改良虚弱指数可预测基于植入物的即刻乳房再造术的效果。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Annals of Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000004249
Dora Danko, Makenna E Ash, Albert Losken, Peter W Thompson
{"title":"改良虚弱指数可预测基于植入物的即刻乳房再造术的效果。","authors":"Dora Danko, Makenna E Ash, Albert Losken, Peter W Thompson","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Risk stratification is a crucial tool to help in surgical planning and counseling. Historically, this has been measured by age, BMI, smoking status, or medical comorbidities. Frailty, the combined burden of the patient's comorbidities and risk factors, has gained traction as a method of combining disparate risk factors into one number. The modified 5-factor frailty index (mFI-5) is simple to calculate and takes only moments to assign a risk level to a patient.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to study the application and efficacy of the mFI-5 as a measurement of operative risk in immediate breast reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 650 patients undergoing breast reconstruction at our institution were identified. Patients were divided into 5 mFI-5 groups based on their associated comorbidities. Surgical outcomes were compared using the χ 2 or Fisher exact tests for categorical variables and t tests for continuous variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 452 patients stratified into the mFI-5 0 group, 155 patients into the mFI-5 1 group, 40 patients into the mFI-5 2 group, and 3 patients into the mFI-5 3 group. There were no patients in our cohort in either the mFI-5 4 or 5 groups. In comparison of the mFI-5 0 group to 1 group, there was a significant difference in postoperative day of infection (32.06 vs. 21.5 days. respectively; P = 0.049). When comparing to the mFI-5 2 group, there was a significant difference in overall complications on univariate analysis ( P = 0.012), minor infections on univariate and multivariate analysis ( P = 0.050 and P < 0.001), seroma formation on univariate analysis ( P = 0.017), hematoma formation ( P < 0.001), return to OR ( P < 0.001), and replaced implant ( P < 0.001) on multivariate analysis. When comparing the mFI-5 1 group to the mFI-5 2 group, there was a significant difference between overall complications on both univariate and multivariate analyses ( P = 0.012 and P = 0.041) and minor infections on univariate analysis ( P = 0.032).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The modified 5-factor frailty index is effective in predicting increased complication risks seen after IBR and may be helpful for surgeons when counseling patients and assessing overall operative risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"426-432"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Modified Frailty Index Predicts Outcomes in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Dora Danko, Makenna E Ash, Albert Losken, Peter W Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Risk stratification is a crucial tool to help in surgical planning and counseling. Historically, this has been measured by age, BMI, smoking status, or medical comorbidities. Frailty, the combined burden of the patient's comorbidities and risk factors, has gained traction as a method of combining disparate risk factors into one number. The modified 5-factor frailty index (mFI-5) is simple to calculate and takes only moments to assign a risk level to a patient.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to study the application and efficacy of the mFI-5 as a measurement of operative risk in immediate breast reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 650 patients undergoing breast reconstruction at our institution were identified. Patients were divided into 5 mFI-5 groups based on their associated comorbidities. Surgical outcomes were compared using the χ 2 or Fisher exact tests for categorical variables and t tests for continuous variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 452 patients stratified into the mFI-5 0 group, 155 patients into the mFI-5 1 group, 40 patients into the mFI-5 2 group, and 3 patients into the mFI-5 3 group. There were no patients in our cohort in either the mFI-5 4 or 5 groups. In comparison of the mFI-5 0 group to 1 group, there was a significant difference in postoperative day of infection (32.06 vs. 21.5 days. respectively; P = 0.049). When comparing to the mFI-5 2 group, there was a significant difference in overall complications on univariate analysis ( P = 0.012), minor infections on univariate and multivariate analysis ( P = 0.050 and P < 0.001), seroma formation on univariate analysis ( P = 0.017), hematoma formation ( P < 0.001), return to OR ( P < 0.001), and replaced implant ( P < 0.001) on multivariate analysis. When comparing the mFI-5 1 group to the mFI-5 2 group, there was a significant difference between overall complications on both univariate and multivariate analyses ( P = 0.012 and P = 0.041) and minor infections on univariate analysis ( P = 0.032).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The modified 5-factor frailty index is effective in predicting increased complication risks seen after IBR and may be helpful for surgeons when counseling patients and assessing overall operative risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"426-432\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004249\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004249","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:风险分层是帮助进行手术规划和咨询的重要工具。一直以来,风险分层都是通过年龄、体重指数、吸烟状况或合并症来衡量的。虚弱是指患者合并症和风险因素的综合负担,作为一种将不同风险因素合并为一个数字的方法,它已获得广泛关注。改良的 5 因子虚弱指数(mFI-5)计算简单,只需片刻就能为患者确定一个风险等级:本研究旨在研究 mFI-5 作为即刻乳房重建手术风险测量方法的应用和有效性:方法:共确定了 650 名在我院接受乳房再造手术的患者。根据患者的相关并发症将其分为 5 个 mFI-5 组。对分类变量采用χ2检验或费雪精确检验,对连续变量采用t检验,比较手术结果:452 名患者被分为 mFI-5 0 组,155 名患者被分为 mFI-5 1 组,40 名患者被分为 mFI-5 2 组,3 名患者被分为 mFI-5 3 组。我们的队列中没有 mFI-5 4 或 5 组的患者。mFI-5 0 组与 mFI-5 1 组相比,术后感染天数有显著差异(分别为 32.06 天和 21.5 天;P = 0.049)。与 mFI-5 2 组相比,单变量分析的总体并发症(P = 0.012)、单变量和多变量分析的轻微感染(P = 0.050 和 P <0.001)、单变量分析的血清肿形成(P = 0.017)、血肿形成(P <0.001)、返回手术室(P <0.001)和多变量分析的植入物更换(P <0.001)均有显著差异。将 mFI-5 1 组与 mFI-5 2 组进行比较时,单变量和多变量分析中的总体并发症(P = 0.012 和 P = 0.041)与单变量分析中的轻微感染(P = 0.032)之间存在显著差异:改良的 5 因子虚弱指数能有效预测 IBR 术后并发症风险的增加,可能有助于外科医生为患者提供咨询并评估整体手术风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Modified Frailty Index Predicts Outcomes in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.

