通过话语和视觉策略的整合来维持合法性:对中国现有清洁能源设施的多模式研究

IF 5.7 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Lingchuan Song , Yan Sun , Xiaofei Gao
{"title":"通过话语和视觉策略的整合来维持合法性:对中国现有清洁能源设施的多模式研究","authors":"Lingchuan Song ,&nbsp;Yan Sun ,&nbsp;Xiaofei Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.eist.2024.100961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While clean energy facilities (CEFs) play a crucial role in advancing the energy transition and in achieving Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 7, incumbents in the clean energy market often face public concerns stemming from wrongdoing and accidents within the industry, prompting them to engage in legitimacy maintenance for their CEFs. We know little about the specific strategies incumbents employ for this purpose. To address this gap, we conducted a qualitative study focusing on the State Power Investment Corporation Limited (SPIC) in China. Our findings extend existing research on organizational legitimacy by revealing five discursive and three visual strategies of legitimation. We further highlight two specific forms of intermodal associations between discursive and visual modes: concurrence and complementarity. Moreover, our study contributes to the energy transition literature by explaining how these discursive and visual strategies benefit incumbents in the clean energy market.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54294,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 100961"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maintaining legitimacy through the integration of discursive and visual strategies: A multimodal study of incumbents’ clean energy facilities in China\",\"authors\":\"Lingchuan Song ,&nbsp;Yan Sun ,&nbsp;Xiaofei Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eist.2024.100961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>While clean energy facilities (CEFs) play a crucial role in advancing the energy transition and in achieving Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 7, incumbents in the clean energy market often face public concerns stemming from wrongdoing and accidents within the industry, prompting them to engage in legitimacy maintenance for their CEFs. We know little about the specific strategies incumbents employ for this purpose. To address this gap, we conducted a qualitative study focusing on the State Power Investment Corporation Limited (SPIC) in China. Our findings extend existing research on organizational legitimacy by revealing five discursive and three visual strategies of legitimation. We further highlight two specific forms of intermodal associations between discursive and visual modes: concurrence and complementarity. Moreover, our study contributes to the energy transition literature by explaining how these discursive and visual strategies benefit incumbents in the clean energy market.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions\",\"volume\":\"55 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100961\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210422424001515\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210422424001515","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然清洁能源设施在推动能源转型和实现可持续发展目标(SDG) 7方面发挥着至关重要的作用,但清洁能源市场的现有企业经常面临行业内不法行为和事故引发的公众担忧,促使他们对其清洁能源设施进行合法性维护。我们对在位企业为此目的采取的具体策略知之甚少。为了解决这一差距,我们对中国国家电力投资有限公司(SPIC)进行了定性研究。我们的研究结果通过揭示合法性的五种话语策略和三种视觉策略扩展了现有的组织合法性研究。我们进一步强调了话语和视觉模式之间的两种特定形式的多式联运关联:并发性和互补性。此外,我们的研究通过解释这些话语和视觉策略如何使清洁能源市场的现任者受益,为能源转型文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Maintaining legitimacy through the integration of discursive and visual strategies: A multimodal study of incumbents’ clean energy facilities in China
While clean energy facilities (CEFs) play a crucial role in advancing the energy transition and in achieving Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 7, incumbents in the clean energy market often face public concerns stemming from wrongdoing and accidents within the industry, prompting them to engage in legitimacy maintenance for their CEFs. We know little about the specific strategies incumbents employ for this purpose. To address this gap, we conducted a qualitative study focusing on the State Power Investment Corporation Limited (SPIC) in China. Our findings extend existing research on organizational legitimacy by revealing five discursive and three visual strategies of legitimation. We further highlight two specific forms of intermodal associations between discursive and visual modes: concurrence and complementarity. Moreover, our study contributes to the energy transition literature by explaining how these discursive and visual strategies benefit incumbents in the clean energy market.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
90
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions serves as a platform for reporting studies on innovations and socio-economic transitions aimed at fostering an environmentally sustainable economy, thereby addressing structural resource scarcity and environmental challenges, particularly those associated with fossil energy use and climate change. The journal focuses on various forms of innovation, including technological, organizational, economic, institutional, and political, as well as economy-wide and sectoral changes in areas such as energy, transport, agriculture, and water management. It endeavors to tackle complex questions concerning social, economic, behavioral-psychological, and political barriers and opportunities, along with their intricate interactions. With a multidisciplinary approach and methodological openness, the journal welcomes contributions from a wide array of disciplines within the social, environmental, and innovation sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信