比较预测ICSI治疗成功的机器学习方法:临床应用研究

Abrar Mohammad , Haneen Awad , Huthaifa I. Ashqar
{"title":"比较预测ICSI治疗成功的机器学习方法:临床应用研究","authors":"Abrar Mohammad ,&nbsp;Haneen Awad ,&nbsp;Huthaifa I. Ashqar","doi":"10.1016/j.ibmed.2025.100204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) is widely used to treat almost all forms of male infertility and to overcome fertilization failure. While ICSI is a powerful procedure, it's also considered quite expensive, which means couples and clinicians have to make informed decisions about whether or not to proceed with this treatment. About 10,036 patient records, 46 attribute sets, and one label column that indicates the success or failure of pregnancy after the ICSI treatment were used to conduct this research. The data were gathered from Razan infertility center in Palestine. The ICSI dataset contains only clinical features that are known prior to deciding on ICSI treatment. The dataset contains 46 features, 5 of the independent features have categorical values, 12 are numerical, 3 are string, and 26 are binary. Based on the results, RF algorithm achieved the highest AUC score of 0.97, followed by the NN with a score of 0.95, and the RIMARC algorithm with a score of 0.92. AUC is a widely used metric for evaluating the performance of binary classification models. Therefore, judging by the AUC scores, it appears that RF algorithm outperformed the other two algorithms in terms of the evaluated metric. The method employed in our analysis demonstrates considerable promise, practicality, and generalizability, driving advancements in fertility treatments and ultimately improving the chances of couples achieving their desired family goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73399,"journal":{"name":"Intelligence-based medicine","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing machine learning approaches for predicting the success of ICSI treatment: A study on clinical applications\",\"authors\":\"Abrar Mohammad ,&nbsp;Haneen Awad ,&nbsp;Huthaifa I. Ashqar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ibmed.2025.100204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) is widely used to treat almost all forms of male infertility and to overcome fertilization failure. While ICSI is a powerful procedure, it's also considered quite expensive, which means couples and clinicians have to make informed decisions about whether or not to proceed with this treatment. About 10,036 patient records, 46 attribute sets, and one label column that indicates the success or failure of pregnancy after the ICSI treatment were used to conduct this research. The data were gathered from Razan infertility center in Palestine. The ICSI dataset contains only clinical features that are known prior to deciding on ICSI treatment. The dataset contains 46 features, 5 of the independent features have categorical values, 12 are numerical, 3 are string, and 26 are binary. Based on the results, RF algorithm achieved the highest AUC score of 0.97, followed by the NN with a score of 0.95, and the RIMARC algorithm with a score of 0.92. AUC is a widely used metric for evaluating the performance of binary classification models. Therefore, judging by the AUC scores, it appears that RF algorithm outperformed the other two algorithms in terms of the evaluated metric. The method employed in our analysis demonstrates considerable promise, practicality, and generalizability, driving advancements in fertility treatments and ultimately improving the chances of couples achieving their desired family goals.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intelligence-based medicine\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intelligence-based medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666521225000079\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligence-based medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666521225000079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)被广泛用于治疗几乎所有形式的男性不育症和克服受精失败。虽然ICSI是一个强大的程序,但也被认为是相当昂贵的,这意味着夫妇和临床医生必须做出明智的决定,是否继续进行这种治疗。本研究使用了约10036例患者记录、46个属性集和1个标记列来表明ICSI治疗后妊娠成功或失败。这些数据来自巴勒斯坦的Razan不孕不育中心。ICSI数据集仅包含在决定ICSI治疗之前已知的临床特征。该数据集包含46个特征,其中5个独立特征具有分类值,12个为数值,3个为字符串,26个为二进制。结果显示,RF算法的AUC得分最高,为0.97,其次是NN算法,得分为0.95,RIMARC算法得分为0.92。AUC是一种广泛用于评估二元分类模型性能的度量。因此,从AUC分数来看,似乎RF算法在评估指标方面优于其他两种算法。在我们的分析中采用的方法显示了相当大的前景,实用性和普遍性,推动了生育治疗的进步,并最终提高了夫妇实现其理想家庭目标的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing machine learning approaches for predicting the success of ICSI treatment: A study on clinical applications
Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) is widely used to treat almost all forms of male infertility and to overcome fertilization failure. While ICSI is a powerful procedure, it's also considered quite expensive, which means couples and clinicians have to make informed decisions about whether or not to proceed with this treatment. About 10,036 patient records, 46 attribute sets, and one label column that indicates the success or failure of pregnancy after the ICSI treatment were used to conduct this research. The data were gathered from Razan infertility center in Palestine. The ICSI dataset contains only clinical features that are known prior to deciding on ICSI treatment. The dataset contains 46 features, 5 of the independent features have categorical values, 12 are numerical, 3 are string, and 26 are binary. Based on the results, RF algorithm achieved the highest AUC score of 0.97, followed by the NN with a score of 0.95, and the RIMARC algorithm with a score of 0.92. AUC is a widely used metric for evaluating the performance of binary classification models. Therefore, judging by the AUC scores, it appears that RF algorithm outperformed the other two algorithms in terms of the evaluated metric. The method employed in our analysis demonstrates considerable promise, practicality, and generalizability, driving advancements in fertility treatments and ultimately improving the chances of couples achieving their desired family goals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Intelligence-based medicine
Intelligence-based medicine Health Informatics
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
187 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信