澳大利亚昆士兰州的小学校长和教师支持学校提供膳食:一项横断面研究的简要报告

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Emma K. Esdaile, Lee Wharton, Helen A. Vidgen, Danielle Gallegos
{"title":"澳大利亚昆士兰州的小学校长和教师支持学校提供膳食:一项横断面研究的简要报告","authors":"Emma K. Esdaile,&nbsp;Lee Wharton,&nbsp;Helen A. Vidgen,&nbsp;Danielle Gallegos","doi":"10.1002/hpja.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Issues Addressed</h3>\n \n <p>This research aimed to describe the level of support for school-provided meals (SPMs) among primary school teachers and principals in Queensland, Australia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Secondary analysis from two surveys undertaken in 2022 to explore food and nutrition education, environments and resources in Queensland primary schools. Teachers were asked two questions, (1) if they thought a school-provided breakfast or lunch would benefit the students at their school; and (2) if they have provided food for a student who has come to school hungry in the last month. Principals were asked if they thought school-provided meals would benefit their students and reasons why. Data were analysed using descriptive statistical and thematic analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In total 278 teachers/principals responded, predominantly from public schools. Teachers (<i>n</i> = 139) were more likely to come from larger, more socially advantaged urban schools and principals (<i>n</i> = 139) from smaller, more socially disadvantaged regional schools. More than 7 out of 10 teachers supported a school-provided breakfast (72%) or lunch (71%) program, and just over half (70, 50.4%) had provided food for hungry students in the preceding month. Two-thirds of principals supported SPMs (66%). Student wellbeing and tension with parents were key themes for support or opposition to SPMs among principals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Principal and teacher respondents from primary schools in diverse geographic and socioeconomic locations within Queensland showed high support for SPMs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47379,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","volume":"36 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hpja.70015","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Primary School Principals and Teachers Support School-Provided Meals in Queensland, Australia: Brief Report of a Cross-Sectional Study\",\"authors\":\"Emma K. Esdaile,&nbsp;Lee Wharton,&nbsp;Helen A. Vidgen,&nbsp;Danielle Gallegos\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hpja.70015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Issues Addressed</h3>\\n \\n <p>This research aimed to describe the level of support for school-provided meals (SPMs) among primary school teachers and principals in Queensland, Australia.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Secondary analysis from two surveys undertaken in 2022 to explore food and nutrition education, environments and resources in Queensland primary schools. Teachers were asked two questions, (1) if they thought a school-provided breakfast or lunch would benefit the students at their school; and (2) if they have provided food for a student who has come to school hungry in the last month. Principals were asked if they thought school-provided meals would benefit their students and reasons why. Data were analysed using descriptive statistical and thematic analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In total 278 teachers/principals responded, predominantly from public schools. Teachers (<i>n</i> = 139) were more likely to come from larger, more socially advantaged urban schools and principals (<i>n</i> = 139) from smaller, more socially disadvantaged regional schools. More than 7 out of 10 teachers supported a school-provided breakfast (72%) or lunch (71%) program, and just over half (70, 50.4%) had provided food for hungry students in the preceding month. Two-thirds of principals supported SPMs (66%). Student wellbeing and tension with parents were key themes for support or opposition to SPMs among principals.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Principal and teacher respondents from primary schools in diverse geographic and socioeconomic locations within Queensland showed high support for SPMs.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Promotion Journal of Australia\",\"volume\":\"36 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hpja.70015\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Promotion Journal of Australia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hpja.70015\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hpja.70015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在描述澳大利亚昆士兰州小学教师和校长对学校提供膳食(SPMs)的支持程度。方法对2022年进行的两次调查进行二次分析,对昆士兰州小学的食物与营养教育、环境和资源进行调查。教师们被问及两个问题,(1)他们是否认为学校提供的早餐或午餐会使他们学校的学生受益;(2)是否为上个月饿着肚子来学校的学生提供过食物。校长们被问及他们是否认为学校提供的伙食对他们的学生有益以及原因。数据分析采用描述性统计和专题分析。结果共有278名教师/校长回应,主要来自公立学校。教师(n = 139)更有可能来自规模更大、社会地位更有利的城市学校,校长(n = 139)更有可能来自规模更小、社会地位更不利的地区学校。超过70%的教师支持学校提供早餐(72%)或午餐(71%)计划,超过一半(7050.4%)的教师在前一个月为饥饿的学生提供食物。三分之二的校长支持spm(66%)。学生的福祉和与家长的紧张关系是校长支持或反对spm的关键主题。结论来自昆士兰州不同地理和社会经济位置的小学校长和教师受访者对策略管理的支持度很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Primary School Principals and Teachers Support School-Provided Meals in Queensland, Australia: Brief Report of a Cross-Sectional Study

Issues Addressed

This research aimed to describe the level of support for school-provided meals (SPMs) among primary school teachers and principals in Queensland, Australia.

Methods

Secondary analysis from two surveys undertaken in 2022 to explore food and nutrition education, environments and resources in Queensland primary schools. Teachers were asked two questions, (1) if they thought a school-provided breakfast or lunch would benefit the students at their school; and (2) if they have provided food for a student who has come to school hungry in the last month. Principals were asked if they thought school-provided meals would benefit their students and reasons why. Data were analysed using descriptive statistical and thematic analysis.

Results

In total 278 teachers/principals responded, predominantly from public schools. Teachers (n = 139) were more likely to come from larger, more socially advantaged urban schools and principals (n = 139) from smaller, more socially disadvantaged regional schools. More than 7 out of 10 teachers supported a school-provided breakfast (72%) or lunch (71%) program, and just over half (70, 50.4%) had provided food for hungry students in the preceding month. Two-thirds of principals supported SPMs (66%). Student wellbeing and tension with parents were key themes for support or opposition to SPMs among principals.

Conclusions

Principal and teacher respondents from primary schools in diverse geographic and socioeconomic locations within Queensland showed high support for SPMs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Promotion Journal of Australia
Health Promotion Journal of Australia PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
115
期刊介绍: The purpose of the Health Promotion Journal of Australia is to facilitate communication between researchers, practitioners, and policymakers involved in health promotion activities. Preference for publication is given to practical examples of policies, theories, strategies and programs which utilise educational, organisational, economic and/or environmental approaches to health promotion. The journal also publishes brief reports discussing programs, professional viewpoints, and guidelines for practice or evaluation methodology. The journal features articles, brief reports, editorials, perspectives, "of interest", viewpoints, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信