会于1996年出版,随后于2005年和2015年发布了更新版本。随着实践的不断发展,新的《澳大利亚高级药学临床药学标准1》进行了调整,更加注重描述实践的关键质量要素,同时注重以人为本的护理和跨学科的实践,同时提供指导论临床药学服务的优先排序。澳大利亚高级药房主席Tom Simpson撰写的社论分享了他对这项工作的重要性的看法,并将该标准描述为患者护理的蓝图和如何设计、实施和衡量支撑当代药物管理的临床药学服务的“指导手册”澳大利亚医学协会主席Danielle McMullen博士描述了专业之间合作的重要性,以及实施创新的安全护理模式的愿景,以改善患者的治疗结果和作为医生的经验来自我们医疗同事的这一观点至关重要,因为它强化了我们标准中的一个关键原则;这种跨专业合作对于提供高效和有效的以人为本的护理至关重要。这些标准为全面和负责任的临床药学服务提供了框架和指导。基本原则是描述当前的最佳做法,以支持患者在获得医疗保健服务时的基本权利,包括获取、安全、尊重、伙伴关系、信息、隐私和反馈权。全面和负责任的临床药学服务是当代卫生保健的重要组成部分。挑战在于描述澳大利亚临床药学服务的实践质量,而不考虑服务类型(私立和公立医院、住院病人、门诊病人或社区服务)或地点(大都市、地区、农村或偏远地区)。这些标准的一个基本组成部分是为药学工作人员提供明确的指导,其中包括药剂师,但也包括在所提供的护理中发挥关键作用的药学技术人员和助理。药剂师与药学技术人员和助理的专业执业范围和角色划分需要认真考虑。其基础是基本原则,即临床实践的范围被定义为药剂师接受(技能/知识)教育,有能力和授权执行并对其负责的专业活动。因此,本标准中所提及的临床实践范围涉及药师行使其专业判断所提供的临床实践。与所有的医疗保健专业,药剂师必须支持实践在他们的全部范围。不需要专业判断的活动可以由任何接受过适当的循证药学和适合这些角色的跨专业培训和教育的药学工作人员承担。这需要继续成为该行业的关键优先事项。需要制定结构化、正规化和认可的药学技术人员或助理培训计划,以进一步扩大药学技术人员和助理的角色,以支持临床药学服务。不幸的是,目前澳大利亚对药学技术人员的培训和认可途径不像国际上那样支持药学技术人员和助理角色的临床实践范围,直到这些角色到位,这些角色仍然是有抱负的。然而,这并没有减少药房技术人员和助理在临床支持角色的奇妙贡献。这为未来提供了挑战,重点放在基于证据的强有力的教育项目上,这些项目展示了能力、责任和对这些理想角色的正式认可。该版本专业标准的另一个主要变化是强调跨专业合作对于提供高效和有效的以人为本的护理至关重要,药剂师需要在决策时在场,以促进与药物有关的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical pharmacy services supporting patient care

In this issue of the Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research we have new Clinical Pharmacy Standards for the profession.1 It has been a pleasure to work alongside so many others to help bring this important consensus document together and to have been involved in the earlier versions. The first comprehensive standard of practice for clinical pharmacy was published by the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia in 1996 with updated versions subsequently released in 2005 and 2015.2-4

As practice has evolved over time the new Advanced Pharmacy Australia Clinical Pharmacy Standards1 have been adapted to incorporate a greater focus on describing the key quality elements for practice as well as focus on person centred care and interdisciplinary practice whilst proving guidance on prioritisation of the clinical pharmacy services.

The accompanying editorial authored by Advanced Pharmacy Australia President Tom Simpson shares his views on the importance of this work and described the Standards as a blueprint for patient care and an ‘instruction manual’ for how to design, implement, and measure the clinical pharmacy services that underpin contemporary medicines management.5 Dr Danielle McMullen, the President of the Australian Medical Association, describes the importance of collaboration between professions and the vision to implement innovative models of care safely, to improve patient outcomes and the experience as practitioner.6 This perspective from our medical colleagues is vital as it reinforces one of the key principles in our Standards; that interprofessional collaboration is essential to the delivery of efficient and effective person-centred care.

