中文成人阅读史问卷(ARHQ)的开发与有效性。

IF 1.9 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Dyslexia Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1002/dys.1802
Yuxiao He, Jiuqing Tang, Xinyan Yang, Zujun Song, Ning Ding, Yao Jia, Li Liu, Jingjing Zhao
{"title":"中文成人阅读史问卷(ARHQ)的开发与有效性。","authors":"Yuxiao He,&nbsp;Jiuqing Tang,&nbsp;Xinyan Yang,&nbsp;Zujun Song,&nbsp;Ning Ding,&nbsp;Yao Jia,&nbsp;Li Liu,&nbsp;Jingjing Zhao","doi":"10.1002/dys.1802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Adult Reading History Questionnaire (ARHQ) is a popular instrument for screening dyslexia in adults. Yet, there is no evidence suggesting its applicability in Chinese. The present study aims to develop a Chinese Adult Reading History Questionnaire (Chinese-ARHQ) and to assess its validity among Chinese adults. A total of 2439 Chinese adults completed the questionnaire of Chinese-ARHQ with 2234 questionnaires valid for further analysis (<i>N</i><sub>males</sub> = 825, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 26.29 years, SD<sub>age</sub> = 9.12). Among these participants, 184 completed the questionnaire twice and 221 completed reading-related tests. Results showed that the Chinese-ARHQ had good internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's <i>α</i> = 0.88), and the test–retest reliability was 0.81. Three factors (current reading, dyslexia symptoms and memory) were extracted through exploratory factor analysis. The scores of Chinese-ARHQ and its factors were both related to reading and phonological skills, revealing the good criterion validity of the questionnaire. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that the optimal threshold for the Chinese-ARHQ was 0.36 with a sensitivity of 83.3% and a specificity of 75.9%. Additionally, adults screened by the Chinese-ARHQ (&gt; 0.36) performed worse in reading and phonological awareness, further validating the Chinese-ARHQ as a reliable screening tool for Chinese dyslexia in adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":47222,"journal":{"name":"Dyslexia","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dys.1802","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validity of the Adult Reading History Questionnaire (ARHQ) for Chinese\",\"authors\":\"Yuxiao He,&nbsp;Jiuqing Tang,&nbsp;Xinyan Yang,&nbsp;Zujun Song,&nbsp;Ning Ding,&nbsp;Yao Jia,&nbsp;Li Liu,&nbsp;Jingjing Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dys.1802\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Adult Reading History Questionnaire (ARHQ) is a popular instrument for screening dyslexia in adults. Yet, there is no evidence suggesting its applicability in Chinese. The present study aims to develop a Chinese Adult Reading History Questionnaire (Chinese-ARHQ) and to assess its validity among Chinese adults. A total of 2439 Chinese adults completed the questionnaire of Chinese-ARHQ with 2234 questionnaires valid for further analysis (<i>N</i><sub>males</sub> = 825, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 26.29 years, SD<sub>age</sub> = 9.12). Among these participants, 184 completed the questionnaire twice and 221 completed reading-related tests. Results showed that the Chinese-ARHQ had good internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's <i>α</i> = 0.88), and the test–retest reliability was 0.81. Three factors (current reading, dyslexia symptoms and memory) were extracted through exploratory factor analysis. The scores of Chinese-ARHQ and its factors were both related to reading and phonological skills, revealing the good criterion validity of the questionnaire. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that the optimal threshold for the Chinese-ARHQ was 0.36 with a sensitivity of 83.3% and a specificity of 75.9%. Additionally, adults screened by the Chinese-ARHQ (&gt; 0.36) performed worse in reading and phonological awareness, further validating the Chinese-ARHQ as a reliable screening tool for Chinese dyslexia in adults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dyslexia\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dys.1802\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dyslexia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dys.1802\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dyslexia","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dys.1802","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

成人阅读史问卷(ARHQ)是筛查成人阅读障碍的常用工具。然而,目前还没有证据表明它适用于中文。本研究旨在开发中文成人阅读史问卷(Chinese-ARHQ),并评估其在中国成人中的有效性。共有2439名中国成年人填写了中文成人阅读史问卷,其中2234份问卷有效(男性=825人,年龄=26.29岁,平均年龄=9.12岁)。其中,184 人完成了两次问卷,221 人完成了与阅读相关的测试。结果显示,中文-ARHQ具有良好的内部一致性信度(Cronbach's α = 0.88),测试-再测信度为0.81。通过探索性因子分析提取了三个因子(当前阅读、阅读障碍症状和记忆)。中文-ARHQ及其因子的得分均与阅读能力和语音能力相关,表明问卷具有良好的标准效度。接受者操作特征(ROC)分析显示,中文-ARHQ的最佳临界值为0.36,灵敏度为83.3%,特异度为75.9%。此外,通过中文-ARHQ筛查的成人(> 0.36)在阅读和语音意识方面表现较差,这进一步验证了中文-ARHQ是筛查成人中文阅读障碍的可靠工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and Validity of the Adult Reading History Questionnaire (ARHQ) for Chinese

The Adult Reading History Questionnaire (ARHQ) is a popular instrument for screening dyslexia in adults. Yet, there is no evidence suggesting its applicability in Chinese. The present study aims to develop a Chinese Adult Reading History Questionnaire (Chinese-ARHQ) and to assess its validity among Chinese adults. A total of 2439 Chinese adults completed the questionnaire of Chinese-ARHQ with 2234 questionnaires valid for further analysis (Nmales = 825, Mage = 26.29 years, SDage = 9.12). Among these participants, 184 completed the questionnaire twice and 221 completed reading-related tests. Results showed that the Chinese-ARHQ had good internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.88), and the test–retest reliability was 0.81. Three factors (current reading, dyslexia symptoms and memory) were extracted through exploratory factor analysis. The scores of Chinese-ARHQ and its factors were both related to reading and phonological skills, revealing the good criterion validity of the questionnaire. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that the optimal threshold for the Chinese-ARHQ was 0.36 with a sensitivity of 83.3% and a specificity of 75.9%. Additionally, adults screened by the Chinese-ARHQ (> 0.36) performed worse in reading and phonological awareness, further validating the Chinese-ARHQ as a reliable screening tool for Chinese dyslexia in adults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dyslexia
Dyslexia Multiple-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: DYSLEXIA provides reviews and reports of research, assessment and intervention practice. In many fields of enquiry theoretical advances often occur in response to practical needs; and a central aim of the journal is to bring together researchers and practitioners in the field of dyslexia, so that each can learn from the other. Interesting developments, both theoretical and practical, are being reported in many different countries: DYSLEXIA is a forum in which a knowledge of these developments can be shared by readers in all parts of the world. The scope of the journal includes relevant aspects of Cognitive, Educational, Developmental and Clinical Psychology Child and Adult Special Education and Remedial Education Therapy and Counselling Neuroscience, Psychiatry and General Medicine The scope of the journal includes relevant aspects of: - Cognitive, Educational, Developmental and Clinical Psychology - Child and Adult Special Education and Remedial Education - Therapy and Counselling - Neuroscience, Psychiatry and General Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信