应用琼脂稀释法和自动微肉汤稀释法测定尿路感染临床分离细菌对磷霉素及比较抗生素的敏感性。

IF 3.8 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Microbiology spectrum Pub Date : 2025-03-04 Epub Date: 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1128/spectrum.01860-24
Jamie L Dombach, Nancy C Smith, Teresa Kottiri, Alicia M Schiller, Edwin Kamau
{"title":"应用琼脂稀释法和自动微肉汤稀释法测定尿路感染临床分离细菌对磷霉素及比较抗生素的敏感性。","authors":"Jamie L Dombach, Nancy C Smith, Teresa Kottiri, Alicia M Schiller, Edwin Kamau","doi":"10.1128/spectrum.01860-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Uncomplicated bacteremic urinary tract infections (bUTIs) are common, often caused by <i>Escherichia coli</i>, <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i>, and <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i>, with most encounters treated empirically. As rates of antimicrobial resistance increase, available antibiotic treatment options are dwindling. Novel antibiotics approved for treating bUTIs are limited, leading to a resurgence of interest in older antibiotics, including fosfomycin. Here, clinical urine samples from patients including military personnel, retirees, and their dependents diagnosed with bUTIs from a military hospital located in Bethesda, Maryland, were tested for susceptibility to fosfomycin and comparator antibiotics (levofloxacin, nitrofurantoin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole [TMS]). A total of 1,353 nonduplicate bacterial isolates were tested, including 605 non-ESBL and 285 ESBL <i>E. coli</i>, and 84 non-ESBL and 52 ESBL <i>K. pneumoniae</i>. Fosfomycin susceptibility rates were similar for non-ESBL and ESBL <i>E. coli</i> (95.9% vs 96.1%) and <i>K. pneumoniae</i> (38.1% vs 36.5%). Fosfomycin demonstrated high activity against other Enterobacterales and gram-positive organisms including <i>Enterobacter faecalis</i> and <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>. Interestingly, most fosfomycin non-susceptible isolates were susceptible to other first-line bUTI treatment options, and most isolates that were non-susceptible to other first-line bUTI treatment option were susceptible to fosfomycin. ESBL <i>K. pneumoniae</i> isolates were the least susceptible to current first-line treatment options. Fosfomycin Etest demonstrated high sensitivity compared to agar dilution, making it a viable AST testing method especially in resource-limited areas. Overall, we demonstrated fosfomycin has high activity against common etiologies that cause bUTIs. Further clinical efficacy studies investigating the use of fosfomycin in treating non-<i>E</i>. <i>coli</i> bUTI pathogens, as single or combination therapy, are warranted.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>Uncomplicated bUTIs are often caused by <i>Escherichia coli</i>, <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i>, and <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i>. Fosfomycin is one of the recommended firstline antibiotics for the treatment of symptomatic, uncomplicated bUTIs. Fosfomycin susceptibility testing is complicated by the fact that although both CLSI and EUCAST recognize agar dilution (AD) as the reference method albeit being labor-intensive, breakpoints are different, and Etest is only approved by EUCAST. We investigated the susceptibility of bUTI clinical isolates to fosfomycin using AD and compared performance in a subset of isolates to Etest. Fosfomycin susceptibility profiles of bacterial isolates were compared to other firstline antibiotics. We found isolates were susceptible to fosfomycin at similar or higher rates compared to other firstline antibiotics. Importantly, fosfomycin was effective against isolates producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamases and those that were resistant to other firstline treatments. Furthermore, our data showed Etest was a viable option for susceptibility testing with 94% agreement to the AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":18670,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology spectrum","volume":" ","pages":"e0186024"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11878007/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antimicrobial susceptibilities of clinical bacterial isolates from urinary tract infections to fosfomycin and comparator antibiotics determined by agar dilution method and automated micro broth dilution.