推导一个简单的风险计算器,用于预测肺间质性疾病引起的肺动脉高压患者的临床恶化

K. El-Kersh , R. Bag , N. Bhatt , C. King , A. Waxman , F. Rischard , H. Kim , D. Cella , E. Shen , SD Nathan
{"title":"推导一个简单的风险计算器,用于预测肺间质性疾病引起的肺动脉高压患者的临床恶化","authors":"K. El-Kersh ,&nbsp;R. Bag ,&nbsp;N. Bhatt ,&nbsp;C. King ,&nbsp;A. Waxman ,&nbsp;F. Rischard ,&nbsp;H. Kim ,&nbsp;D. Cella ,&nbsp;E. Shen ,&nbsp;SD Nathan","doi":"10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Pulmonary hypertension due to interstitial lung disease (ILD-PH) portends very poor clinical outcomes, with a median survival time of 1.5 to 2 years. Currently, there is no tool to assess the risk of clinical worsening in patients with ILD-PH. Our aim was to derive a simple and practical risk calculator that could be used to predict risk of clinical worsening in patients with ILD-PH.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The INCREASE study was a 16-week study that evaluated inhaled treprostinil in patients with ILD-PH. Baseline data from patients who were randomized to the placebo arm (n=163) and thus untreated with any approved pulmonary artery vasodilators were used to derive a risk calculator. The endpoint of interest was the time to clinical worsening. Stepwise regression, Harrell’s c-index, and clinician input were used to derive 2 multivariable Cox PH models from a set of candidate variables. The models were then simplified by applying a point-scoring system to the predictors and refitting with total point score as the covariate. Total point scores were grouped into 3 risk strata (lower, intermediate, and higher).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Two versions of a risk calculator were derived. The first was a non-invasive risk calculator which included NT-proBNP and FVC%/DLCO%, and a second adds cardiac index, an invasive parameter, to the above two parameters. For the total point score models, the estimated c-indices were 0.703 (95% CI: 0.635, 0.783) and 0.683 (95% CI: 0.612, 0.761) for the invasive and non-invasive model, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These two risk calculators provide a simple way to risk stratify ILD-PH patients with clinically useful discrimination. The calculators are easy to employ in clinical practice, since they utilize assessments commonly collected in the care of patients with ILD-PH. Moreover, the calculators can provide clinicians with important prognostic information which can be used to reinforce the benefits of therapy. The risk calculators may also find utility as part of the composite allocation score of ILD-PH patients listed for lung transplant. Future research in this area could include incorporating longer-term outcomes as well as validating the risk models in a separate patient population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100741,"journal":{"name":"JHLT Open","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Derivation of a simple risk calculator for predicting clinical worsening in patients with pulmonary hypertension due to interstitial lung disease\",\"authors\":\"K. El-Kersh ,&nbsp;R. Bag ,&nbsp;N. Bhatt ,&nbsp;C. King ,&nbsp;A. Waxman ,&nbsp;F. Rischard ,&nbsp;H. Kim ,&nbsp;D. Cella ,&nbsp;E. Shen ,&nbsp;SD Nathan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Pulmonary hypertension due to interstitial lung disease (ILD-PH) portends very poor clinical outcomes, with a median survival time of 1.5 to 2 years. Currently, there is no tool to assess the risk of clinical worsening in patients with ILD-PH. Our aim was to derive a simple and practical risk calculator that could be used to predict risk of clinical worsening in patients with ILD-PH.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The INCREASE study was a 16-week study that evaluated inhaled treprostinil in patients with ILD-PH. Baseline data from patients who were randomized to the placebo arm (n=163) and thus untreated with any approved pulmonary artery vasodilators were used to derive a risk calculator. The endpoint of interest was the time to clinical worsening. Stepwise regression, Harrell’s c-index, and clinician input were used to derive 2 multivariable Cox PH models from a set of candidate variables. The models were then simplified by applying a point-scoring system to the predictors and refitting with total point score as the covariate. Total point scores were grouped into 3 risk strata (lower, intermediate, and higher).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Two versions of a risk calculator were derived. The first was a non-invasive risk calculator which included NT-proBNP and FVC%/DLCO%, and a second adds cardiac index, an invasive parameter, to the above two parameters. For the total point score models, the estimated c-indices were 0.703 (95% CI: 0.635, 0.783) and 0.683 (95% CI: 0.612, 0.761) for the invasive and non-invasive model, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These two risk calculators provide a simple way to risk stratify ILD-PH patients with clinically useful discrimination. The calculators are easy to employ in clinical practice, since they utilize assessments commonly collected in the care of patients with ILD-PH. Moreover, the calculators can provide clinicians with important prognostic information which can be used to reinforce the benefits of therapy. The risk calculators may also find utility as part of the composite allocation score of ILD-PH patients listed for lung transplant. Future research in this area could include incorporating longer-term outcomes as well as validating the risk models in a separate patient population.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JHLT Open\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100206\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JHLT Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950133425000011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JHLT Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950133425000011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肺间质性疾病(ILD-PH)引起的肺动脉高压预示着非常差的临床结果,中位生存时间为1.5至2年。目前,还没有工具来评估ILD-PH患者临床恶化的风险。我们的目的是推导一个简单实用的风险计算器,可用于预测ILD-PH患者临床恶化的风险。方法:INCREASE研究是一项为期16周的研究,评估吸入曲前列肽对ILD-PH患者的治疗作用。基线数据来自随机分配到安慰剂组(n=163)的患者,因此未经任何批准的肺动脉血管扩张剂治疗,用于得出风险计算器。关注的终点是临床恶化的时间。采用逐步回归、Harrell’s c指数和临床医生输入,从一组候选变量中推导出2个多变量Cox PH模型。然后通过对预测器应用计分系统并将总分作为协变量进行重新调整来简化模型。总分分为低、中、高3个风险等级。结果导出了两种版本的风险计算器。第一个是无创风险计算器,包括NT-proBNP和FVC%/DLCO%,第二个是在上述两个参数的基础上增加心脏指数,这是一个有创参数。对于总积分模型,有创模型和无创模型的估计c指数分别为0.703 (95% CI: 0.635, 0.783)和0.683 (95% CI: 0.612, 0.761)。结论这两种风险计算方法为ILD-PH患者提供了一种简便的风险分层方法,具有临床应用价值。计算器在临床实践中很容易使用,因为它们利用了在ILD-PH患者护理中通常收集的评估。此外,计算器可以为临床医生提供重要的预后信息,可用于加强治疗的益处。风险计算器也可以作为列出肺移植的ILD-PH患者的综合分配评分的一部分。该领域的未来研究可能包括纳入长期结果以及在单独的患者群体中验证风险模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Derivation of a simple risk calculator for predicting clinical worsening in patients with pulmonary hypertension due to interstitial lung disease

