纠缠:论田野调查的社会伦理摩擦

KATE SIECK PhD
{"title":"纠缠:论田野调查的社会伦理摩擦","authors":"KATE SIECK PhD","doi":"10.1111/epic.12187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>This paper asks what we owe to our teams and our informants when we engage in research with and about people. Participant-observation – the defining methodology of ethnographic praxis – has long had trade-offs resulting from the many frictions inherent in it, all of which are essential to producing the unique insights and findings of this approach As practitioners, we've often turned a blind eye to these, suggesting the significance of our work outweighs the consequences. But is that always true? This paper offers an equation of sorts for articulating and assessing the underlying forces creating friction in ethnographic research. While it does not posit an all-encompassing metric, it provides a way for researchers to be more cognizant about and deliberate with the ways we use friction in our projects.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":89347,"journal":{"name":"Conference proceedings. Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference","volume":"2023 1","pages":"544-558"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/epic.12187","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Entangled: On the Social and Ethical Friction of Fieldwork\",\"authors\":\"KATE SIECK PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/epic.12187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p>This paper asks what we owe to our teams and our informants when we engage in research with and about people. Participant-observation – the defining methodology of ethnographic praxis – has long had trade-offs resulting from the many frictions inherent in it, all of which are essential to producing the unique insights and findings of this approach As practitioners, we've often turned a blind eye to these, suggesting the significance of our work outweighs the consequences. But is that always true? This paper offers an equation of sorts for articulating and assessing the underlying forces creating friction in ethnographic research. While it does not posit an all-encompassing metric, it provides a way for researchers to be more cognizant about and deliberate with the ways we use friction in our projects.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conference proceedings. Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference\",\"volume\":\"2023 1\",\"pages\":\"544-558\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/epic.12187\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conference proceedings. Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/epic.12187\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conference proceedings. Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/epic.12187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇论文问,当我们从事与人有关的研究时,我们欠我们的团队和我们的线人什么。参与式观察——人种学实践的定义方法——长期以来由于其固有的许多摩擦而产生了权衡,所有这些都是产生这种方法的独特见解和发现的必要条件。作为实践者,我们经常对这些视而不见,这表明我们工作的意义超过了后果。但这总是正确的吗?本文提供了各种各样的方程式,用于阐明和评估在民族志研究中产生摩擦的潜在力量。虽然它没有假设一个包罗万象的度量标准,但它为研究人员提供了一种方法,使他们能够更加认识和深思熟虑我们在项目中使用摩擦的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Entangled: On the Social and Ethical Friction of Fieldwork

This paper asks what we owe to our teams and our informants when we engage in research with and about people. Participant-observation – the defining methodology of ethnographic praxis – has long had trade-offs resulting from the many frictions inherent in it, all of which are essential to producing the unique insights and findings of this approach As practitioners, we've often turned a blind eye to these, suggesting the significance of our work outweighs the consequences. But is that always true? This paper offers an equation of sorts for articulating and assessing the underlying forces creating friction in ethnographic research. While it does not posit an all-encompassing metric, it provides a way for researchers to be more cognizant about and deliberate with the ways we use friction in our projects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信