父亲身份、家庭法以及男孩和男人的危机。

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Columbia Law Review Pub Date : 2024-11-01
June Carbone, Clare Huntington
{"title":"父亲身份、家庭法以及男孩和男人的危机。","authors":"June Carbone, Clare Huntington","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Boys and men in all racial and ethnic groups and across most socioeconomic groups are struggling on many fronts, including education, employment, physical and mental health, and social integration. In these areas and more, boys and men are much worse off than they were only a few decades ago. The crisis-which is concentrated among men without college degrees-is rooted in large-scale structural changes to the economy that have decimated jobs for this group and policy choices that emphasize incarceration while doing little to address economic inequality. The decline in male well-being is not just a problem for boys and men. It is a problem for families. Men's economic prospects have a profound impact on whether couples will commit to each other. Men without steady work-and with behaviors that often accompany unemployment, including a higher frequency of intimate partner violence-have trouble sustaining long-term relationships, and many do not marry. They often have children, but once romantic relationships end, unmarried men tend to drift away from the family. Many fathers want a larger role in their children's lives, but this is possible only if they can strengthen their relationship with mothers. Many mothers also want fathers to be more involved, but they are concerned about issues fathers bring to the family. And children want a relationship with both parents. Family law is part of the problem, contributing to the familial isolation of men without college degrees. In recent decades, family law has undergone a significant transformation, but this transformation primarily benefits married couples. The legal system now seeks to create \"postdivorce families\"-that is, families in which both parents are cooperative, active caregivers, notwithstanding the end of the parents' romantic relationship. To this end, custody laws encourage shared parenting, and family courts offer alternative dispute resolution processes, counseling, and other assistance that strengthen fathers' active membership in the family. But men facing economic precarity are unlikely to be married and thus need not go to court when a romantic relationship ends. Accordingly, these men do not benefit from this transformation in custody rules and processes, and they are unlikely to access the supportive services. The child support system makes things worse by imposing unrealistic orders on low-income fathers that alienate men from their families. And the family regulation system, also known as the child welfare system, treats these fathers as incompetent caregivers or, even worse, as threats. Family law may relegate men in crisis to the periphery of family life, but it can also help bring them back. The goal is not to restore men's patriarchal authority but rather to extend the model of cooperative parenting to more families. To this end, this Essay proposes far-reaching reforms to custody rules and processes, child support, and family regulation. In each of these problematic areas of family law, the proposed reforms give families greater autonomy in shaping agreements about family relationships, support to make these bargains workable, and opportunities for men to be active fathers.</p>","PeriodicalId":51408,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Law Review","volume":"124 7","pages":"2153-2238"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11790293/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FATHERHOOD, FAMILY LAW, AND THE CRISIS OF BOYS AND MEN.\",\"authors\":\"June Carbone, Clare Huntington\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Boys and men in all racial and ethnic groups and across most socioeconomic groups are struggling on many fronts, including education, employment, physical and mental health, and social integration. In these areas and more, boys and men are much worse off than they were only a few decades ago. The crisis-which is concentrated among men without college degrees-is rooted in large-scale structural changes to the economy that have decimated jobs for this group and policy choices that emphasize incarceration while doing little to address economic inequality. The decline in male well-being is not just a problem for boys and men. It is a problem for families. Men's economic prospects have a profound impact on whether couples will commit to each other. Men without steady work-and with behaviors that often accompany unemployment, including a higher frequency of intimate partner violence-have trouble sustaining long-term relationships, and many do not marry. They often have children, but once romantic relationships end, unmarried men tend to drift away from the family. Many fathers want a larger role in their children's lives, but this is possible only if they can strengthen their relationship with mothers. Many mothers also want fathers to be more involved, but they are concerned about issues fathers bring to the family. And children want a relationship with both parents. Family law is part of the problem, contributing to the familial isolation of men without college degrees. In recent decades, family law has undergone a significant transformation, but this transformation primarily benefits married couples. The legal system now seeks to create \\\"postdivorce families\\\"-that is, families in which both parents are cooperative, active caregivers, notwithstanding the end of the parents' romantic relationship. To this end, custody laws encourage shared parenting, and family courts offer alternative dispute resolution processes, counseling, and other assistance that strengthen fathers' active membership in the family. But men facing economic precarity are unlikely to be married and thus need not go to court when a romantic relationship ends. Accordingly, these men do not benefit from this transformation in custody rules and processes, and they are unlikely to access the supportive services. The child support system makes things worse by imposing unrealistic orders on low-income fathers that alienate men from their families. And the family regulation system, also known as the child welfare system, treats these fathers as incompetent caregivers or, even worse, as threats. Family law may relegate men in crisis to the periphery of family life, but it can also help bring them back. The goal is not to restore men's patriarchal authority but rather to extend the model of cooperative parenting to more families. To this end, this Essay proposes far-reaching reforms to custody rules and processes, child support, and family regulation. In each of these problematic areas of family law, the proposed reforms give families greater autonomy in shaping agreements about family relationships, support to make these bargains workable, and opportunities for men to be active fathers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Columbia Law Review\",\"volume\":\"124 7\",\"pages\":\"2153-2238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11790293/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Columbia Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Columbia Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