\",\"authors\":\"Jamie L Dombach, Nancy C Smith, Teresa Kottiri, Alicia M Schiller, Edwin Kamau\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/spectrum.01860-24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Uncomplicated bacteremic urinary tract infections (bUTIs) are common, often caused by <i>Escherichia coli</i>, <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i>, and <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i>, with most encounters treated empirically. As rates of antimicrobial resistance increase, available antibiotic treatment options are dwindling. Novel antibiotics approved for treating bUTIs are limited, leading to a resurgence of interest in older antibiotics, including fosfomycin. Here, clinical urine samples from patients including military personnel, retirees, and their dependents diagnosed with bUTIs from a military hospital located in Bethesda, Maryland, were tested for susceptibility to fosfomycin and comparator antibiotics (levofloxacin, nitrofurantoin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole [TMS]). A total of 1,353 nonduplicate bacterial isolates were tested, including 605 non-ESBL and 285 ESBL <i>E. coli</i>, and 84 non-ESBL and 52 ESBL <i>K. pneumoniae</i>. Fosfomycin susceptibility rates were similar for non-ESBL and ESBL <i>E. coli</i> (95.9% vs 96.1%) and <i>K. pneumoniae</i> (38.1% vs 36.5%). Fosfomycin demonstrated high activity against other Enterobacterales and gram-positive organisms including <i>Enterobacter faecalis</i> and <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>. Interestingly, most fosfomycin non-susceptible isolates were susceptible to other first-line bUTI treatment options, and most isolates that were non-susceptible to other first-line bUTI treatment option were susceptible to fosfomycin. ESBL <i>K. pneumoniae</i> isolates were the least susceptible to current first-line treatment options. Fosfomycin Etest demonstrated high sensitivity compared to agar dilution, making it a viable AST testing method especially in resource-limited areas. Overall, we demonstrated fosfomycin has high activity against common etiologies that cause bUTIs. Further clinical efficacy studies investigating the use of fosfomycin in treating non-<i>E</i>. <i>coli</i> bUTI pathogens, as single or combination therapy, are warranted.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>Uncomplicated bUTIs are often caused by <i>Escherichia coli</i>, <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i>, and <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i>. Fosfomycin is one of the recommended firstline antibiotics for the treatment of symptomatic, uncomplicated bUTIs. Fosfomycin susceptibility testing is complicated by the fact that although both CLSI and EUCAST recognize agar dilution (AD) as the reference method albeit being labor-intensive, breakpoints are different, and Etest is only approved by EUCAST. We investigated the susceptibility of bUTI clinical isolates to fosfomycin using AD and compared performance in a subset of isolates to Etest. Fosfomycin susceptibility profiles of bacterial isolates were compared to other firstline antibiotics. We found isolates were susceptible to fosfomycin at similar or higher rates compared to other firstline antibiotics. Importantly, fosfomycin was effective against isolates producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamases and those that were resistant to other firstline treatments. Furthermore, our data showed Etest was a viable option for susceptibility testing with 94% agreement to the AD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microbiology spectrum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e0186024\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11878007/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microbiology spectrum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01860-24\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01860-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无并发症的菌血症性尿路感染(bUTIs)很常见,通常由大肠埃希菌、肺炎克雷伯菌和粪肠球菌引起,大多数情况下都是经验性治疗。随着抗菌药耐药性的增加,可用的抗生素治疗方案越来越少。获准用于治疗细菌性尿道炎的新型抗生素非常有限,这导致人们对包括磷霉素在内的老式抗生素重新产生了兴趣。马里兰州贝塞斯达一家军事医院对包括军人、退休人员及其家属在内的被诊断患有细菌性尿道炎的患者的临床尿液样本进行了磷霉素和同类抗生素(左氧氟沙星、硝基呋喃妥因和三甲双胍-磺胺甲噁唑 [TMS])药敏试验。共检测了 1,353 个不重复的细菌分离物,其中包括 605 个非 ESBL 大肠杆菌和 285 个 ESBL 大肠杆菌,以及 84 个非 ESBL 肺炎双球菌和 52 个 ESBL 肺炎双球菌。非ESBL和ESBL大肠杆菌(95.9% vs 96.1%)和肺炎克氏菌(38.1% vs 36.5%)对磷霉素的敏感率相似。磷霉素对其他肠杆菌和革兰氏阳性菌(包括粪肠杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌)具有很高的活性。有趣的是,大多数对磷霉素不敏感的分离株对其他一线治疗方案也敏感,而大多数对其他一线治疗方案不敏感的分离株对磷霉素也敏感。ESBL肺炎克氏菌分离株对目前的一线治疗方案最不敏感。与琼脂稀释法相比,磷霉素Etest法显示出较高的灵敏度,使其成为一种可行的AST检测方法,尤其是在资源有限的地区。总之,我们证明了磷霉素对引起细菌性尿道炎的常见病原体具有很高的活性。有必要进一步开展临床疗效研究,调查磷霉素在治疗非大肠杆菌引起的急性尿路感染病原体方面的应用,无论是作为单一疗法还是联合疗法:重要性:非复杂性 bUTI 通常由大肠埃希菌、肺炎克雷伯菌和粪肠球菌引起。磷霉素是治疗无症状、无并发症的细菌性尿道炎的推荐一线抗生素之一。虽然 CLSI 和 EUCAST 都认可琼脂稀释法(AD)作为参考方法,但由于该方法耗费大量人力,且断点不同,Etest 只被 EUCAST 认可,因此磷霉素药敏试验变得非常复杂。我们使用 AD 法研究了 bUTI 临床分离株对磷霉素的敏感性,并将分离株子集的敏感性与 Etest 法进行了比较。将细菌分离物对磷霉素的药敏谱与其他一线抗生素进行了比较。我们发现,与其他一线抗生素相比,分离菌对磷霉素的敏感率相似或更高。重要的是,磷霉素对产生广谱β-内酰胺酶的分离菌和对其他一线治疗产生耐药性的分离菌有效。此外,我们的数据还显示,Etest 是药敏试验的可行选择,与 AD 的一致性高达 94%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antimicrobial susceptibilities of clinical bacterial isolates from urinary tract infections to fosfomycin and comparator antibiotics determined by agar dilution method and automated micro broth dilution.

