{"title":"Fish assemblages in the Kaş-Kekova MPA: A comparative study of Posidonia oceanica meadows, sandy-rocky and rocky habitats","authors":"Ali Ulaş , Onur Karayalı , Nesimi Ozan Veryeri , Zafer Tosunoğlu , Nazli Demirel","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2025.126825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the fish assemblages within the Kaş-Kekova Marine Protected Area (MPA), focusing on the differences among <em>Posidonia oceanica</em> meadows, sandy-rocky and rocky habitats over three consecutive summer periods (2022–2024). We conducted an underwater visual census method to assess fish diversity, density, and the presence of native and non-indigenous fish species across four sampling points. Results indicate that <em>Posidonia</em> meadows support remarkably higher native fish density than other habitats, while number of native fish species were very close to each other among habitats. Evenness (J′) values ranged from 0.47 to 0.63 across different stations and habitats and lowest evenness was observed in <em>Posidonia</em> habitat. Shannon Diversity Index (H′) values ranged from 1.42 to 1.82, and the highest diversity was observed at sandy/rocky area. Our results provide insights into local habitat dynamics, broader surveys encompassing a wider range of habitats and environmental conditions are needed to develop a more comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing fish assemblages and the spread of non-indigenous species within the MPA. Future research should incorporate complementary methodologies, such as remote sensing and environmental DNA (eDNA) monitoring, to provide a more comprehensive understanding of fish community dynamics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54898,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Nature Conservation","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 126825"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Nature Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1617138125000020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fish assemblages in the Kaş-Kekova MPA: A comparative study of Posidonia oceanica meadows, sandy-rocky and rocky habitats
This study investigates the fish assemblages within the Kaş-Kekova Marine Protected Area (MPA), focusing on the differences among Posidonia oceanica meadows, sandy-rocky and rocky habitats over three consecutive summer periods (2022–2024). We conducted an underwater visual census method to assess fish diversity, density, and the presence of native and non-indigenous fish species across four sampling points. Results indicate that Posidonia meadows support remarkably higher native fish density than other habitats, while number of native fish species were very close to each other among habitats. Evenness (J′) values ranged from 0.47 to 0.63 across different stations and habitats and lowest evenness was observed in Posidonia habitat. Shannon Diversity Index (H′) values ranged from 1.42 to 1.82, and the highest diversity was observed at sandy/rocky area. Our results provide insights into local habitat dynamics, broader surveys encompassing a wider range of habitats and environmental conditions are needed to develop a more comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing fish assemblages and the spread of non-indigenous species within the MPA. Future research should incorporate complementary methodologies, such as remote sensing and environmental DNA (eDNA) monitoring, to provide a more comprehensive understanding of fish community dynamics.
期刊介绍:
The Journal for Nature Conservation addresses concepts, methods and techniques for nature conservation. This international and interdisciplinary journal encourages collaboration between scientists and practitioners, including the integration of biodiversity issues with social and economic concepts. Therefore, conceptual, technical and methodological papers, as well as reviews, research papers, and short communications are welcomed from a wide range of disciplines, including theoretical ecology, landscape ecology, restoration ecology, ecological modelling, and others, provided that there is a clear connection and immediate relevance to nature conservation.
Manuscripts without any immediate conservation context, such as inventories, distribution modelling, genetic studies, animal behaviour, plant physiology, will not be considered for this journal; though such data may be useful for conservationists and managers in the future, this is outside of the current scope of the journal.