Background

Pulmonary hypertension due to interstitial lung disease (ILD-PH) portends very poor clinical outcomes, with a median survival time of 1.5 to 2 years. Currently, there is no tool to assess the risk of clinical worsening in patients with ILD-PH. Our aim was to derive a simple and practical risk calculator that could be used to predict risk of clinical worsening in patients with ILD-PH.

Methods

The INCREASE study was a 16-week study that evaluated inhaled treprostinil in patients with ILD-PH. Baseline data from patients who were randomized to the placebo arm (n=163) and thus untreated with any approved pulmonary artery vasodilators were used to derive a risk calculator. The endpoint of interest was the time to clinical worsening. Stepwise regression, Harrell’s c-index, and clinician input were used to derive 2 multivariable Cox PH models from a set of candidate variables. The models were then simplified by applying a point-scoring system to the predictors and refitting with total point score as the covariate. Total point scores were grouped into 3 risk strata (lower, intermediate, and higher).

Results

Two versions of a risk calculator were derived. The first was a non-invasive risk calculator which included NT-proBNP and FVC%/DLCO%, and a second adds cardiac index, an invasive parameter, to the above two parameters. For the total point score models, the estimated c-indices were 0.703 (95% CI: 0.635, 0.783) and 0.683 (95% CI: 0.612, 0.761) for the invasive and non-invasive model, respectively.

Conclusion

These two risk calculators provide a simple way to risk stratify ILD-PH patients with clinically useful discrimination. The calculators are easy to employ in clinical practice, since they utilize assessments commonly collected in the care of patients with ILD-PH. Moreover, the calculators can provide clinicians with important prognostic information which can be used to reinforce the benefits of therapy. The risk calculators may also find utility as part of the composite allocation score of ILD-PH patients listed for lung transplant. Future research in this area could include incorporating longer-term outcomes as well as validating the risk models in a separate patient population.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信