跨学科知识领域出现的驱动因素:为合成生命科学案例建立合法性的行为者层面视角

IF 10.9 1区 管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Chad M. Baum , Nathalie Sick , Stefanie Bröring
{"title":"跨学科知识领域出现的驱动因素:为合成生命科学案例建立合法性的行为者层面视角","authors":"Chad M. Baum ,&nbsp;Nathalie Sick ,&nbsp;Stefanie Bröring","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>No one discipline or knowledge area can spur the rise of novel technologies and solutions pivotal to mitigate the grand challenges confronting society. Such solutions increasingly require broad-based collaborations, new spaces for knowledge creation, and the emergence of interdisciplinary knowledge areas (IKAs). Little is known about the drivers for IKA emergence, specifically how their legitimacy can be built. Drawing on knowledge of emerging innovation ecosystems, we conceive legitimacy in terms of the need to align the views, skills, and motivations of diverse actors – between academia and industry and across disciplines as well. This exploratory study employs the mixed-methods approach of group concept mapping to examine drivers of new IKAs and specifically how legitimacy can be fostered from an actor-level perspective. This approach entails a series of steps whereby discussion is facilitated around a focus prompt, ideas are generated, the resulting statements are sorted (by participants) into categories and rated (for importance and changeability), and then analyzed and described using visual outputs. Employing synthetic life sciences as a case, an actor-based perspective is first provided of the drivers seen as most important and changeable, and how this varies by type of actor. We thereby elucidate initiatives promoting the emergence of IKAs, by stressing the importance of key actors or engaging with public concerns. Second, by examining similarities across actors, areas of consensus are highlighted, outlining a guiding vision to align their interests and goals. Third, by examining universities as a form of interdisciplinary invention ecosystem, we illustrate how universities are meaningful not only as a locus for groundbreaking research but a space where actors can collaborate for knowledge creation and exchange. Engaging universities through this lens, we finally provide a discussion of initiatives (outlined as propositions) that can promote the establishment of invention ecosystems, particularly around legitimacy-building by promoting broad-based collaboration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":"141 ","pages":"Article 103173"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drivers for the emergence of interdisciplinary knowledge areas: An actor-level perspective on building legitimacy for the case of synthetic life sciences\",\"authors\":\"Chad M. Baum ,&nbsp;Nathalie Sick ,&nbsp;Stefanie Bröring\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>No one discipline or knowledge area can spur the rise of novel technologies and solutions pivotal to mitigate the grand challenges confronting society. Such solutions increasingly require broad-based collaborations, new spaces for knowledge creation, and the emergence of interdisciplinary knowledge areas (IKAs). Little is known about the drivers for IKA emergence, specifically how their legitimacy can be built. Drawing on knowledge of emerging innovation ecosystems, we conceive legitimacy in terms of the need to align the views, skills, and motivations of diverse actors – between academia and industry and across disciplines as well. This exploratory study employs the mixed-methods approach of group concept mapping to examine drivers of new IKAs and specifically how legitimacy can be fostered from an actor-level perspective. This approach entails a series of steps whereby discussion is facilitated around a focus prompt, ideas are generated, the resulting statements are sorted (by participants) into categories and rated (for importance and changeability), and then analyzed and described using visual outputs. Employing synthetic life sciences as a case, an actor-based perspective is first provided of the drivers seen as most important and changeable, and how this varies by type of actor. We thereby elucidate initiatives promoting the emergence of IKAs, by stressing the importance of key actors or engaging with public concerns. Second, by examining similarities across actors, areas of consensus are highlighted, outlining a guiding vision to align their interests and goals. Third, by examining universities as a form of interdisciplinary invention ecosystem, we illustrate how universities are meaningful not only as a locus for groundbreaking research but a space where actors can collaborate for knowledge creation and exchange. Engaging universities through this lens, we finally provide a discussion of initiatives (outlined as propositions) that can promote the establishment of invention ecosystems, particularly around legitimacy-building by promoting broad-based collaboration.