用于儿童牙科的近端间图像受体保持装置原型的开发和评估。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Thais Ocampo, Caio Alencar-Palha, Deivi Cascante-Sequeira, Marcela Tarosso Réa, Deborah Queiroz Freitas, Francisco Haiter-Neto
{"title":"用于儿童牙科的近端间图像受体保持装置原型的开发和评估。","authors":"Thais Ocampo, Caio Alencar-Palha, Deivi Cascante-Sequeira, Marcela Tarosso Réa, Deborah Queiroz Freitas, Francisco Haiter-Neto","doi":"10.1093/dmfr/twaf009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To develop and test a prototype for interproximal radiography positioning intended for paediatric dentistry and compare the technical quality of image receptor-holding devices (IRHDs) commonly used in clinical practice. Six prototypes, with 3 wedge dimensions (0.5, 1, and 2 mm, respectively) in upper and lower positions on the bitewing surface were compared regarding their capacity to acquire interproximal radiographs without overlapping surfaces with other IRHDs: RinnXCP, Hawe Kerr, and Cone Indicator. Fifteen graduate students obtained images of deciduous molars in a child's skull and mandible. The chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were employed to analyse significant differences in the number of repetitions and failures in obtaining correct images. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) assessed the difference between the mean times required for image acquisition according to each IRHD, adopting a significance level of 5%. The effectiveness of the tested devices, evaluated by the number of correct and incorrect acquisitions using Fisher's exact test, revealed a P-value of .057. The ANOVA demonstrated statistically significant differences in the mean acquisition times (P < .0000). The upper and lower wedge prototypes 2 mm performed better in acquiring only 1 radiograph (76.7%) and took less time to execute the technique (1.17 and 1.12 min, respectively). The prototypes showed comparable performance to alternative IRHDs but provided advantages in time efficiency and radiation exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":" ","pages":"396-403"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and assessment of a prototype of an interproximal image receptor-holding device for use in paediatric dentistry.\",\"authors\":\"Thais Ocampo, Caio Alencar-Palha, Deivi Cascante-Sequeira, Marcela Tarosso Réa, Deborah Queiroz Freitas, Francisco Haiter-Neto\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/dmfr/twaf009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To develop and test a prototype for interproximal radiography positioning intended for paediatric dentistry and compare the technical quality of image receptor-holding devices (IRHDs) commonly used in clinical practice. Six prototypes, with 3 wedge dimensions (0.5, 1, and 2 mm, respectively) in upper and lower positions on the bitewing surface were compared regarding their capacity to acquire interproximal radiographs without overlapping surfaces with other IRHDs: RinnXCP, Hawe Kerr, and Cone Indicator. Fifteen graduate students obtained images of deciduous molars in a child's skull and mandible. The chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were employed to analyse significant differences in the number of repetitions and failures in obtaining correct images. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) assessed the difference between the mean times required for image acquisition according to each IRHD, adopting a significance level of 5%. The effectiveness of the tested devices, evaluated by the number of correct and incorrect acquisitions using Fisher's exact test, revealed a P-value of .057. The ANOVA demonstrated statistically significant differences in the mean acquisition times (P < .0000). The upper and lower wedge prototypes 2 mm performed better in acquiring only 1 radiograph (76.7%) and took less time to execute the technique (1.17 and 1.12 min, respectively). The prototypes showed comparable performance to alternative IRHDs but provided advantages in time efficiency and radiation exposure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dento maxillo facial radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"396-403\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dento maxillo facial radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twaf009\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twaf009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:开发和测试一种用于儿童牙科近端间放射成像定位的原型,并比较临床常用的图像受体保持装置(IRHD)的技术质量。方法:在咬翼表面的上、下位置分别设置三种楔形尺寸(0.5 mm、1 mm和2 mm)的6个原型机与其他irhd (RinnXCPTM、Hawe KerrTM和Cone Indicator)进行比较,比较它们获取近端间x线片的能力。15名研究生获得了儿童颅骨和下颌骨乳牙的图像。采用卡方检验和Fisher精确检验来分析重复次数和获得正确图像失败的显著差异。单因素方差分析评估了每个IRHD图像采集所需的平均时间之间的差异,采用5%的显著性水平。结果:测试设备的有效性,通过使用Fisher精确测试的正确和不正确获取的数量来评估,显示p值为0.057。方差分析显示,在平均采集时间上存在统计学上的显著差异(p)。结论:样机的性能与其他irhd相当,但在时间效率和辐射暴露方面具有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and assessment of a prototype of an interproximal image receptor-holding device for use in paediatric dentistry.

To develop and test a prototype for interproximal radiography positioning intended for paediatric dentistry and compare the technical quality of image receptor-holding devices (IRHDs) commonly used in clinical practice. Six prototypes, with 3 wedge dimensions (0.5, 1, and 2 mm, respectively) in upper and lower positions on the bitewing surface were compared regarding their capacity to acquire interproximal radiographs without overlapping surfaces with other IRHDs: RinnXCP, Hawe Kerr, and Cone Indicator. Fifteen graduate students obtained images of deciduous molars in a child's skull and mandible. The chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were employed to analyse significant differences in the number of repetitions and failures in obtaining correct images. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) assessed the difference between the mean times required for image acquisition according to each IRHD, adopting a significance level of 5%. The effectiveness of the tested devices, evaluated by the number of correct and incorrect acquisitions using Fisher's exact test, revealed a P-value of .057. The ANOVA demonstrated statistically significant differences in the mean acquisition times (P < .0000). The upper and lower wedge prototypes 2 mm performed better in acquiring only 1 radiograph (76.7%) and took less time to execute the technique (1.17 and 1.12 min, respectively). The prototypes showed comparable performance to alternative IRHDs but provided advantages in time efficiency and radiation exposure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
65
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging. Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology. The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919 - Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks - Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks - Open access option - ISSN: 0250-832X - eISSN: 1476-542X
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信