利益相关者知情的妇科癌症幸存者行为睡眠/昼夜节律干预的改进:MOST准备阶段的应用。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Rina S Fox, Krista Brandon, Terry A Badger, Julia S Gaumond, Ana Acuña Morales, Jason C Ong, Sairam Parthasarathy, Christine Rini, Phyllis C Zee, Edward J Tanner, Sonia Ancoli-Israel, Frank J Penedo, Juned Siddique, Lisa M Wu, Kathryn J Reid, Karen Kaiser
{"title":"利益相关者知情的妇科癌症幸存者行为睡眠/昼夜节律干预的改进:MOST准备阶段的应用。","authors":"Rina S Fox, Krista Brandon, Terry A Badger, Julia S Gaumond, Ana Acuña Morales, Jason C Ong, Sairam Parthasarathy, Christine Rini, Phyllis C Zee, Edward J Tanner, Sonia Ancoli-Israel, Frank J Penedo, Juned Siddique, Lisa M Wu, Kathryn J Reid, Karen Kaiser","doi":"10.1093/tbm/ibaf001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sleep disturbance is among the most frequent and distressing symptoms reported by gynecologic cancer survivors. Existing evidence-based behavioral sleep interventions are limited by implementation burden, which can decrease adherence.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>As part of the preparation phase of the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST), this study solicited stakeholder feedback to maximize adherence in a planned behavioral sleep/circadian intervention optimization trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirteen post-treatment survivors of early-stage gynecologic cancer completed the protocol for the planned optimization trial, including simultaneous receipt of all candidate intervention components. This included six weeks of combined sleep restriction, stimulus control, and systematic exposure to morning bright light. Participants then completed a semi-structured interview to provide feedback on their experience. We used a rapid analytic approach to quickly identify actionable feedback from de-identified transcripts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants generally reacted positively to the intervention components. Actionable feedback identified recommended protocol modifications and was categorized into four overarching themes: (i) remove barriers to engagement; (ii) revise for clarity; (iii) augment content; and (iv) consider individual circumstances.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rapid qualitative analysis enabled us to effectively modify our planned study protocol on an expedited timeline. This approach is consistent with the core principles of MOST and can be incorporated into the Preparation phase to enhance optimization efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":48679,"journal":{"name":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11795304/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stakeholder-informed refinement of a behavioral sleep/circadian intervention for gynecologic cancer survivors: an application of the MOST preparation phase.\",\"authors\":\"Rina S Fox, Krista Brandon, Terry A Badger, Julia S Gaumond, Ana Acuña Morales, Jason C Ong, Sairam Parthasarathy, Christine Rini, Phyllis C Zee, Edward J Tanner, Sonia Ancoli-Israel, Frank J Penedo, Juned Siddique, Lisa M Wu, Kathryn J Reid, Karen Kaiser\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tbm/ibaf001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sleep disturbance is among the most frequent and distressing symptoms reported by gynecologic cancer survivors. Existing evidence-based behavioral sleep interventions are limited by implementation burden, which can decrease adherence.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>As part of the preparation phase of the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST), this study solicited stakeholder feedback to maximize adherence in a planned behavioral sleep/circadian intervention optimization trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirteen post-treatment survivors of early-stage gynecologic cancer completed the protocol for the planned optimization trial, including simultaneous receipt of all candidate intervention components. This included six weeks of combined sleep restriction, stimulus control, and systematic exposure to morning bright light. Participants then completed a semi-structured interview to provide feedback on their experience. We used a rapid analytic approach to quickly identify actionable feedback from de-identified transcripts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants generally reacted positively to the intervention components. Actionable feedback identified recommended protocol modifications and was categorized into four overarching themes: (i) remove barriers to engagement; (ii) revise for clarity; (iii) augment content; and (iv) consider individual circumstances.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rapid qualitative analysis enabled us to effectively modify our planned study protocol on an expedited timeline. This approach is consistent with the core principles of MOST and can be incorporated into the Preparation phase to enhance optimization efforts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Behavioral Medicine\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11795304/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Behavioral Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibaf001\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibaf001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:睡眠障碍是妇科癌症幸存者报告的最常见和最痛苦的症状之一。现有的循证行为睡眠干预措施受到实施负担的限制,可能会降低依从性。目的:作为多阶段优化策略(MOST)准备阶段的一部分,本研究征求了利益相关者的反馈,以最大限度地提高计划行为睡眠/昼夜节律干预优化试验的依从性。方法:13例早期妇科癌症治疗后幸存者完成了计划优化试验方案,包括同时接受所有候选干预成分。这包括为期六周的睡眠限制、刺激控制和系统的晨光照射。然后,参与者完成了一个半结构化的访谈,以提供他们的体验反馈。我们使用了一种快速分析方法,从去识别的转录本中快速识别出可操作的反馈。结果:参与者普遍对干预成分反应积极。可采取行动的反馈确定了建议的协议修改,并分为四个总体主题:(i)消除参与障碍;(ii)为清晰而修订;(iii)扩充内容;(iv)考虑个人情况。结论:快速定性分析使我们能够在更快的时间内有效地修改我们计划的研究方案。这种方法与MOST的核心原则是一致的,并且可以纳入准备阶段以增强优化工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stakeholder-informed refinement of a behavioral sleep/circadian intervention for gynecologic cancer survivors: an application of the MOST preparation phase.

Background: Sleep disturbance is among the most frequent and distressing symptoms reported by gynecologic cancer survivors. Existing evidence-based behavioral sleep interventions are limited by implementation burden, which can decrease adherence.

Purpose: As part of the preparation phase of the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST), this study solicited stakeholder feedback to maximize adherence in a planned behavioral sleep/circadian intervention optimization trial.

Methods: Thirteen post-treatment survivors of early-stage gynecologic cancer completed the protocol for the planned optimization trial, including simultaneous receipt of all candidate intervention components. This included six weeks of combined sleep restriction, stimulus control, and systematic exposure to morning bright light. Participants then completed a semi-structured interview to provide feedback on their experience. We used a rapid analytic approach to quickly identify actionable feedback from de-identified transcripts.

Results: Participants generally reacted positively to the intervention components. Actionable feedback identified recommended protocol modifications and was categorized into four overarching themes: (i) remove barriers to engagement; (ii) revise for clarity; (iii) augment content; and (iv) consider individual circumstances.

Conclusions: Rapid qualitative analysis enabled us to effectively modify our planned study protocol on an expedited timeline. This approach is consistent with the core principles of MOST and can be incorporated into the Preparation phase to enhance optimization efforts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Translational Behavioral Medicine
Translational Behavioral Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Translational Behavioral Medicine publishes content that engages, informs, and catalyzes dialogue about behavioral medicine among the research, practice, and policy communities. TBM began receiving an Impact Factor in 2015 and currently holds an Impact Factor of 2.989. TBM is one of two journals published by the Society of Behavioral Medicine. The Society of Behavioral Medicine is a multidisciplinary organization of clinicians, educators, and scientists dedicated to promoting the study of the interactions of behavior with biology and the environment, and then applying that knowledge to improve the health and well-being of individuals, families, communities, and populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信