用Rang方法治疗儿童移位的中骨干桡骨/尺骨骨折的疗效:一项初步研究

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Joshua Chen, Sarah Peiffer, Sam Dressler, William Hennrikus
{"title":"用Rang方法治疗儿童移位的中骨干桡骨/尺骨骨折的疗效:一项初步研究","authors":"Joshua Chen, Sarah Peiffer, Sam Dressler, William Hennrikus","doi":"10.1097/BPB.0000000000001239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pediatric forearm fractures of the radius and ulna are common. Previous literature suggests that conservatively managed mid-shaft radius and ulna forearm fractures have a remanipulation rate of 10-70%. The purpose of this study is to compare the re-displacement rate of closed displaced mid-shaft both-bone forearm fractures (BBFF) in children treated with closed reduction and casting with a loop and sling applied proximal to the fracture site (Rang method) compared with a standard sling. A retrospective review was performed of 42 patients under the age of 14 with BBFF treated over a 4-year period. The average patient age was 7 years. Data analyzed included demographics, mechanism of injury, presence of a pulse, presence of nerve injury, incidence of compartment syndrome, sling type, loss of reduction, remanipulation, and need for surgical fixation. Loss of reduction was defined as a final number of >15° angulation if age <10 years old and >10° angulation if >10 years old. Fifteen patients (36%) were treated with the Rang method. Twenty-seven patients (64%) were given a standard sling. Only one patient (7%) managed with the Rang method lost reduction, whereas 17/27 patients (63%) given a regular sling lost reduction and required remanipulation (P = 0.0004). Treatment of a BBFF in a child aged <14 years typically involves closed reduction and casting. The 'Rang' method of placing a loop and attached sling proximal to the fracture site is a casting pearl that helps to minimize fracture redisplacement.</p>","PeriodicalId":50092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of displaced mid-shaft radius/ulna fractures in children treated with the Rang method: a pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Joshua Chen, Sarah Peiffer, Sam Dressler, William Hennrikus\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BPB.0000000000001239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pediatric forearm fractures of the radius and ulna are common. Previous literature suggests that conservatively managed mid-shaft radius and ulna forearm fractures have a remanipulation rate of 10-70%. The purpose of this study is to compare the re-displacement rate of closed displaced mid-shaft both-bone forearm fractures (BBFF) in children treated with closed reduction and casting with a loop and sling applied proximal to the fracture site (Rang method) compared with a standard sling. A retrospective review was performed of 42 patients under the age of 14 with BBFF treated over a 4-year period. The average patient age was 7 years. Data analyzed included demographics, mechanism of injury, presence of a pulse, presence of nerve injury, incidence of compartment syndrome, sling type, loss of reduction, remanipulation, and need for surgical fixation. Loss of reduction was defined as a final number of >15° angulation if age <10 years old and >10° angulation if >10 years old. Fifteen patients (36%) were treated with the Rang method. Twenty-seven patients (64%) were given a standard sling. Only one patient (7%) managed with the Rang method lost reduction, whereas 17/27 patients (63%) given a regular sling lost reduction and required remanipulation (P = 0.0004). Treatment of a BBFF in a child aged <14 years typically involves closed reduction and casting. The 'Rang' method of placing a loop and attached sling proximal to the fracture site is a casting pearl that helps to minimize fracture redisplacement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000001239\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000001239","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

小儿前臂桡骨和尺骨骨折是常见的。先前的文献表明,保守治疗的前臂中桡骨和尺骨骨折的再操作率为10-70%。本研究的目的是比较儿童封闭移位的中轴双骨前臂骨折(BBFF)在骨折部位近端应用环和吊带进行闭合复位铸造(Rang方法)与标准吊带治疗后的再移位率。对42例14岁以下的BBFF患者进行了为期4年的回顾性研究。患者平均年龄为7岁。分析的数据包括人口统计学、损伤机制、脉搏、神经损伤、筋膜室综合征的发生率、吊带类型、复位丢失、再操作和手术固定的需要。如果年龄为10°,如果>为10°,则>为15°成角的最终数量。采用Rang法治疗15例(36%)。27例(64%)患者使用标准吊带。只有1例患者(7%)采用了Rang方法复位,而17/27例患者(63%)接受了常规吊带复位并需要再操作(P = 0.0004)。老年儿童BBFF的治疗
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of displaced mid-shaft radius/ulna fractures in children treated with the Rang method: a pilot study.

Pediatric forearm fractures of the radius and ulna are common. Previous literature suggests that conservatively managed mid-shaft radius and ulna forearm fractures have a remanipulation rate of 10-70%. The purpose of this study is to compare the re-displacement rate of closed displaced mid-shaft both-bone forearm fractures (BBFF) in children treated with closed reduction and casting with a loop and sling applied proximal to the fracture site (Rang method) compared with a standard sling. A retrospective review was performed of 42 patients under the age of 14 with BBFF treated over a 4-year period. The average patient age was 7 years. Data analyzed included demographics, mechanism of injury, presence of a pulse, presence of nerve injury, incidence of compartment syndrome, sling type, loss of reduction, remanipulation, and need for surgical fixation. Loss of reduction was defined as a final number of >15° angulation if age <10 years old and >10° angulation if >10 years old. Fifteen patients (36%) were treated with the Rang method. Twenty-seven patients (64%) were given a standard sling. Only one patient (7%) managed with the Rang method lost reduction, whereas 17/27 patients (63%) given a regular sling lost reduction and required remanipulation (P = 0.0004). Treatment of a BBFF in a child aged <14 years typically involves closed reduction and casting. The 'Rang' method of placing a loop and attached sling proximal to the fracture site is a casting pearl that helps to minimize fracture redisplacement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
170
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal highlights important recent developments from the world''s leading clinical and research institutions. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers on the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric orthopedic disorders. It is the official journal of IFPOS (International Federation of Paediatric Orthopaedic Societies). Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. ​
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信