所有种族和族裔群体以及大多数社会经济群体的男孩和男子都在许多方面挣扎,包括教育、就业、身心健康和社会融合。在这些地区以及更多地区,男孩和男人的境况比几十年前差得多。这场危机主要集中在没有大学学位的男性身上,其根源在于大规模的经济结构变化,这种变化导致这一群体的就业机会大幅减少,政策选择强调监禁,而对解决经济不平等问题却无所作为。男性幸福感的下降不仅仅是男孩和男人的问题。这是一个家庭的问题。男性的经济前景对夫妻是否会彼此承诺有着深远的影响。没有稳定工作的男性——以及经常伴随失业而来的行为,包括更频繁的亲密伴侣暴力——难以维持长期的关系,许多人不结婚。他们通常有孩子,但一旦恋情结束,未婚男性往往会远离家庭。许多父亲希望在孩子的生活中扮演更重要的角色,但这只有在他们能加强与母亲的关系的情况下才有可能实现。许多母亲也希望父亲更多地参与进来,但她们担心父亲给家庭带来的问题。孩子们希望与父母双方都保持关系。家庭法是问题的一部分,它导致了没有大学学位的男性在家庭中的孤立。近几十年来,家庭法经历了重大变革,但这种变革主要惠及已婚夫妇。现在的法律体系寻求创造“离婚后家庭”——即父母双方都是合作的,积极的照顾者,尽管父母的浪漫关系已经结束。为此目的,监护法鼓励共同抚养子女,家庭法院提供替代性纠纷解决程序、咨询和其他帮助,以加强父亲在家庭中的积极成员地位。但面临经济不稳定的男性不太可能结婚,因此当一段浪漫关系结束时,他们不需要上法庭。因此,这些人不能从羁押规则和程序的转变中受益,他们也不太可能获得支持性服务。子女抚养制度把不切实际的命令强加给低收入的父亲,使情况变得更糟,这使男性与家庭疏远。而家庭管理系统,也被称为儿童福利系统,把这些父亲视为无能的照顾者,甚至更糟,是威胁。家庭法可能会把处于危机中的男性排挤到家庭生活的边缘,但它也可以帮助他们回归家庭生活。其目标不是恢复男性的父权权威,而是将合作育儿的模式推广到更多的家庭。为此,本文建议对监护规则和程序、子女抚养和家庭管理进行深远的改革。在家庭法的每一个问题领域,拟议的改革都赋予家庭更大的自主权,以形成关于家庭关系的协议,支持这些交易的可行性,并为男性提供积极担任父亲的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
FATHERHOOD, FAMILY LAW, AND THE CRISIS OF BOYS AND MEN.

Boys and men in all racial and ethnic groups and across most socioeconomic groups are struggling on many fronts, including education, employment, physical and mental health, and social integration. In these areas and more, boys and men are much worse off than they were only a few decades ago. The crisis-which is concentrated among men without college degrees-is rooted in large-scale structural changes to the economy that have decimated jobs for this group and policy choices that emphasize incarceration while doing little to address economic inequality. The decline in male well-being is not just a problem for boys and men. It is a problem for families. Men's economic prospects have a profound impact on whether couples will commit to each other. Men without steady work-and with behaviors that often accompany unemployment, including a higher frequency of intimate partner violence-have trouble sustaining long-term relationships, and many do not marry. They often have children, but once romantic relationships end, unmarried men tend to drift away from the family. Many fathers want a larger role in their children's lives, but this is possible only if they can strengthen their relationship with mothers. Many mothers also want fathers to be more involved, but they are concerned about issues fathers bring to the family. And children want a relationship with both parents. Family law is part of the problem, contributing to the familial isolation of men without college degrees. In recent decades, family law has undergone a significant transformation, but this transformation primarily benefits married couples. The legal system now seeks to create "postdivorce families"-that is, families in which both parents are cooperative, active caregivers, notwithstanding the end of the parents' romantic relationship. To this end, custody laws encourage shared parenting, and family courts offer alternative dispute resolution processes, counseling, and other assistance that strengthen fathers' active membership in the family. But men facing economic precarity are unlikely to be married and thus need not go to court when a romantic relationship ends. Accordingly, these men do not benefit from this transformation in custody rules and processes, and they are unlikely to access the supportive services. The child support system makes things worse by imposing unrealistic orders on low-income fathers that alienate men from their families. And the family regulation system, also known as the child welfare system, treats these fathers as incompetent caregivers or, even worse, as threats. Family law may relegate men in crisis to the periphery of family life, but it can also help bring them back. The goal is not to restore men's patriarchal authority but rather to extend the model of cooperative parenting to more families. To this end, this Essay proposes far-reaching reforms to custody rules and processes, child support, and family regulation. In each of these problematic areas of family law, the proposed reforms give families greater autonomy in shaping agreements about family relationships, support to make these bargains workable, and opportunities for men to be active fathers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Columbia Law Review is one of the world"s leading publications of legal scholarship. Founded in 1901, the Review is an independent nonprofit corporation that produces a law journal edited and published entirely by students at Columbia Law School. It is one of a handful of student-edited law journals in the nation that publish eight issues a year. The Review is the third most widely distributed and cited law review in the country. It receives about 2,000 submissions per year and selects approximately 20-25 manuscripts for publication annually, in addition to student Notes. In 2008, the Review expanded its audience with the launch of Sidebar, an online supplement to the Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信