These Standards provide a framework and guidance for comprehensive and accountable clinical pharmacy services. The underpinning principle is to describe current best practice to support the basic rights of patients when accessing healthcare services, including access, safety, respect, partnership, information, privacy, and the right to give feedback. Comprehensive and accountable clinical pharmacy services are an essential component of contemporary health care. The challenge has been to describe the quality of practice for clinical pharmacy services in Australia, irrespective of service type (private and public hospitals, inpatients, outpatients or community-based services) or location (metropolitan, regional, rural, or remote).

A fundamental component of these Standards has been to provide clear guidance for the pharmacy workforce, which encompasses pharmacists, but also includes pharmacy technicians and assistants who play a pivotal role in the care provided. The scope of practice and role delineation between the professional scope of practice of pharmacists and that of pharmacy technicians and assistants required significant consideration. The basis of this was the underpinning principle that the scope of clinical practice is defined as the professional activities that a pharmacist is educated in (skills/knowledge), competent and authorised to perform, and for which they are accountable. Consequently, the scope of clinical practice when referred to in these Standards, relates to the clinical practice provided by pharmacists exercising their professional judgement.

As with all healthcare professions, pharmacists must be supported to practice at their full scope. Activities that do not require professional judgement can be undertaken by any member of the pharmacy workforce who has received the appropriate evidence-informed pharmacy and interprofessional training and education suitable for those roles. This needs to remain the key priority of the profession.

Structured, formalised, and recognised training programs for pharmacy technicians or assistants need to be developed to enable further expanded pharmacy technician and assistant roles to support clinical pharmacy services. Unfortunately, the training and recognition pathways in Australia for pharmacy technicians currently do not support a clinical scope of practice for pharmacy technician and assistant roles unlike those in place internationally, and until these are in place these roles remain aspirational. However, this in no way diminishes the wonderful contributions made by pharmacy technicians and assistants in clinical support roles. This provides the challenge for the future, a focus on robust evidence based educational programs that demonstrate competency, accountability, and formal recognition of those aspirational roles.

One of the other major changes to this version of the professional standards is the highlighting that interprofessional collaboration is essential to the delivery of efficient and effective person-centred care and that pharmacists need to be present at the point of decision-making to contribute to medicines-related decisions. This includes having clinical pharmacy services align with clinical units, including both inpatient and ambulatory settings, and developing strong interprofessional relationships and teams. Tom Simpson's comments also reflect this through the professional organisations championing of innovative models of care can maximise patient outcomes.5 The incorporation of collaborative prescribing models within these Standards is a clear example of such collaboration.

I hope, our profession, with the support and collaboration of others, will endeavour to bring these Standards to life, to continue to improve the care provided to the communities we support and guide person-centred pharmacy services.

Michael J. Dooley is Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research, author of Advanced Pharmacy Australia Clinical Pharmacy Standards and Director of the Victorian Voluntary Assisted Dying Service.

Michael J Dooley: conceptualisation, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing.

Ethics approval was not required for this editorial as it did not contain any human data or participants.

Not Commissioned, not externally peer reviewed.

This editorial received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
9.50%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The purpose of this document is to describe the structure, function and operations of the Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research, the official journal of the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia (SHPA). It is owned, published by and copyrighted to SHPA. However, the Journal is to some extent unique within SHPA in that it ‘…has complete editorial freedom in terms of content and is not under the direction of the Society or its Council in such matters…’. This statement, originally based on a Role Statement for the Editor-in-Chief 1993, is also based on the definition of ‘editorial independence’ from the World Association of Medical Editors and adopted by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信