对标MapRT和首次临床经验:无碰撞非共面治疗计划的新解决方案。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Mathieu Gonod, Ilyas Achag, Jad Farah, Léone Aubignac, Igor Bessieres
{"title":"对标MapRT和首次临床经验:无碰撞非共面治疗计划的新解决方案。","authors":"Mathieu Gonod,&nbsp;Ilyas Achag,&nbsp;Jad Farah,&nbsp;Léone Aubignac,&nbsp;Igor Bessieres","doi":"10.1002/acm2.14572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In recent years, complex re-irradiations and stereotactic treatments have triggered the use of non-coplanar treatments for better dose conformality, entailing risks of collision between the machine and the patient, couch, or immobilization device. To ensure the plans deliverability without collisions, time-consuming actions are typically performed, including dry runs, in-room couch rotations, and beam configuration tests during planning. To overcome these challenges, a new tool called MapRT (VisionRT Ltd., London, UK) was developed. MapRT predicts a clearance map based on a patients' 3D model (acquired with dedicated cameras at the CT simulation) and pre-established machine models. This work evaluates the accuracy of MapRT using a 30 × 35 × 40 cm<sup>3</sup> phantom and 64 gantry/couch collision coordinates on a Truebeam Linac (Varian, Palo Alto, USA). Collision coordinates were recorded for gantry and couch rotations. The agreement of real collision coordinates and MapRT's predictions was evaluated for different buffer margins around the couch/patient models customizable in MapRT. Results of the first clinical implementation of MapRT were also reported. With no buffer margin, MapRT's predictions and experimental collision coordinates showed small average differences but with large standard deviations for gantry (-0.5°±6.2°) and couch (-0.1°±4.8°) collision coordinates. When excluding the kV imaging components, these values were of -0.8°±3.5° for gantry and 0.4°±4.4° for couch. Finally, a 3 cm buffer margin allows for 100% accurate predictions by MapRT of gantry-to-phantom and gantry-to-couch collisions. Among the ∼900 treatment plans checked with MapRT, 22 collisions could be avoided while another 6 plans still incurred a collision but these are mainly due to users' oversights. MapRT easily predict collisions in complex treatment planning. This work demonstrated its reliability using a 3 cm buffer margin. MapRT is a promising tool for increasing security, time saving and workflow improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.14572","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benchmarking MapRT and first clinical experience: A novel solution for collision-free non-coplanar treatment planning\",\"authors\":\"Mathieu Gonod,&nbsp;Ilyas Achag,&nbsp;Jad Farah,&nbsp;Léone Aubignac,&nbsp;Igor Bessieres\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acm2.14572\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In recent years, complex re-irradiations and stereotactic treatments have triggered the use of non-coplanar treatments for better dose conformality, entailing risks of collision between the machine and the patient, couch, or immobilization device. To ensure the plans deliverability without collisions, time-consuming actions are typically performed, including dry runs, in-room couch rotations, and beam configuration tests during planning. To overcome these challenges, a new tool called MapRT (VisionRT Ltd., London, UK) was developed. MapRT predicts a clearance map based on a patients' 3D model (acquired with dedicated cameras at the CT simulation) and pre-established machine models. This work evaluates the accuracy of MapRT using a 30 × 35 × 40 cm<sup>3</sup> phantom and 64 gantry/couch collision coordinates on a Truebeam Linac (Varian, Palo Alto, USA). Collision coordinates were recorded for gantry and couch rotations. The agreement of real collision coordinates and MapRT's predictions was evaluated for different buffer margins around the couch/patient models customizable in MapRT. Results of the first clinical implementation of MapRT were also reported. With no buffer margin, MapRT's predictions and experimental collision coordinates showed