来自i .家庭研究的欧洲儿童、青少年和成人健康和不健康植物性饮食倾向评分的发展和验证

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Guiomar Masip, Jantje Goerdten, Tooba Asif, Antje Hebestreit, Monica Hunsberger, Lauren Lissner, Denes Molnar, Valeria Pala, Paola Russo, Michael Tornaritis, Toomas Veidebaum, Maike Wolters, Luis A. Moreno, Leonie H. Bogl
{"title":"来自i .家庭研究的欧洲儿童、青少年和成人健康和不健康植物性饮食倾向评分的发展和验证","authors":"Guiomar Masip,&nbsp;Jantje Goerdten,&nbsp;Tooba Asif,&nbsp;Antje Hebestreit,&nbsp;Monica Hunsberger,&nbsp;Lauren Lissner,&nbsp;Denes Molnar,&nbsp;Valeria Pala,&nbsp;Paola Russo,&nbsp;Michael Tornaritis,&nbsp;Toomas Veidebaum,&nbsp;Maike Wolters,&nbsp;Luis A. Moreno,&nbsp;Leonie H. Bogl","doi":"10.1111/jhn.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Plant-based dietary patterns may reduce the risk of chronic diseases, but their benefits and risks in younger populations remain unclear due to variations in diet quality and nutrient adequacy. Robust tools to assess adherence to these patterns are essential. The aim of this study was to develop and validate three plant-based diet propensity (PBDP) scores – overall, healthy and unhealthy – to capture plant-based dietary patterns and assess their associations with nutrient intakes and health indicators in children, adolescents and adults.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This cross-sectional study of children, adolescents and adults used data from the I.Family study (<i>n</i> = 15,780 participants) from eight European countries. Dietary intake was assessed using a food frequency questionnaire. The overall PBDP score was constructed by categorising all plant-based food groups as positive and animal-based food groups as negative. The healthy PBDP emphasised healthy plant-based food groups, whereas the unhealthy PBDP emphasised less healthy plant-based food groups. Validity was assessed through correlations with nutrient intakes and comparison across demographic groups. Associations with health indicators were also analysed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>PBDP scores showed expected associations with nutrient intakes. Higher overall and healthy PBDP scores were observed in females, adults, individuals with higher parental educational levels and those from Belgium and Spain. The healthy PBDP score was associated with higher HDL cholesterol, improved bone stiffness and lower triglycerides. The unhealthy PBDP score was associated with lower HDL cholesterol in adults, but not in children or adolescents.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>PBDP scores describe plant-based dietary patterns across demographic groups and are valid and reliable in adults. The findings highlight challenges in assessing dietary patterns in children and adolescents. Future research should address these challenges to enhance the validity of PBDP scores in younger populations and further explore their potential in guiding dietary recommendations across all age groups.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validation of Healthy and Unhealthy Plant-Based Diet Propensity Scores in European Children, Adolescents and Adults From the I.Family Study\",\"authors\":\"Guiomar Masip,&nbsp;Jantje Goerdten,&nbsp;Tooba Asif,&nbsp;Antje Hebestreit,&nbsp;Monica Hunsberger,&nbsp;Lauren Lissner,&nbsp;Denes Molnar,&nbsp;Valeria Pala,&nbsp;Paola Russo,&nbsp;Michael Tornaritis,&nbsp;Toomas Veidebaum,&nbsp;Maike Wolters,&nbsp;Luis A. Moreno,&nbsp;Leonie H. Bogl\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jhn.70021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Plant-based dietary patterns may reduce the risk of chronic diseases, but their benefits and risks in younger populations remain unclear due to variations in diet quality and nutrient adequacy. Robust tools to assess adherence to these patterns are essential. The aim of this study was to develop and validate three plant-based diet propensity (PBDP) scores – overall, healthy and unhealthy – to capture plant-based dietary patterns and assess their associations with nutrient intakes and health indicators in children, adolescents and adults.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This cross-sectional study of children, adolescents and adults used data from the I.Family study (<i>n</i> = 15,780 participants) from eight European countries. Dietary intake was assessed using a food frequency questionnaire. The overall PBDP score was constructed by categorising all plant-based food groups as positive and animal-based food groups as negative. The healthy PBDP emphasised healthy plant-based food groups, whereas the unhealthy PBDP emphasised less healthy plant-based food groups. Validity was assessed through correlations with nutrient intakes and comparison across demographic groups. Associations with health indicators were also analysed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>PBDP scores showed expected associations with nutrient intakes. Higher overall and healthy PBDP scores were observed in females, adults, individuals with higher parental educational levels and those from Belgium and Spain. The healthy PBDP score was associated with higher HDL cholesterol, improved bone stiffness and lower triglycerides. The unhealthy PBDP score was associated with lower HDL cholesterol in adults, but not in children or adolescents.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>PBDP scores describe plant-based dietary patterns across demographic groups and are valid and reliable in adults. The findings highlight challenges in assessing dietary patterns in children and adolescents. Future research should address these challenges to enhance the validity of PBDP scores in younger populations and further explore their potential in guiding dietary recommendations across all age groups.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jhn.70021\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jhn.70021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

