澳大利亚多群体弱势群体的公共叙事:研究地图与实践反思

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES
Peter Bragge, Simon D. Angus, Alex Fischer, Alyse Lennox, Alex R. Piquero, Tim Reddel, Liam Smith, Lucas Walsh, Rebecca Wickes, Abby Wild, Nicholas Faulkner
{"title":"澳大利亚多群体弱势群体的公共叙事:研究地图与实践反思","authors":"Peter Bragge,&nbsp;Simon D. Angus,&nbsp;Alex Fischer,&nbsp;Alyse Lennox,&nbsp;Alex R. Piquero,&nbsp;Tim Reddel,&nbsp;Liam Smith,&nbsp;Lucas Walsh,&nbsp;Rebecca Wickes,&nbsp;Abby Wild,&nbsp;Nicholas Faulkner","doi":"10.1002/ajs4.322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper provides the first known “heatmap” representing Australian public narratives across a range of groups experiencing disadvantage developed from a comprehensive literature review of primary Australian studies between 2020 and 2021. Eleven narratives were identified across 14 population groups with the most frequent being <i>deficit narratives</i>, <i>misrepresentation of the issue</i> and <i>‘absent’ narratives</i> (group being described not represented in the narrative). The most frequently described groups were Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, people living with a disability, racial minorities and women. The heatmap resonated with three global review-level studies and findings of supplementary qualitative interviews. Examination of relationships between the heatmap and empirical Australian disadvantage data enabled identification of missing and misleading public narratives. Attempts to disrupt such narratives can improve the understanding of disadvantage by more truthfully reflecting the lives, experiences and challenges of groups experiencing disadvantage. Updates to the heatmap can enable analysis of the impact of disruption strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":46787,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","volume":"59 4","pages":"979-994"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajs4.322","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public narratives of disadvantage across multiple groups in Australia: A research map and practice reflections\",\"authors\":\"Peter Bragge,&nbsp;Simon D. Angus,&nbsp;Alex Fischer,&nbsp;Alyse Lennox,&nbsp;Alex R. Piquero,&nbsp;Tim Reddel,&nbsp;Liam Smith,&nbsp;Lucas Walsh,&nbsp;Rebecca Wickes,&nbsp;Abby Wild,&nbsp;Nicholas Faulkner\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ajs4.322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper provides the first known “heatmap” representing Australian public narratives across a range of groups experiencing disadvantage developed from a comprehensive literature review of primary Australian studies between 2020 and 2021. Eleven narratives were identified across 14 population groups with the most frequent being <i>deficit narratives</i>, <i>misrepresentation of the issue</i> and <i>‘absent’ narratives</i> (group being described not represented in the narrative). The most frequently described groups were Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, people living with a disability, racial minorities and women. The heatmap resonated with three global review-level studies and findings of supplementary qualitative interviews. Examination of relationships between the heatmap and empirical Australian disadvantage data enabled identification of missing and misleading public narratives. Attempts to disrupt such narratives can improve the understanding of disadvantage by more truthfully reflecting the lives, experiences and challenges of groups experiencing disadvantage. Updates to the heatmap can enable analysis of the impact of disruption strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46787,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Social Issues\",\"volume\":\"59 4\",\"pages\":\"979-994\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajs4.322\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Social Issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajs4.322\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajs4.322","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提供了第一个已知的“热图”,代表了澳大利亚在2020年至2021年期间对澳大利亚主要研究的综合文献综述中发展起来的一系列弱势群体的澳大利亚公共叙事。在14个人群中发现了11种叙述,其中最常见的是赤字叙述、对问题的歪曲和“缺席”叙述(叙述中没有被描述的群体)。最常被提及的群体是土著人和托雷斯海峡岛民、残疾人、少数民族和妇女。该热图与三项全球评论级研究和补充定性访谈的结果产生了共鸣。检查热图和经验澳大利亚劣势数据之间的关系,可以识别缺失和误导性的公共叙述。打破这种叙事的尝试可以通过更真实地反映弱势群体的生活、经历和挑战,提高对弱势群体的理解。更新热图可以分析中断策略的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Public narratives of disadvantage across multiple groups in Australia: A research map and practice reflections

Public narratives of disadvantage across multiple groups in Australia: A research map and practice reflections

This paper provides the first known “heatmap” representing Australian public narratives across a range of groups experiencing disadvantage developed from a comprehensive literature review of primary Australian studies between 2020 and 2021. Eleven narratives were identified across 14 population groups with the most frequent being deficit narratives, misrepresentation of the issue and ‘absent’ narratives (group being described not represented in the narrative). The most frequently described groups were Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, people living with a disability, racial minorities and women. The heatmap resonated with three global review-level studies and findings of supplementary qualitative interviews. Examination of relationships between the heatmap and empirical Australian disadvantage data enabled identification of missing and misleading public narratives. Attempts to disrupt such narratives can improve the understanding of disadvantage by more truthfully reflecting the lives, experiences and challenges of groups experiencing disadvantage. Updates to the heatmap can enable analysis of the impact of disruption strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信