重新思考作为软组织肉瘤预后因素的肿瘤存活率

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Julien Montreuil , Eric Kholodovsky , Moses Markowitz , Sergio Torralbas Fitz , Dominic Campano , J. Erik Geiger , Francis Hornicek , Brooke Crawford , H. Thomas Temple
{"title":"重新思考作为软组织肉瘤预后因素的肿瘤存活率","authors":"Julien Montreuil ,&nbsp;Eric Kholodovsky ,&nbsp;Moses Markowitz ,&nbsp;Sergio Torralbas Fitz ,&nbsp;Dominic Campano ,&nbsp;J. Erik Geiger ,&nbsp;Francis Hornicek ,&nbsp;Brooke Crawford ,&nbsp;H. Thomas Temple","doi":"10.1016/j.jor.2025.01.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Histopathologic assessment of tumor viability has emerged as a potential predictive factor of outcomes in various cancers. This study evaluates the prognostic significance of viability in high-grade soft tissue sarcoma while accounting for different adjuvant regimens and clinical variables.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective chart review was conducted on 147 patients surgically treated for high-grade soft tissue sarcoma between 2010 and 2021 at a single institution. Perioperative, clinical and surveillance data were collected. Tumor viability was determined through histopathologic analysis by a board-certified pathologist.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No significant differences in clinical variables were observed between groups with ≤10 % and &gt;10 % tumor viability. Neoadjuvant treatments, tumor grade, size, and depth did not independently affect tumor viability. There was no statistically decreased risk of local recurrence in the group with ≤10 % viability compared to the group with &gt;10 % viability (HR = 1.19, 95 % CI [0.57,2.50]) (p = 0.64). Margin status was the only variable that significantly increases the risk of LR on multivariate analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This cohort suggests that neoadjuvant radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or their combination did not influence tumor viability predictably. Notably, tumors without neoadjuvant treatment exhibited a high rate of necrosis, potentially confounding the interpretation of treatment effect. Other factors such as tumor type may play a more significant role in the cause of tumor necrosis than originally thought. Pathologic tissue response continues to offer value for the management of STS, but these findings underscore the need for further investigation into tumor viability in soft tissue sarcoma, targeting specific treatments analyzed in large collaborative studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orthopaedics","volume":"68 ","pages":"Pages 7-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking tumor viability as prognostic factor in soft tissue sarcoma\",\"authors\":\"Julien Montreuil ,&nbsp;Eric Kholodovsky ,&nbsp;Moses Markowitz ,&nbsp;Sergio Torralbas Fitz ,&nbsp;Dominic Campano ,&nbsp;J. Erik Geiger ,&nbsp;Francis Hornicek ,&nbsp;Brooke Crawford ,&nbsp;H. Thomas Temple\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jor.2025.01.030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Histopathologic assessment of tumor viability has emerged as a potential predictive factor of outcomes in various cancers. This study evaluates the prognostic significance of viability in high-grade soft tissue sarcoma while accounting for different adjuvant regimens and clinical variables.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective chart review was conducted on 147 patients surgically treated for high-grade soft tissue sarcoma between 2010 and 2021 at a single institution. Perioperative, clinical and surveillance data were collected. Tumor viability was determined through histopathologic analysis by a board-certified pathologist.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No significant differences in clinical variables were observed between groups with ≤10 % and &gt;10 % tumor viability. Neoadjuvant treatments, tumor grade, size, and depth did not independently affect tumor viability. There was no statistically decreased risk of local recurrence in the group with ≤10 % viability compared to the group with &gt;10 % viability (HR = 1.19, 95 % CI [0.57,2.50]) (p = 0.64). Margin status was the only variable that significantly increases the risk of LR on multivariate analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This cohort suggests that neoadjuvant radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or their combination did not influence tumor viability predictably. Notably, tumors without neoadjuvant treatment exhibited a high rate of necrosis, potentially confounding the interpretation of treatment effect. Other factors such as tumor type may play a more significant role in the cause of tumor necrosis than originally thought. Pathologic tissue response continues to offer value for the management of STS, but these findings underscore the need for further investigation into tumor viability in soft tissue sarcoma, targeting specific treatments analyzed in large collaborative studies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"68 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 7-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972978X25000364\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972978X25000364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rethinking tumor viability as prognostic factor in soft tissue sarcoma

Background

Histopathologic assessment of tumor viability has emerged as a potential predictive factor of outcomes in various cancers. This study evaluates the prognostic significance of viability in high-grade soft tissue sarcoma while accounting for different adjuvant regimens and clinical variables.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was conducted on 147 patients surgically treated for high-grade soft tissue sarcoma between 2010 and 2021 at a single institution. Perioperative, clinical and surveillance data were collected. Tumor viability was determined through histopathologic analysis by a board-certified pathologist.

Results

No significant differences in clinical variables were observed between groups with ≤10 % and >10 % tumor viability. Neoadjuvant treatments, tumor grade, size, and depth did not independently affect tumor viability. There was no statistically decreased risk of local recurrence in the group with ≤10 % viability compared to the group with >10 % viability (HR = 1.19, 95 % CI [0.57,2.50]) (p = 0.64). Margin status was the only variable that significantly increases the risk of LR on multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

This cohort suggests that neoadjuvant radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or their combination did not influence tumor viability predictably. Notably, tumors without neoadjuvant treatment exhibited a high rate of necrosis, potentially confounding the interpretation of treatment effect. Other factors such as tumor type may play a more significant role in the cause of tumor necrosis than originally thought. Pathologic tissue response continues to offer value for the management of STS, but these findings underscore the need for further investigation into tumor viability in soft tissue sarcoma, targeting specific treatments analyzed in large collaborative studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
202
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedics aims to be a leading journal in orthopaedics and contribute towards the improvement of quality of orthopedic health care. The journal publishes original research work and review articles related to different aspects of orthopaedics including Arthroplasty, Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, Trauma, Spine and Spinal deformities, Pediatric orthopaedics, limb reconstruction procedures, hand surgery, and orthopaedic oncology. It also publishes articles on continuing education, health-related information, case reports and letters to the editor. It is requested to note that the journal has an international readership and all submissions should be aimed at specifying something about the setting in which the work was conducted. Authors must also provide any specific reasons for the research and also provide an elaborate description of the results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信