植物性饮食模式可能降低慢性疾病的风险,但由于饮食质量和营养充足性的差异,其在年轻人群中的益处和风险尚不清楚。评估遵守这些模式的健壮工具是必不可少的。本研究的目的是开发和验证三种植物性饮食倾向(PBDP)评分——总体、健康和不健康——以捕捉植物性饮食模式,并评估它们与儿童、青少年和成人的营养摄入和健康指标的关系。方法本横断面研究采用来自8个欧洲国家的i .家庭研究(n = 15,780名参与者)的数据,研究对象包括儿童、青少年和成人。使用食物频率问卷评估饮食摄入量。总体PBDP评分是通过将所有植物性食物组分类为阳性,动物性食物组分类为阴性来构建的。健康的PBDP强调健康的植物性食物组,而不健康的PBDP强调不健康的植物性食物组。通过与营养摄入量的相关性和人口统计学组间的比较来评估有效性。还分析了与健康指标的关系。结果PBDP评分与营养摄入有预期的相关性。在女性、成年人、父母受教育程度较高的个体以及来自比利时和西班牙的个体中观察到更高的总体和健康PBDP得分。健康的PBDP评分与较高的高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、改善的骨硬度和较低的甘油三酯有关。在成人中,不健康的PBDP评分与较低的高密度脂蛋白胆固醇有关,但在儿童或青少年中没有。结论PBDP评分描述了不同人群的植物性饮食模式,在成人中是有效和可靠的。研究结果强调了评估儿童和青少年饮食模式的挑战。未来的研究应解决这些挑战,以提高PBDP评分在年轻人群中的有效性,并进一步探索其在指导所有年龄组饮食建议方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and Validation of Healthy and Unhealthy Plant-Based Diet Propensity Scores in European Children, Adolescents and Adults From the I.Family Study

Introduction

Plant-based dietary patterns may reduce the risk of chronic diseases, but their benefits and risks in younger populations remain unclear due to variations in diet quality and nutrient adequacy. Robust tools to assess adherence to these patterns are essential. The aim of this study was to develop and validate three plant-based diet propensity (PBDP) scores – overall, healthy and unhealthy – to capture plant-based dietary patterns and assess their associations with nutrient intakes and health indicators in children, adolescents and adults.

Methods

This cross-sectional study of children, adolescents and adults used data from the I.Family study (n = 15,780 participants) from eight European countries. Dietary intake was assessed using a food frequency questionnaire. The overall PBDP score was constructed by categorising all plant-based food groups as positive and animal-based food groups as negative. The healthy PBDP emphasised healthy plant-based food groups, whereas the unhealthy PBDP emphasised less healthy plant-based food groups. Validity was assessed through correlations with nutrient intakes and comparison across demographic groups. Associations with health indicators were also analysed.

Results

PBDP scores showed expected associations with nutrient intakes. Higher overall and healthy PBDP scores were observed in females, adults, individuals with higher parental educational levels and those from Belgium and Spain. The healthy PBDP score was associated with higher HDL cholesterol, improved bone stiffness and lower triglycerides. The unhealthy PBDP score was associated with lower HDL cholesterol in adults, but not in children or adolescents.

Conclusion

PBDP scores describe plant-based dietary patterns across demographic groups and are valid and reliable in adults. The findings highlight challenges in assessing dietary patterns in children and adolescents. Future research should address these challenges to enhance the validity of PBDP scores in younger populations and further explore their potential in guiding dietary recommendations across all age groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
133
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing papers in applied nutrition and dietetics. Papers are therefore welcomed on: - Clinical nutrition and the practice of therapeutic dietetics - Clinical and professional guidelines - Public health nutrition and nutritional epidemiology - Dietary surveys and dietary assessment methodology - Health promotion and intervention studies and their effectiveness - Obesity, weight control and body composition - Research on psychological determinants of healthy and unhealthy eating behaviour. Focus can for example be on attitudes, brain correlates of food reward processing, social influences, impulsivity, cognitive control, cognitive processes, dieting, psychological treatments. - Appetite, Food intake and nutritional status - Nutrigenomics and molecular nutrition - The journal does not publish animal research The journal is published in an online-only format. No printed issue of this title will be produced but authors will still be able to order offprints of their own articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信