Uncomplicated bacteremic urinary tract infections (bUTIs) are common, often caused by Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterococcus faecalis, with most encounters treated empirically. As rates of antimicrobial resistance increase, available antibiotic treatment options are dwindling. Novel antibiotics approved for treating bUTIs are limited, leading to a resurgence of interest in older antibiotics, including fosfomycin. Here, clinical urine samples from patients including military personnel, retirees, and their dependents diagnosed with bUTIs from a military hospital located in Bethesda, Maryland, were tested for susceptibility to fosfomycin and comparator antibiotics (levofloxacin, nitrofurantoin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole [TMS]). A total of 1,353 nonduplicate bacterial isolates were tested, including 605 non-ESBL and 285 ESBL E. coli, and 84 non-ESBL and 52 ESBL K. pneumoniae. Fosfomycin susceptibility rates were similar for non-ESBL and ESBL E. coli (95.9% vs 96.1%) and K. pneumoniae (38.1% vs 36.5%). Fosfomycin demonstrated high activity against other Enterobacterales and gram-positive organisms including Enterobacter faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus. Interestingly, most fosfomycin non-susceptible isolates were susceptible to other first-line bUTI treatment options, and most isolates that were non-susceptible to other first-line bUTI treatment option were susceptible to fosfomycin. ESBL K. pneumoniae isolates were the least susceptible to current first-line treatment options. Fosfomycin Etest demonstrated high sensitivity compared to agar dilution, making it a viable AST testing method especially in resource-limited areas. Overall, we demonstrated fosfomycin has high activity against common etiologies that cause bUTIs. Further clinical efficacy studies investigating the use of fosfomycin in treating non-E. coli bUTI pathogens, as single or combination therapy, are warranted.

Importance: Uncomplicated bUTIs are often caused by Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterococcus faecalis. Fosfomycin is one of the recommended firstline antibiotics for the treatment of symptomatic, uncomplicated bUTIs. Fosfomycin susceptibility testing is complicated by the fact that although both CLSI and EUCAST recognize agar dilution (AD) as the reference method albeit being labor-intensive, breakpoints are different, and Etest is only approved by EUCAST. We investigated the susceptibility of bUTI clinical isolates to fosfomycin using AD and compared performance in a subset of isolates to Etest. Fosfomycin susceptibility profiles of bacterial isolates were compared to other firstline antibiotics. We found isolates were susceptible to fosfomycin at similar or higher rates compared to other firstline antibiotics. Importantly, fosfomycin was effective against isolates producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamases and those that were resistant to other firstline treatments. Furthermore, our data showed Etest was a viable option for susceptibility testing with 94% agreement to the AD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Microbiology spectrum
Microbiology spectrum Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
1800
期刊介绍: Microbiology Spectrum publishes commissioned review articles on topics in microbiology representing ten content areas: Archaea; Food Microbiology; Bacterial Genetics, Cell Biology, and Physiology; Clinical Microbiology; Environmental Microbiology and Ecology; Eukaryotic Microbes; Genomics, Computational, and Synthetic Microbiology; Immunology; Pathogenesis; and Virology. Reviews are interrelated, with each review linking to other related content. A large board of Microbiology Spectrum editors aids in the development of topics for potential reviews and in the identification of an editor, or editors, who shepherd each collection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信