负荷-强度比作为胃旁路与胃束带术后腕关节骨折的估计。

IF 3.4 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
JBMR Plus Pub Date : 2024-12-30 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1093/jbmrpl/ziae175
Grace H Jung, Bita Zahedi, Mary L Bouxsein, Elaine W Yu
{"title":"负荷-强度比作为胃旁路与胃束带术后腕关节骨折的估计。","authors":"Grace H Jung, Bita Zahedi, Mary L Bouxsein, Elaine W Yu","doi":"10.1093/jbmrpl/ziae175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bariatric surgeries such as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and adjustable gastric banding (AGB) lead to long-term deficits in bone density but are also accompanied by decreased weight, which may lower the impact force with falls. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term skeletal impact of RYGB and AGB using a biomechanical evaluation of load-to-strength ratio at the distal radius as a surrogate for wrist fracture risk. We conducted a cross-sectional study evaluating bone microarchitectural parameters and bone turnover in adults who received either RYGB or AGB surgery ≥10 yr ago (RYGB: <i>n</i> = 22; AGB: <i>n</i> = 23). Bone strength at the distal radius was estimated by microfinite element analysis from HR-pQCT. We used a single-spring biomechanical model to estimate impact force and then calculated load-to-strength ratio as a ratio of impact force to bone strength, with higher load-to-strength ratios representing a higher susceptibility to fracture. In multivariable analyses, the RYGB group had higher bone resorption marker C-telopeptide (CTX) levels, lower volumetric bone density, and worse cortical and trabecular microarchitectural parameters than the AGB group. Furthermore, estimated bone strength at the radius was lower in the RYGB group (3725 ± 139 N vs 4141 ± 157 N, <i>p</i> = .030), and the load-to-strength ratio was higher in RYGB group as compared with AGB (0.84 ± 0.04 vs 0.72 ± 0.05, <i>p</i> = .035), suggestive of higher propensity for wrist fracture. Taken together, these results indicate the long-term deleterious skeletal effects are more concerning with RYGB than AGB.</p>","PeriodicalId":14611,"journal":{"name":"JBMR Plus","volume":"9 3","pages":"ziae175"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11791783/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Load-to-strength ratio as an estimate of wrist facture after gastric bypass vs gastric banding.\",\"authors\":\"Grace H Jung, Bita Zahedi, Mary L Bouxsein, Elaine W Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbmrpl/ziae175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Bariatric surgeries such as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and adjustable gastric banding (AGB) lead to long-term deficits in bone density but are also accompanied by decreased weight, which may lower the impact force with falls. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term skeletal impact of RYGB and AGB using a biomechanical evaluation of load-to-strength ratio at the distal radius as a surrogate for wrist fracture risk. We conducted a cross-sectional study evaluating bone microarchitectural parameters and bone turnover in adults who received either RYGB or AGB surgery ≥10 yr ago (RYGB: <i>n</i> = 22; AGB: <i>n</i> = 23). Bone strength at the distal radius was estimated by microfinite element analysis from HR-pQCT. We used a single-spring biomechanical model to estimate impact force and then calculated load-to-strength ratio as a ratio of impact force to bone strength, with higher load-to-strength ratios representing a higher susceptibility to fracture. In multivariable analyses, the RYGB group had higher bone resorption marker C-telopeptide (CTX) levels, lower volumetric bone density, and worse cortical and trabecular microarchitectural parameters than the AGB group. Furthermore, estimated bone strength at the radius was lower in the RYGB group (3725 ± 139 N vs 4141 ± 157 N, <i>p</i> = .030), and the load-to-strength ratio was higher in RYGB group as compared with AGB (0.84 ± 0.04 vs 0.72 ± 0.05, <i>p</i> = .035), suggestive of higher propensity for wrist fracture. Taken together, these results indicate the long-term deleterious skeletal effects are more concerning with RYGB than AGB.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBMR Plus\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"ziae175\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11791783/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBMR Plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbmrpl/ziae175\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBMR Plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbmrpl/ziae175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术(RYGB)和可调节胃束带(AGB)等减肥手术会导致骨密度的长期不足,但也伴随着体重的下降,这可能会降低跌倒时的作用力。本研究的目的是比较RYGB和AGB对骨骼的长期影响,使用生物力学评估桡骨远端负荷强度比作为腕部骨折风险的替代指标。我们进行了一项横断面研究,评估≥10年前接受RYGB或AGB手术的成人骨微结构参数和骨转换(RYGB: n = 22;AGB: n = 23)。通过HR-pQCT的微有限元分析估计桡骨远端骨强度。我们使用单弹簧生物力学模型来估计冲击力,然后计算载荷强度比,即冲击力与骨强度之比,较高的载荷强度比代表较高的骨折易感性。在多变量分析中,RYGB组骨吸收标记物c -末端肽(CTX)水平较高,体积骨密度较低,皮质和小梁微结构参数较AGB组差。此外,RYGB组桡骨强度估计值较低(3725±139 N比4141±157 N, p = 0.030),与AGB组相比,RYGB组的负荷强度比更高(0.84±0.04比0.72±0.05,p = 0.035),提示腕部骨折倾向较高。综上所述,这些结果表明RYGB对骨骼的长期有害影响比AGB更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Load-to-strength ratio as an estimate of wrist facture after gastric bypass vs gastric banding.

Bariatric surgeries such as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and adjustable gastric banding (AGB) lead to long-term deficits in bone density but are also accompanied by decreased weight, which may lower the impact force with falls. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term skeletal impact of RYGB and AGB using a biomechanical evaluation of load-to-strength ratio at the distal radius as a surrogate for wrist fracture risk. We conducted a cross-sectional study evaluating bone microarchitectural parameters and bone turnover in adults who received either RYGB or AGB surgery ≥10 yr ago (RYGB: n = 22; AGB: n = 23). Bone strength at the distal radius was estimated by microfinite element analysis from HR-pQCT. We used a single-spring biomechanical model to estimate impact force and then calculated load-to-strength ratio as a ratio of impact force to bone strength, with higher load-to-strength ratios representing a higher susceptibility to fracture. In multivariable analyses, the RYGB group had higher bone resorption marker C-telopeptide (CTX) levels, lower volumetric bone density, and worse cortical and trabecular microarchitectural parameters than the AGB group. Furthermore, estimated bone strength at the radius was lower in the RYGB group (3725 ± 139 N vs 4141 ± 157 N, p = .030), and the load-to-strength ratio was higher in RYGB group as compared with AGB (0.84 ± 0.04 vs 0.72 ± 0.05, p = .035), suggestive of higher propensity for wrist fracture. Taken together, these results indicate the long-term deleterious skeletal effects are more concerning with RYGB than AGB.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JBMR Plus
JBMR Plus Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
103
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信