在MRI图像上使用随机梯度下降优化ResNet50性能,用于阿尔茨海默病分类

Mohamed Amine Mahjoubi , Driss Lamrani , Shawki Saleh , Wassima Moutaouakil , Asmae Ouhmida , Soufiane Hamida , Bouchaib Cherradi , Abdelhadi Raihani
{"title":"在MRI图像上使用随机梯度下降优化ResNet50性能,用于阿尔茨海默病分类","authors":"Mohamed Amine Mahjoubi ,&nbsp;Driss Lamrani ,&nbsp;Shawki Saleh ,&nbsp;Wassima Moutaouakil ,&nbsp;Asmae Ouhmida ,&nbsp;Soufiane Hamida ,&nbsp;Bouchaib Cherradi ,&nbsp;Abdelhadi Raihani","doi":"10.1016/j.ibmed.2025.100219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The field of optimization is focused on the formulation, analysis, and resolution of problems involving the minimization or maximization of functions. A particular subclass of optimization problems, known as empirical risk minimization, involves fitting a model to observed data. These problems play a central role in various areas such as machine learning, statistical modeling, and decision theory, where the objective is to find a model that best approximates underlying patterns in the data by minimizing a specified loss or risk function. In deep learning (DL) systems, various optimization algorithms are utilized with the gradient descent (GD) algorithm being one of the most significant and effective. Research studies have improved the GD algorithm and developed various successful variants, including stochastic gradient descent (SGD) with momentum, AdaGrad, RMSProp, and Adam. This article provides a comparative analysis of these stochastic gradient descent algorithms based on their accuracy, loss, and training time, as well as the loss of each algorithm in generating an optimization solution. Experiments were conducted using Transfer Learning (TL) technique based on the pre-trained ResNet50 base model for image classification, with a focus on stochastic gradient (SG) for performances optimization. The case study in this work is based on a data extract from the Alzheimer's image dataset, which contains four classes such as Mild Demented, Moderate Demented, Non-Demented, and Very Mild Demented. The obtained results with the Adam and SGD momentum optimizers achieved the highest accuracy of 97.66 % and 97.58 %, respectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73399,"journal":{"name":"Intelligence-based medicine","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100219"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing ResNet50 performance using stochastic gradient descent on MRI images for Alzheimer's disease classification\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Amine Mahjoubi ,&nbsp;Driss Lamrani ,&nbsp;Shawki Saleh ,&nbsp;Wassima Moutaouakil ,&nbsp;Asmae Ouhmida ,&nbsp;Soufiane Hamida ,&nbsp;Bouchaib Cherradi ,&nbsp;Abdelhadi Raihani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ibmed.2025.100219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The field of optimization is focused on the formulation, analysis, and resolution of problems involving the minimization or maximization of functions. A particular subclass of optimization problems, known as empirical risk minimization, involves fitting a model to observed data. These problems play a central role in various areas such as machine learning, statistical modeling, and decision theory, where the objective is to find a model that best approximates underlying patterns in the data by minimizing a specified loss or risk function. In deep learning (DL) systems, various optimization algorithms are utilized with the gradient descent (GD) algorithm being one of the most significant and effective. Research studies have improved the GD algorithm and developed various successful variants, including stochastic gradient descent (SGD) with momentum, AdaGrad, RMSProp, and Adam. This article provides a comparative analysis of these stochastic gradient descent algorithms based on their accuracy, loss, and training time, as well as the loss of each algorithm in generating an optimization solution. Experiments were conducted using Transfer Learning (TL) technique based on the pre-trained ResNet50 base model for image classification, with a focus on stochastic gradient (SG) for performances optimization. The case study in this work is based on a data extract from the Alzheimer's image dataset, which contains four classes such as Mild Demented, Moderate Demented, Non-Demented, and Very Mild Demented. The obtained results with the Adam and SGD momentum optimizers achieved the highest accuracy of 97.66 % and 97.58 %, respectively.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intelligence-based medicine\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100219\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intelligence-based medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666521225000225\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligence-based medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666521225000225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

优化领域的重点是制定、分析和解决涉及函数的最小化或最大化的问题。优化问题的一个特殊子类,被称为经验风险最小化,涉及到将模型拟合到观测数据。这些问题在机器学习、统计建模和决策理论等各个领域发挥着核心作用,这些领域的目标是通过最小化指定的损失或风险函数来找到最接近数据中潜在模式的模型。在深度学习(DL)系统中,有各种各样的优化算法,其中梯度下降(GD)算法是最重要和最有效的算法之一。研究改进了GD算法,并开发了各种成功的变体,包括带动量的随机梯度下降(SGD)、AdaGrad、RMSProp和Adam。本文根据这些随机梯度下降算法的精度、损失和训练时间,以及每种算法在生成优化解时的损失,对它们进行了比较分析。基于预训练的ResNet50基模型,采用迁移学习(TL)技术进行图像分类实验,重点采用随机梯度(SG)进行性能优化。本研究的案例研究基于阿尔茨海默病图像数据集的数据提取,该数据集包含轻度痴呆、中度痴呆、非痴呆和极轻度痴呆等四类。使用Adam动量优化器和SGD动量优化器获得的结果准确率最高,分别为97.66%和97.58%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Optimizing ResNet50 performance using stochastic gradient descent on MRI images for Alzheimer's disease classification

Optimizing ResNet50 performance using stochastic gradient descent on MRI images for Alzheimer's disease classification
The field of optimization is focused on the formulation, analysis, and resolution of problems involving the minimization or maximization of functions. A particular subclass of optimization problems, known as empirical risk minimization, involves fitting a model to observed data. These problems play a central role in various areas such as machine learning, statistical modeling, and decision theory, where the objective is to find a model that best approximates underlying patterns in the data by minimizing a specified loss or risk function. In deep learning (DL) systems, various optimization algorithms are utilized with the gradient descent (GD) algorithm being one of the most significant and effective. Research studies have improved the GD algorithm and developed various successful variants, including stochastic gradient descent (SGD) with momentum, AdaGrad, RMSProp, and Adam. This article provides a comparative analysis of these stochastic gradient descent algorithms based on their accuracy, loss, and training time, as well as the loss of each algorithm in generating an optimization solution. Experiments were conducted using Transfer Learning (TL) technique based on the pre-trained ResNet50 base model for image classification, with a focus on stochastic gradient (SG) for performances optimization. The case study in this work is based on a data extract from the Alzheimer's image dataset, which contains four classes such as Mild Demented, Moderate Demented, Non-Demented, and Very Mild Demented. The obtained results with the Adam and SGD momentum optimizers achieved the highest accuracy of 97.66 % and 97.58 %, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Intelligence-based medicine
Intelligence-based medicine Health Informatics
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
187 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信