Madison K Kilbride, Beth N Peshkin, Jada G Hamilton, Jamie Brower, Hannah Ovadia, Lainie Friedman Ross, Rosalba Sacca, Beth Tarini, Susan M Domchek, Sarah Vittone, Marcelo M Sleiman, Mary Rose Yockel, Caroline Salafia, Claudine Isaacs, Benjamin S Wilfond, Muriel R Statman, Kenneth P Tercyak
{"title":"针对成人遗传性癌症风险的儿科 DTC 基因检测:高风险父母的观点。","authors":"Madison K Kilbride, Beth N Peshkin, Jada G Hamilton, Jamie Brower, Hannah Ovadia, Lainie Friedman Ross, Rosalba Sacca, Beth Tarini, Susan M Domchek, Sarah Vittone, Marcelo M Sleiman, Mary Rose Yockel, Caroline Salafia, Claudine Isaacs, Benjamin S Wilfond, Muriel R Statman, Kenneth P Tercyak","doi":"10.1159/000543913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Despite guidelines discouraging pediatric genetic testing for adult-onset hereditary cancer risk, direct-to-consumer (DTC) companies make them available to children's parents. This study examined the perspectives of high-risk parents towards such testing. Methods Interviews were conducted with N=30 parents (children ages 10-21) carrying pathogenic variants in cancer-causing genes available for detection through DTC tests. Interviews were analyzed inductively using a standardized methodology to identify prominent themes. Results Three major themes were identified: 1) high-risk parents' motivations for pediatric genetic testing, 2) risks and benefits of pediatric genetic testing, and 3) parental involvement of children in decision-making about testing. Although only n=5 parents (17% of the sample) reported that their children were genetically tested (n=3 through a DTC company, n=2 through a clinician), 73% endorsed pediatric genetic testing for general health reasons. Many parents (53%) expressed a preference for clinical testing over DTC testing. While parents recognized the limits of DTC testing, some (40%) expressed that it should remain available to high-risk parents for the purpose of identifying cancer risks in their children. Children's maturity (70%), interest in testing (77%), and anticipated responses to testing (43%) were cited as important decisional considerations. Conclusion Few high-risk parents utilized DTC testing for their children. Parents generally preferred the prospect of clinical testing, but some believed DTC testing should be an option available to families. Clinicians should discuss the risks and benefits of pediatric genetic testing, including DTC, with high-risk parents. This may facilitate more informed decision-making that minimizes potential harms.</p>","PeriodicalId":49650,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Genomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pediatric DTC Genetic Testing for Adult-Onset Inherited Cancer Risk: The Perspectives of High-Risk Parents.\",\"authors\":\"Madison K Kilbride, Beth N Peshkin, Jada G Hamilton, Jamie Brower, Hannah Ovadia, Lainie Friedman Ross, Rosalba Sacca, Beth Tarini, Susan M Domchek, Sarah Vittone, Marcelo M Sleiman, Mary Rose Yockel, Caroline Salafia, Claudine Isaacs, Benjamin S Wilfond, Muriel R Statman, Kenneth P Tercyak\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000543913\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Introduction Despite guidelines discouraging pediatric genetic testing for adult-onset hereditary cancer risk, direct-to-consumer (DTC) companies make them available to children's parents. This study examined the perspectives of high-risk parents towards such testing. Methods Interviews were conducted with N=30 parents (children ages 10-21) carrying pathogenic variants in cancer-causing genes available for detection through DTC tests. Interviews were analyzed inductively using a standardized methodology to identify prominent themes. Results Three major themes were identified: 1) high-risk parents' motivations for pediatric genetic testing, 2) risks and benefits of pediatric genetic testing, and 3) parental involvement of children in decision-making about testing. Although only n=5 parents (17% of the sample) reported that their children were genetically tested (n=3 through a DTC company, n=2 through a clinician), 73% endorsed pediatric genetic testing for general health reasons. Many parents (53%) expressed a preference for clinical testing over DTC testing. While parents recognized the limits of DTC testing, some (40%) expressed that it should remain available to high-risk parents for the purpose of identifying cancer risks in their children. Children's maturity (70%), interest in testing (77%), and anticipated responses to testing (43%) were cited as important decisional considerations. Conclusion Few high-risk parents utilized DTC testing for their children. Parents generally preferred the prospect of clinical testing, but some believed DTC testing should be an option available to families. Clinicians should discuss the risks and benefits of pediatric genetic testing, including DTC, with high-risk parents. This may facilitate more informed decision-making that minimizes potential harms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health Genomics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health Genomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543913\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543913","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pediatric DTC Genetic Testing for Adult-Onset Inherited Cancer Risk: The Perspectives of High-Risk Parents.
Introduction Despite guidelines discouraging pediatric genetic testing for adult-onset hereditary cancer risk, direct-to-consumer (DTC) companies make them available to children's parents. This study examined the perspectives of high-risk parents towards such testing. Methods Interviews were conducted with N=30 parents (children ages 10-21) carrying pathogenic variants in cancer-causing genes available for detection through DTC tests. Interviews were analyzed inductively using a standardized methodology to identify prominent themes. Results Three major themes were identified: 1) high-risk parents' motivations for pediatric genetic testing, 2) risks and benefits of pediatric genetic testing, and 3) parental involvement of children in decision-making about testing. Although only n=5 parents (17% of the sample) reported that their children were genetically tested (n=3 through a DTC company, n=2 through a clinician), 73% endorsed pediatric genetic testing for general health reasons. Many parents (53%) expressed a preference for clinical testing over DTC testing. While parents recognized the limits of DTC testing, some (40%) expressed that it should remain available to high-risk parents for the purpose of identifying cancer risks in their children. Children's maturity (70%), interest in testing (77%), and anticipated responses to testing (43%) were cited as important decisional considerations. Conclusion Few high-risk parents utilized DTC testing for their children. Parents generally preferred the prospect of clinical testing, but some believed DTC testing should be an option available to families. Clinicians should discuss the risks and benefits of pediatric genetic testing, including DTC, with high-risk parents. This may facilitate more informed decision-making that minimizes potential harms.
期刊介绍:
''Public Health Genomics'' is the leading international journal focusing on the timely translation of genome-based knowledge and technologies into public health, health policies, and healthcare as a whole. This peer-reviewed journal is a bimonthly forum featuring original papers, reviews, short communications, and policy statements. It is supplemented by topic-specific issues providing a comprehensive, holistic and ''all-inclusive'' picture of the chosen subject. Multidisciplinary in scope, it combines theoretical and empirical work from a range of disciplines, notably public health, molecular and medical sciences, the humanities and social sciences. In so doing, it also takes into account rapid scientific advances from fields such as systems biology, microbiomics, epigenomics or information and communication technologies as well as the hight potential of ''big data'' for public health.