实验室安全风险认知量表:开发与验证

IF 2.5 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Chaohui Lin , Kangsheng Zheng , Siu Shing Man
{"title":"实验室安全风险认知量表:开发与验证","authors":"Chaohui Lin ,&nbsp;Kangsheng Zheng ,&nbsp;Siu Shing Man","doi":"10.1016/j.ergon.2024.103689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous studies on risk perception (RP) related to laboratory safety have not fully considered the affective aspect of RP and lacked a comprehensive validation of reliability and validity. Accordingly, the present study addresses the needs of this research area with the development of a psychometrically reliable instrument for assessing laboratory workers' RP, namely, Risk Perception Scale for Laboratory Safety (RPSLS). Five hundred eighteen volunteer laboratory workers participated in the questionnaire survey. RPSLS consists of 24 items, with Cronbach's alpha values ranging from 0.945 to 0.953 and the intra-class correlation coefficient exceeding 0.9. Additionally, factor loadings and the average variance extracted (AVE) were above 0.70 and 0.5, respectively. The AVE square roots for four factors were above the construct correlations. These results demonstrated satisfactory reliability and discriminant and convergent validity, while acknowledging the moderate criterion-related validity. RPSLS was designed to measure four dimensions of RP: probability, severity, concern and unsafety. Negative correlations were found between the dimensions and laboratory workers engaging in risk-taking behaviour. RPSLS, as a reliable and valid tool, was established to evaluate laboratory workers' RP and is anticipated to support research on laboratory safety that considers workers' RP. RPSLS can be utilised as an assessment tool to identify laboratory workers likely to underestimate risks in hazardous experimental conditions. This insight can guide the development of targeted safety training programs, minimising unnecessary training effort and enhancing overall laboratory safety outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50317,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 103689"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk perception scale for laboratory safety: Development and validation\",\"authors\":\"Chaohui Lin ,&nbsp;Kangsheng Zheng ,&nbsp;Siu Shing Man\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ergon.2024.103689\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Previous studies on risk perception (RP) related to laboratory safety have not fully considered the affective aspect of RP and lacked a comprehensive validation of reliability and validity. Accordingly, the present study addresses the needs of this research area with the development of a psychometrically reliable instrument for assessing laboratory workers' RP, namely, Risk Perception Scale for Laboratory Safety (RPSLS). Five hundred eighteen volunteer laboratory workers participated in the questionnaire survey. RPSLS consists of 24 items, with Cronbach's alpha values ranging from 0.945 to 0.953 and the intra-class correlation coefficient exceeding 0.9. Additionally, factor loadings and the average variance extracted (AVE) were above 0.70 and 0.5, respectively. The AVE square roots for four factors were above the construct correlations. These results demonstrated satisfactory reliability and discriminant and convergent validity, while acknowledging the moderate criterion-related validity. RPSLS was designed to measure four dimensions of RP: probability, severity, concern and unsafety. Negative correlations were found between the dimensions and laboratory workers engaging in risk-taking behaviour. RPSLS, as a reliable and valid tool, was established to evaluate laboratory workers' RP and is anticipated to support research on laboratory safety that considers workers' RP. RPSLS can be utilised as an assessment tool to identify laboratory workers likely to underestimate risks in hazardous experimental conditions. This insight can guide the development of targeted safety training programs, minimising unnecessary training effort and enhancing overall laboratory safety outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\"105 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103689\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814124001458\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814124001458","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以往对实验室安全相关的风险感知(RP)的研究没有充分考虑RP的情感方面,缺乏全面的信效度验证。因此,本研究针对这一研究领域的需求,开发了一种心理测量学上可靠的工具来评估实验室工作人员的RP,即实验室安全风险感知量表(RPSLS)。518名实验室志愿者参与了问卷调查。RPSLS由24个条目组成,Cronbach’s alpha值在0.945 ~ 0.953之间,类内相关系数超过0.9。此外,因子负荷和平均方差提取(AVE)分别大于0.70和0.5。四个因素的AVE平方根均高于结构相关性。这些结果显示了令人满意的信度和判别效度和收敛效度,但承认适度的标准相关效度。RPSLS设计用于测量RP的四个维度:概率、严重性、关注和不安全性。这些维度与实验室工作人员从事冒险行为之间存在负相关。RPSLS作为一种可靠有效的工具,用于评估实验室工作人员的RP,并有望支持考虑工作人员RP的实验室安全研究。RPSLS可用作一种评估工具,以确定在危险实验条件下可能低估风险的实验室工作人员。这种洞察力可以指导有针对性的安全培训计划的发展,最大限度地减少不必要的培训工作,并提高整体实验室安全成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk perception scale for laboratory safety: Development and validation
Previous studies on risk perception (RP) related to laboratory safety have not fully considered the affective aspect of RP and lacked a comprehensive validation of reliability and validity. Accordingly, the present study addresses the needs of this research area with the development of a psychometrically reliable instrument for assessing laboratory workers' RP, namely, Risk Perception Scale for Laboratory Safety (RPSLS). Five hundred eighteen volunteer laboratory workers participated in the questionnaire survey. RPSLS consists of 24 items, with Cronbach's alpha values ranging from 0.945 to 0.953 and the intra-class correlation coefficient exceeding 0.9. Additionally, factor loadings and the average variance extracted (AVE) were above 0.70 and 0.5, respectively. The AVE square roots for four factors were above the construct correlations. These results demonstrated satisfactory reliability and discriminant and convergent validity, while acknowledging the moderate criterion-related validity. RPSLS was designed to measure four dimensions of RP: probability, severity, concern and unsafety. Negative correlations were found between the dimensions and laboratory workers engaging in risk-taking behaviour. RPSLS, as a reliable and valid tool, was established to evaluate laboratory workers' RP and is anticipated to support research on laboratory safety that considers workers' RP. RPSLS can be utilised as an assessment tool to identify laboratory workers likely to underestimate risks in hazardous experimental conditions. This insight can guide the development of targeted safety training programs, minimising unnecessary training effort and enhancing overall laboratory safety outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.90%
发文量
110
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions that add to our understanding of the role of humans in today systems and the interactions thereof with various system components. The journal typically covers the following areas: industrial and occupational ergonomics, design of systems, tools and equipment, human performance measurement and modeling, human productivity, humans in technologically complex systems, and safety. The focus of the articles includes basic theoretical advances, applications, case studies, new methodologies and procedures; and empirical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信