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technovation\",\"volume\":\"141 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497225000057\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497225000057","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

没有一个学科或知识领域能够刺激新技术和解决方案的兴起,这些新技术和解决方案对缓解社会面临的重大挑战至关重要。这种解决方案越来越需要广泛的合作、知识创造的新空间以及跨学科知识领域(ika)的出现。人们对IKA出现的驱动因素知之甚少,特别是如何建立其合法性。根据新兴创新生态系统的知识,我们认为需要在学术界和工业界以及跨学科之间协调不同参与者的观点、技能和动机,从而实现合法性。本探索性研究采用群体概念映射的混合方法来检查新IKAs的驱动因素,特别是如何从行为者层面的角度培养合法性。这种方法需要一系列步骤,通过这些步骤,围绕焦点提示进行讨论,产生想法,将结果陈述(由参与者)分类并评级(根据重要性和可变性),然后使用视觉输出进行分析和描述。以合成生命科学为例,基于行动者的视角首先提供了最重要和最可变的驱动因素,以及这如何随行动者的类型而变化。因此,我们通过强调关键行为者的重要性或与公众关注的问题接触,阐明了促进机构间机构出现的举措。其次,通过检查参与者之间的相似之处,突出了共识领域,概述了一个指导愿景,以协调他们的利益和目标。第三,通过考察大学作为一种跨学科发明生态系统的形式,我们说明了大学不仅是开创性研究的场所,而且是参与者可以合作进行知识创造和交流的空间。通过这一视角吸引大学,我们最终提供了一个倡议(概述为命题)的讨论,这些倡议可以促进发明生态系统的建立,特别是通过促进广泛的合作来建立合法性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Drivers for the emergence of interdisciplinary knowledge areas: An actor-level perspective on building legitimacy for the case of synthetic life sciences
No one discipline or knowledge area can spur the rise of novel technologies and solutions pivotal to mitigate the grand challenges confronting society. Such solutions increasingly require broad-based collaborations, new spaces for knowledge creation, and the emergence of interdisciplinary knowledge areas (IKAs). Little is known about the drivers for IKA emergence, specifically how their legitimacy can be built. Drawing on knowledge of emerging innovation ecosystems, we conceive legitimacy in terms of the need to align the views, skills, and motivations of diverse actors – between academia and industry and across disciplines as well. This exploratory study employs the mixed-methods approach of group concept mapping to examine drivers of new IKAs and specifically how legitimacy can be fostered from an actor-level perspective. This approach entails a series of steps whereby discussion is facilitated around a focus prompt, ideas are generated, the resulting statements are sorted (by participants) into categories and rated (for importance and changeability), and then analyzed and described using visual outputs. Employing synthetic life sciences as a case, an actor-based perspective is first provided of the drivers seen as most important and changeable, and how this varies by type of actor. We thereby elucidate initiatives promoting the emergence of IKAs, by stressing the importance of key actors or engaging with public concerns. Second, by examining similarities across actors, areas of consensus are highlighted, outlining a guiding vision to align their interests and goals. Third, by examining universities as a form of interdisciplinary invention ecosystem, we illustrate how universities are meaningful not only as a locus for groundbreaking research but a space where actors can collaborate for knowledge creation and exchange. Engaging universities through this lens, we finally provide a discussion of initiatives (outlined as propositions) that can promote the establishment of invention ecosystems, particularly around legitimacy-building by promoting broad-based collaboration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Technovation
Technovation 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
11.20%
发文量
208
审稿时长
91 days
期刊介绍: The interdisciplinary journal Technovation covers various aspects of technological innovation, exploring processes, products, and social impacts. It examines innovation in both process and product realms, including social innovations like regulatory frameworks and non-economic benefits. Topics range from emerging trends and capital for development to managing technology-intensive ventures and innovation in organizations of different sizes. It also discusses organizational structures, investment strategies for science and technology enterprises, and the roles of technological innovators. Additionally, it addresses technology transfer between developing countries and innovation across enterprise, political, and economic systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信