small average differences but with large standard deviations for gantry (-0.5°±6.2°) and couch (-0.1°±4.8°) collision coordinates. When excluding the kV imaging components, these values were of -0.8°±3.5° for gantry and 0.4°±4.4° for couch. Finally, a 3 cm buffer margin allows for 100% accurate predictions by MapRT of gantry-to-phantom and gantry-to-couch collisions. Among the ∼900 treatment plans checked with MapRT, 22 collisions could be avoided while another 6 plans still incurred a collision but these are mainly due to users' oversights. MapRT easily predict collisions in complex treatment planning. This work demonstrated its reliability using a 3 cm buffer margin. MapRT is a promising tool for increasing security, time saving and workflow improvement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"26 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.14572\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.14572\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.14572","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,复杂的再照射和立体定向治疗引发了非共面治疗的使用,以获得更好的剂量一致性,这带来了机器与患者、沙发或固定装置之间碰撞的风险。为了确保计划的可交付性而不发生冲突,通常会执行耗时的操作,包括在计划期间的预演、室内沙发旋转和梁配置测试。为了克服这些挑战,开发了一种名为MapRT的新工具(VisionRT Ltd, London, UK)。MapRT根据患者的3D模型(通过CT模拟时的专用摄像机获得)和预先建立的机器模型预测清除图。这项工作使用Truebeam Linac (Varian, Palo Alto, USA)上30 × 35 × 40 cm3的幻影和64个龙门/沙发碰撞坐标来评估MapRT的准确性。记录龙门架和沙发旋转的碰撞坐标。对于MapRT中可定制的沙发/患者模型周围的不同缓冲边界,评估了真实碰撞坐标与MapRT预测的一致性。报告了MapRT首次临床应用的结果。在没有缓冲裕度的情况下,MapRT的预测和实验碰撞坐标的平均差异很小,但龙门(-0.5°±6.2°)和沙发(-0.1°±4.8°)碰撞坐标的标准差很大。当排除kV成像分量时,龙门的这些值为-0.8°±3.5°,沙发的这些值为0.4°±4.4°。最后,一个3厘米的缓冲余量允许MapRT 100%准确预测龙门架到幻影和龙门架到沙发的碰撞。在MapRT检查的900个治疗方案中,有22个方案可以避免碰撞,另有6个方案仍然发生了碰撞,但这主要是由于用户的疏忽。MapRT可以很容易地预测复杂治疗计划中的碰撞。这项工作证明了其可靠性使用3厘米缓冲余量。MapRT是一个很有前途的工具,可以提高安全性、节省时间和改进工作流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Benchmarking MapRT and first clinical experience: A novel solution for collision-free non-coplanar treatment planning

Benchmarking MapRT and first clinical experience: A novel solution for collision-free non-coplanar treatment planning

In recent years, complex re-irradiations and stereotactic treatments have triggered the use of non-coplanar treatments for better dose conformality, entailing risks of collision between the machine and the patient, couch, or immobilization device. To ensure the plans deliverability without collisions, time-consuming actions are typically performed, including dry runs, in-room couch rotations, and beam configuration tests during planning. To overcome these challenges, a new tool called MapRT (VisionRT Ltd., London, UK) was developed. MapRT predicts a clearance map based on a patients' 3D model (acquired with dedicated cameras at the CT simulation) and pre-established machine models. This work evaluates the accuracy of MapRT using a 30 × 35 × 40 cm3 phantom and 64 gantry/couch collision coordinates on a Truebeam Linac (Varian, Palo Alto, USA). Collision coordinates were recorded for gantry and couch rotations. The agreement of real collision coordinates and MapRT's predictions was evaluated for different buffer margins around the couch/patient models customizable in MapRT. Results of the first clinical implementation of MapRT were also reported. With no buffer margin, MapRT's predictions and experimental collision coordinates showed small average differences but with large standard deviations for gantry (-0.5°±6.2°) and couch (-0.1°±4.8°) collision coordinates. When excluding the kV imaging components, these values were of -0.8°±3.5° for gantry and 0.4°±4.4° for couch. Finally, a 3 cm buffer margin allows for 100% accurate predictions by MapRT of gantry-to-phantom and gantry-to-couch collisions. Among the ∼900 treatment plans checked with MapRT, 22 collisions could be avoided while another 6 plans still incurred a collision but these are mainly due to users' oversights. MapRT easily predict collisions in complex treatment planning. This work demonstrated its reliability using a 3 cm buffer margin. MapRT is a promising tool for increasing security, time saving and workflow improvement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信