为痴呆症患者非正式照护者设计数字健康干预措施的参与式方法。系统回顾

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Anna Messina, Anna Maria Annoni, Rebecca Amati, Beatrice Bano, Giovanni Franscella, Emiliano Albanese, Maddalena Fiordelli
{"title":"为痴呆症患者非正式照护者设计数字健康干预措施的参与式方法。系统回顾","authors":"Anna Messina,&nbsp;Anna Maria Annoni,&nbsp;Rebecca Amati,&nbsp;Beatrice Bano,&nbsp;Giovanni Franscella,&nbsp;Emiliano Albanese,&nbsp;Maddalena Fiordelli","doi":"10.1016/j.invent.2024.100799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>The growing use of technology in healthcare has contributed to the development of digital interventions for informal caregivers of people living with dementia. However, the marked heterogeneity of interventions poses challenges in evaluating their effectiveness. We conducted a review to delineate the distinctive features and development of the interventions, with focus on participatory methods.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched the following databases: Cochrane; Cinahl; Pubmed; Psychinfo; Scopus; Web of Knowledge, and IEEE, and screened and selected studies based on titles, abstracts and full texts. We used standardized procedure to abstract and synthetize relevant data of primary studies, and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool to assess their quality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 3136 records, 20 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most of the studies were web-based interventions, with multiple components and interactive features. The design and development of eight interventions employed participatory methods with large variations in the underlying framework and application.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This review sheds light on the design and development of digital interventions for dementia caregivers. The limited and heterogeneous use of participatory methods, along with inadequate reporting, hinders a clear understanding of intervention efficacy and implementation. Formal standardization of participatory action research methods is necessary to improve the design, development, and evaluation of digital interventions for caregivers of people with dementia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48615,"journal":{"name":"Internet Interventions-The Application of Information Technology in Mental and Behavioural Health","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 100799"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Participatory methods in designing digital health interventions for informal caregivers of people with dementia. A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Anna Messina,&nbsp;Anna Maria Annoni,&nbsp;Rebecca Amati,&nbsp;Beatrice Bano,&nbsp;Giovanni Franscella,&nbsp;Emiliano Albanese,&nbsp;Maddalena Fiordelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.invent.2024.100799\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>The growing use of technology in healthcare has contributed to the development of digital interventions for informal caregivers of people living with dementia. However, the marked heterogeneity of interventions poses challenges in evaluating their effectiveness. We conducted a review to delineate the distinctive features and development of the interventions, with focus on participatory methods.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched the following databases: Cochrane; Cinahl; Pubmed; Psychinfo; Scopus; Web of Knowledge, and IEEE, and screened and selected studies based on titles, abstracts and full texts. We used standardized procedure to abstract and synthetize relevant data of primary studies, and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool to assess their quality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 3136 records, 20 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most of the studies were web-based interventions, with multiple components and interactive features. The design and development of eight interventions employed participatory methods with large variations in the underlying framework and application.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This review sheds light on the design and development of digital interventions for dementia caregivers. The limited and heterogeneous use of participatory methods, along with inadequate reporting, hinders a clear understanding of intervention efficacy and implementation. Formal standardization of participatory action research methods is necessary to improve the design, development, and evaluation of digital interventions for caregivers of people with dementia.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internet Interventions-The Application of Information Technology in Mental and Behavioural Health\",\"volume\":\"39 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100799\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internet Interventions-The Application of Information Technology in Mental and Behavioural Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214782924000927\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Interventions-The Application of Information Technology in Mental and Behavioural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214782924000927","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在医疗保健中越来越多地使用技术,促进了针对痴呆症患者非正式照护者的数字干预措施的发展。然而,干预措施的显著异质性对评估其有效性提出了挑战。我们进行了一项综述,以描述干预措施的特点和发展,重点是参与式方法。方法检索以下数据库:Cochrane;Cinahl;Pubmed;美国医学;斯高帕斯;知识网络和IEEE,并根据标题、摘要和全文筛选和选择研究。我们采用标准化程序对相关初步研究资料进行抽象和综合,并采用混合方法评价工具对其质量进行评价。结果3136篇文献中,20篇符合纳入标准。大多数研究是基于网络的干预,具有多个组成部分和交互功能。八项干预措施的设计和开发采用了参与式方法,在基本框架和应用方面存在很大差异。这篇综述揭示了针对痴呆症护理人员的数字干预措施的设计和开发。参与性方法的有限和不同的使用,以及不充分的报告,阻碍了对干预效果和实施的明确理解。参与式行动研究方法的正式标准化对于改进针对痴呆症患者照护者的数字干预措施的设计、开发和评估是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Participatory methods in designing digital health interventions for informal caregivers of people with dementia. A systematic review

Aims

The growing use of technology in healthcare has contributed to the development of digital interventions for informal caregivers of people living with dementia. However, the marked heterogeneity of interventions poses challenges in evaluating their effectiveness. We conducted a review to delineate the distinctive features and development of the interventions, with focus on participatory methods.

Methods

We searched the following databases: Cochrane; Cinahl; Pubmed; Psychinfo; Scopus; Web of Knowledge, and IEEE, and screened and selected studies based on titles, abstracts and full texts. We used standardized procedure to abstract and synthetize relevant data of primary studies, and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool to assess their quality.

Results

Of 3136 records, 20 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most of the studies were web-based interventions, with multiple components and interactive features. The design and development of eight interventions employed participatory methods with large variations in the underlying framework and application.

Conclusions

This review sheds light on the design and development of digital interventions for dementia caregivers. The limited and heterogeneous use of participatory methods, along with inadequate reporting, hinders a clear understanding of intervention efficacy and implementation. Formal standardization of participatory action research methods is necessary to improve the design, development, and evaluation of digital interventions for caregivers of people with dementia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
9.30%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the European Society for Research on Internet Interventions (ESRII) and the International Society for Research on Internet Interventions (ISRII). The aim of Internet Interventions is to publish scientific, peer-reviewed, high-impact research on Internet interventions and related areas. Internet Interventions welcomes papers on the following subjects: • Intervention studies targeting the promotion of mental health and featuring the Internet and/or technologies using the Internet as an underlying technology, e.g. computers, smartphone devices, tablets, sensors • Implementation and dissemination of Internet interventions • Integration of Internet interventions into existing systems of care • Descriptions of development and deployment infrastructures • Internet intervention methodology and theory papers • Internet-based epidemiology • Descriptions of new Internet-based technologies and experiments with clinical applications • Economics of internet interventions (cost-effectiveness) • Health care policy and Internet interventions • The role of culture in Internet intervention • Internet psychometrics • Ethical issues pertaining to Internet interventions and measurements • Human-computer interaction and usability research with clinical implications • Systematic reviews and meta-analysis on Internet interventions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信