Background: Risk stratification is a crucial tool to help in surgical planning and counseling. Historically, this has been measured by age, BMI, smoking status, or medical comorbidities. Frailty, the combined burden of the patient's comorbidities and risk factors, has gained traction as a method of combining disparate risk factors into one number. The modified 5-factor frailty index (mFI-5) is simple to calculate and takes only moments to assign a risk level to a patient.

Objectives: This study aimed to study the application and efficacy of the mFI-5 as a measurement of operative risk in immediate breast reconstruction.

Methods: A total of 650 patients undergoing breast reconstruction at our institution were identified. Patients were divided into 5 mFI-5 groups based on their associated comorbidities. Surgical outcomes were compared using the χ 2 or Fisher exact tests for categorical variables and t tests for continuous variables.

Results: There were 452 patients stratified into the mFI-5 0 group, 155 patients into the mFI-5 1 group, 40 patients into the mFI-5 2 group, and 3 patients into the mFI-5 3 group. There were no patients in our cohort in either the mFI-5 4 or 5 groups. In comparison of the mFI-5 0 group to 1 group, there was a significant difference in postoperative day of infection (32.06 vs. 21.5 days. respectively; P = 0.049). When comparing to the mFI-5 2 group, there was a significant difference in overall complications on univariate analysis ( P = 0.012), minor infections on univariate and multivariate analysis ( P = 0.050 and P < 0.001), seroma formation on univariate analysis ( P = 0.017), hematoma formation ( P < 0.001), return to OR ( P < 0.001), and replaced implant ( P < 0.001) on multivariate analysis. When comparing the mFI-5 1 group to the mFI-5 2 group, there was a significant difference between overall complications on both univariate and multivariate analyses ( P = 0.012 and P = 0.041) and minor infections on univariate analysis ( P = 0.032).

Conclusions: The modified 5-factor frailty index is effective in predicting increased complication risks seen after IBR and may be helpful for surgeons when counseling patients and assessing overall operative risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信