动物进化过程中代谢率是否影响全基因组氨基酸组成?

IF 3.7 1区 生物学 Q2 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Evolution Letters Pub Date : 2024-11-08 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1093/evlett/qrae061
Wei Wang, De-Xing Zhang
{"title":"动物进化过程中代谢率是否影响全基因组氨基酸组成?","authors":"Wei Wang, De-Xing Zhang","doi":"10.1093/evlett/qrae061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Natural selection is believed to shape amino acid usage of the proteome by minimizing the energy cost of protein biosynthesis. Although this hypothesis explains well the amino acid frequency (AA<sub>frequency</sub>) difference among the 20 common amino acids within a given genome (species), whether it is applicable to cross-species difference remains to be inspected. Here, we proposed and tested a \"metabolic rate hypothesis,\" which suggests that metabolic rate impacts genome-wide AA<sub>frequency</sub>, considering that the energy allocated to protein biosynthesis is under selection pressure due to metabolic rate constraint. We performed integrated phylogenetic comparative analyses on proteomic sequence and metabolic rate data of 166 species covering 130 eumetazoan orders. We showed that resting metabolic rate (RMR) was significantly linked to AA<sub>frequency</sub> variation across animal lineages, with a contribution comparable to or greater than genomic traits such as GC content and codon usage bias. Consistent with the metabolic rate hypothesis, low-energy-cost amino acids are observed to be more likely at higher frequency in animal species with high (residual) metabolic rate. Correlated evolution of RMR and AA<sub>frequency</sub> was further inferred being driven by adaptation. The relationship between RMR and AA<sub>frequency</sub> varied greatly among amino acids, most likely reflecting a trade-off among various interacting factors. Overall, there exists no \"one-size-fits-all\" predictor for AA<sub>frequency</sub>, and integrated investigation of multilevel traits is indispensable for a fuller understanding of AA<sub>frequency</sub> variation and evolution in animal.</p>","PeriodicalId":48629,"journal":{"name":"Evolution Letters","volume":"9 1","pages":"137-149"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11790228/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does metabolic rate influence genome-wide amino acid composition in the course of animal evolution?\",\"authors\":\"Wei Wang, De-Xing Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/evlett/qrae061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Natural selection is believed to shape amino acid usage of the proteome by minimizing the energy cost of protein biosynthesis. Although this hypothesis explains well the amino acid frequency (AA<sub>frequency</sub>) difference among the 20 common amino acids within a given genome (species), whether it is applicable to cross-species difference remains to be inspected. Here, we proposed and tested a \\\"metabolic rate hypothesis,\\\" which suggests that metabolic rate impacts genome-wide AA<sub>frequency</sub>, considering that the energy allocated to protein biosynthesis is under selection pressure due to metabolic rate constraint. We performed integrated phylogenetic comparative analyses on proteomic sequence and metabolic rate data of 166 species covering 130 eumetazoan orders. We showed that resting metabolic rate (RMR) was significantly linked to AA<sub>frequency</sub> variation across animal lineages, with a contribution comparable to or greater than genomic traits such as GC content and codon usage bias. Consistent with the metabolic rate hypothesis, low-energy-cost amino acids are observed to be more likely at higher frequency in animal species with high (residual) metabolic rate. Correlated evolution of RMR and AA<sub>frequency</sub> was further inferred being driven by adaptation. The relationship between RMR and AA<sub>frequency</sub> varied greatly among amino acids, most likely reflecting a trade-off among various interacting factors. Overall, there exists no \\\"one-size-fits-all\\\" predictor for AA<sub>frequency</sub>, and integrated investigation of multilevel traits is indispensable for a fuller understanding of AA<sub>frequency</sub> variation and evolution in animal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evolution Letters\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"137-149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11790228/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evolution Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/evlett/qrae061\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolution Letters","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/evlett/qrae061","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自然选择被认为通过最小化蛋白质生物合成的能量成本来塑造蛋白质组的氨基酸使用。虽然这一假设很好地解释了特定基因组(物种)内20种常见氨基酸之间的氨基酸频率差异,但它是否适用于跨物种差异仍有待检验。在这里,我们提出并测试了一个“代谢率假说”,该假说认为代谢率影响全基因组的afrequency,考虑到由于代谢率的限制,分配给蛋白质生物合成的能量受到选择压力。对130个真生动物目166种的蛋白质组学序列和代谢率数据进行了系统发育比较分析。我们发现静息代谢率(RMR)与动物谱系中的afrequency变异显著相关,其贡献与GC含量和密码子使用偏差等基因组性状相当或更大。与代谢率假说一致,低能量成本氨基酸在高(残余)代谢率的动物物种中更可能以更高的频率出现。进一步推断RMR和afrequency的相关演化是由适应驱动的。RMR和afrequency之间的关系在氨基酸之间差异很大,很可能反映了各种相互作用因素之间的权衡。综上所述,afrequency不存在“一刀切”的预测因子,为了更全面地了解动物afrequency的变异和进化,对多水平性状进行综合研究是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does metabolic rate influence genome-wide amino acid composition in the course of animal evolution?

Natural selection is believed to shape amino acid usage of the proteome by minimizing the energy cost of protein biosynthesis. Although this hypothesis explains well the amino acid frequency (AAfrequency) difference among the 20 common amino acids within a given genome (species), whether it is applicable to cross-species difference remains to be inspected. Here, we proposed and tested a "metabolic rate hypothesis," which suggests that metabolic rate impacts genome-wide AAfrequency, considering that the energy allocated to protein biosynthesis is under selection pressure due to metabolic rate constraint. We performed integrated phylogenetic comparative analyses on proteomic sequence and metabolic rate data of 166 species covering 130 eumetazoan orders. We showed that resting metabolic rate (RMR) was significantly linked to AAfrequency variation across animal lineages, with a contribution comparable to or greater than genomic traits such as GC content and codon usage bias. Consistent with the metabolic rate hypothesis, low-energy-cost amino acids are observed to be more likely at higher frequency in animal species with high (residual) metabolic rate. Correlated evolution of RMR and AAfrequency was further inferred being driven by adaptation. The relationship between RMR and AAfrequency varied greatly among amino acids, most likely reflecting a trade-off among various interacting factors. Overall, there exists no "one-size-fits-all" predictor for AAfrequency, and integrated investigation of multilevel traits is indispensable for a fuller understanding of AAfrequency variation and evolution in animal.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evolution Letters
Evolution Letters EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Evolution Letters publishes cutting-edge new research in all areas of Evolutionary Biology. Available exclusively online, and entirely open access, Evolution Letters consists of Letters - original pieces of research which form the bulk of papers - and Comments and Opinion - a forum for highlighting timely new research ideas for the evolutionary community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信