Emma K. Esdaile, Lee Wharton, Helen A. Vidgen, Danielle Gallegos
{"title":"澳大利亚昆士兰州的小学校长和教师支持学校提供膳食:一项横断面研究的简要报告","authors":"Emma K. Esdaile, Lee Wharton, Helen A. Vidgen, Danielle Gallegos","doi":"10.1002/hpja.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Issues Addressed</h3>\n \n <p>This research aimed to describe the level of support for school-provided meals (SPMs) among primary school teachers and principals in Queensland, Australia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Secondary analysis from two surveys undertaken in 2022 to explore food and nutrition education, environments and resources in Queensland primary schools. Teachers were asked two questions, (1) if they thought a school-provided breakfast or lunch would benefit the students at their school; and (2) if they have provided food for a student who has come to school hungry in the last month. Principals were asked if they thought school-provided meals would benefit their students and reasons why. Data were analysed using descriptive statistical and thematic analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In total 278 teachers/principals responded, predominantly from public schools. Teachers (<i>n</i> = 139) were more likely to come from larger, more socially advantaged urban schools and principals (<i>n</i> = 139) from smaller, more socially disadvantaged regional schools. More than 7 out of 10 teachers supported a school-provided breakfast (72%) or lunch (71%) program, and just over half (70, 50.4%) had provided food for hungry students in the preceding month. Two-thirds of principals supported SPMs (66%). Student wellbeing and tension with parents were key themes for support or opposition to SPMs among principals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Principal and teacher respondents from primary schools in diverse geographic and socioeconomic locations within Queensland showed high support for SPMs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47379,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","volume":"36 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hpja.70015","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Primary School Principals and Teachers Support School-Provided Meals in Queensland, Australia: Brief Report of a Cross-Sectional Study\",\"authors\":\"Emma K. Esdaile, Lee Wharton, Helen A. Vidgen, Danielle Gallegos\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hpja.70015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Issues Addressed</h3>\\n \\n <p>This research aimed to describe the level of support for school-provided meals (SPMs) among primary school teachers and principals in Queensland, Australia.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Secondary analysis from two surveys undertaken in 2022 to explore food and nutrition education, environments and resources in Queensland primary schools. Teachers were asked two questions, (1) if they thought a school-provided breakfast or lunch would benefit the students at their school; and (2) if they have provided food for a student who has come to school hungry in the last month. Principals were asked if they thought school-provided meals would benefit their students and reasons why. Data were analysed using descriptive statistical and thematic analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In total 278 teachers/principals responded, predominantly from public schools. Teachers (<i>n</i> = 139) were more likely to come from larger, more socially advantaged urban schools and principals (<i>n</i> = 139) from smaller, more socially disadvantaged regional schools. More than 7 out of 10 teachers supported a school-provided breakfast (72%) or lunch (71%) program, and just over half (70, 50.4%) had provided food for hungry students in the preceding month. Two-thirds of principals supported SPMs (66%). Student wellbeing and tension with parents were key themes for support or opposition to SPMs among principals.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Principal and teacher respondents from primary schools in diverse geographic and socioeconomic locations within Queensland showed high support for SPMs.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Promotion Journal of Australia\",\"volume\":\"36 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hpja.70015\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Promotion Journal of Australia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hpja.70015\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hpja.70015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Primary School Principals and Teachers Support School-Provided Meals in Queensland, Australia: Brief Report of a Cross-Sectional Study
Issues Addressed
This research aimed to describe the level of support for school-provided meals (SPMs) among primary school teachers and principals in Queensland, Australia.
Methods
Secondary analysis from two surveys undertaken in 2022 to explore food and nutrition education, environments and resources in Queensland primary schools. Teachers were asked two questions, (1) if they thought a school-provided breakfast or lunch would benefit the students at their school; and (2) if they have provided food for a student who has come to school hungry in the last month. Principals were asked if they thought school-provided meals would benefit their students and reasons why. Data were analysed using descriptive statistical and thematic analysis.
Results
In total 278 teachers/principals responded, predominantly from public schools. Teachers (n = 139) were more likely to come from larger, more socially advantaged urban schools and principals (n = 139) from smaller, more socially disadvantaged regional schools. More than 7 out of 10 teachers supported a school-provided breakfast (72%) or lunch (71%) program, and just over half (70, 50.4%) had provided food for hungry students in the preceding month. Two-thirds of principals supported SPMs (66%). Student wellbeing and tension with parents were key themes for support or opposition to SPMs among principals.
Conclusions
Principal and teacher respondents from primary schools in diverse geographic and socioeconomic locations within Queensland showed high support for SPMs.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of the Health Promotion Journal of Australia is to facilitate communication between researchers, practitioners, and policymakers involved in health promotion activities. Preference for publication is given to practical examples of policies, theories, strategies and programs which utilise educational, organisational, economic and/or environmental approaches to health promotion. The journal also publishes brief reports discussing programs, professional viewpoints, and guidelines for practice or evaluation methodology. The journal features articles, brief reports, editorials, perspectives, "of interest", viewpoints, book reviews and letters.