司法领域的其他法律知识之争:墨西哥格雷罗的土著领土本体论和采矿开采主义

IF 0.6 2区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Yacotzin Bravo Espinosa, María Teresa Sierra Camacho
{"title":"司法领域的其他法律知识之争:墨西哥格雷罗的土著领土本体论和采矿开采主义","authors":"Yacotzin Bravo Espinosa,&nbsp;María Teresa Sierra Camacho","doi":"10.1111/jlca.12746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The <i>Mè’phàà</i> people in Guerrero, Mexico, won a judgment against open-pit mining by which they asserted their sacred and integral conceptions of territory as part of their collective rights. Through the sentence, they avoided the dispossession of their lands and life project. This article analyzes how discourses around indigenous territorial ontologies were brought into play through anthropological expert reports. We are interested in highlighting the challenges and limits of judicial knowledge when disputing different rationalities and epistemologies regarding territory, grievances, and rights within the legal space. We document the production of non-Western legal knowledge in the judicial field, revealing indigenous territory visions that confront the extractive projects. We focus our ethnographic gaze on the cultural and legal translation of the knowledge of the <i>Mè’phàà</i> people to analyze the scope and limits of a dialogue of knowledges and its effects on the judicialization and the politicization of the indigenous struggle.</p>","PeriodicalId":45512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology","volume":"29 4","pages":"339-351"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The dispute for other legal knowledges in the judicial field: Indigenous territorial ontologies and mining extractivism in Guerrero, Mexico\",\"authors\":\"Yacotzin Bravo Espinosa,&nbsp;María Teresa Sierra Camacho\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jlca.12746\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The <i>Mè’phàà</i> people in Guerrero, Mexico, won a judgment against open-pit mining by which they asserted their sacred and integral conceptions of territory as part of their collective rights. Through the sentence, they avoided the dispossession of their lands and life project. This article analyzes how discourses around indigenous territorial ontologies were brought into play through anthropological expert reports. We are interested in highlighting the challenges and limits of judicial knowledge when disputing different rationalities and epistemologies regarding territory, grievances, and rights within the legal space. We document the production of non-Western legal knowledge in the judicial field, revealing indigenous territory visions that confront the extractive projects. We focus our ethnographic gaze on the cultural and legal translation of the knowledge of the <i>Mè’phàà</i> people to analyze the scope and limits of a dialogue of knowledges and its effects on the judicialization and the politicization of the indigenous struggle.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology\",\"volume\":\"29 4\",\"pages\":\"339-351\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jlca.12746\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jlca.12746","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

墨西哥Guerrero的Mè ' phàà人民赢得了反对露天采矿的判决,通过该判决,他们主张其神圣和完整的领土概念是其集体权利的一部分。通过判决,他们避免了土地和生活项目被剥夺。本文通过人类学专家报告分析了土著领土本体的话语是如何发挥作用的。我们有兴趣强调司法知识的挑战和局限性,当争论不同的理性和认识论关于领土,冤屈和法律空间内的权利。我们记录了非西方法律知识在司法领域的产生,揭示了面对采掘项目的土著领土愿景。我们将民族志的目光集中在Mè ' phàà人民知识的文化和法律翻译上,以分析知识对话的范围和限制,以及它对土著斗争的司法化和政治化的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The dispute for other legal knowledges in the judicial field: Indigenous territorial ontologies and mining extractivism in Guerrero, Mexico

The Mè’phàà people in Guerrero, Mexico, won a judgment against open-pit mining by which they asserted their sacred and integral conceptions of territory as part of their collective rights. Through the sentence, they avoided the dispossession of their lands and life project. This article analyzes how discourses around indigenous territorial ontologies were brought into play through anthropological expert reports. We are interested in highlighting the challenges and limits of judicial knowledge when disputing different rationalities and epistemologies regarding territory, grievances, and rights within the legal space. We document the production of non-Western legal knowledge in the judicial field, revealing indigenous territory visions that confront the extractive projects. We focus our ethnographic gaze on the cultural and legal translation of the knowledge of the Mè’phàà people to analyze the scope and limits of a dialogue of knowledges and its effects on the judicialization and the politicization of the indigenous struggle.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
61
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信