从应用评论中挖掘用户隐私问题

IF 3.7 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Jianzhang Zhang , Jialong Zhou , Jinping Hua , Nan Niu , Chuang Liu
{"title":"从应用评论中挖掘用户隐私问题","authors":"Jianzhang Zhang ,&nbsp;Jialong Zhou ,&nbsp;Jinping Hua ,&nbsp;Nan Niu ,&nbsp;Chuang Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.112355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context:</h3><div>As mobile applications (apps) widely spread throughout our society and daily life, various personal information is constantly demanded by apps in exchange for more intelligent and customized functionality. An increasing number of users are voicing their privacy concerns through app reviews on app stores.</div></div><div><h3>Objective:</h3><div>The main challenge of effectively mining privacy concerns from user reviews lies in that reviews expressing privacy concerns are overridden by a large number of reviews expressing more generic themes and noisy content. In this work, we propose a novel automated approach to overcome that challenge.</div></div><div><h3>Method:</h3><div>Our approach first employs information retrieval and document embeddings to extract candidate privacy reviews in an unsupervised manner, which are further labeled to prepare the annotation dataset. Then, supervised classifiers are trained to automatically identify privacy reviews. Finally, an interpretable topic mining algorithm is designed to detect privacy concern topics contained in the privacy reviews.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>Experimental results show that the best performing document embedding achieves an average precision of 96.80% in the top 100 retrieved candidate privacy reviews, outperforming the taxonomy-based baseline, which achieves 73.87%. All trained privacy review classifiers achieve an <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>F</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> score above 91%, surpassing the keyword-matching baseline by as much as 7.5% and the large language model baseline by up to 2.74%. For detecting privacy concern topics from privacy reviews, our proposed algorithm achieves both better topic coherence and topic diversity than three strong topic modeling baselines, including LDA.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>Empirical evaluation results demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in identifying privacy reviews and detecting user privacy concerns in app reviews.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Systems and Software","volume":"222 ","pages":"Article 112355"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mining user privacy concern topics from app reviews\",\"authors\":\"Jianzhang Zhang ,&nbsp;Jialong Zhou ,&nbsp;Jinping Hua ,&nbsp;Nan Niu ,&nbsp;Chuang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jss.2025.112355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Context:</h3><div>As mobile applications (apps) widely spread throughout our society and daily life, various personal information is constantly demanded by apps in exchange for more intelligent and customized functionality. An increasing number of users are voicing their privacy concerns through app reviews on app stores.</div></div><div><h3>Objective:</h3><div>The main challenge of effectively mining privacy concerns from user reviews lies in that reviews expressing privacy concerns are overridden by a large number of reviews expressing more generic themes and noisy content. In this work, we propose a novel automated approach to overcome that challenge.</div></div><div><h3>Method:</h3><div>Our approach first employs information retrieval and document embeddings to extract candidate privacy reviews in an unsupervised manner, which are further labeled to prepare the annotation dataset. Then, supervised classifiers are trained to automatically identify privacy reviews. Finally, an interpretable topic mining algorithm is designed to detect privacy concern topics contained in the privacy reviews.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>Experimental results show that the best performing document embedding achieves an average precision of 96.80% in the top 100 retrieved candidate privacy reviews, outperforming the taxonomy-based baseline, which achieves 73.87%. All trained privacy review classifiers achieve an <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>F</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> score above 91%, surpassing the keyword-matching baseline by as much as 7.5% and the large language model baseline by up to 2.74%. For detecting privacy concern topics from privacy reviews, our proposed algorithm achieves both better topic coherence and topic diversity than three strong topic modeling baselines, including LDA.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>Empirical evaluation results demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in identifying privacy reviews and detecting user privacy concerns in app reviews.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Systems and Software\",\"volume\":\"222 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112355\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Systems and Software\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121225000238\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Systems and Software","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121225000238","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着移动应用程序(app)在我们的社会和日常生活中广泛传播,各种个人信息不断被应用程序要求,以换取更智能和定制的功能。越来越多的用户通过应用商店的应用评论来表达他们对隐私的担忧。目的:从用户评论中有效挖掘隐私问题的主要挑战在于,表达隐私问题的评论被大量表达更通用主题和嘈杂内容的评论所覆盖。在这项工作中,我们提出了一种新的自动化方法来克服这一挑战。方法:我们的方法首先采用信息检索和文档嵌入,以无监督的方式提取候选隐私评论,并进一步标记以准备注释数据集。然后,训练监督分类器来自动识别隐私评论。最后,设计了一种可解释的主题挖掘算法来检测隐私评论中包含的隐私关注主题。结果:实验结果表明,在检索到的前100个候选隐私评论中,表现最好的文档嵌入平均精度达到96.80%,优于基于分类法的基线的73.87%。所有训练过的隐私审查分类器的F1得分都在91%以上,比关键字匹配基线高出7.5%,比大型语言模型基线高出2.74%。对于从隐私评论中检测隐私关注主题,我们提出的算法比包括LDA在内的三个强主题建模基线具有更好的主题一致性和主题多样性。结论:实证评估结果证明了我们的方法在识别隐私评论和检测应用评论中用户隐私关注方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mining user privacy concern topics from app reviews

Context:

As mobile applications (apps) widely spread throughout our society and daily life, various personal information is constantly demanded by apps in exchange for more intelligent and customized functionality. An increasing number of users are voicing their privacy concerns through app reviews on app stores.

Objective:

The main challenge of effectively mining privacy concerns from user reviews lies in that reviews expressing privacy concerns are overridden by a large number of reviews expressing more generic themes and noisy content. In this work, we propose a novel automated approach to overcome that challenge.

Method:

Our approach first employs information retrieval and document embeddings to extract candidate privacy reviews in an unsupervised manner, which are further labeled to prepare the annotation dataset. Then, supervised classifiers are trained to automatically identify privacy reviews. Finally, an interpretable topic mining algorithm is designed to detect privacy concern topics contained in the privacy reviews.

Results:

Experimental results show that the best performing document embedding achieves an average precision of 96.80% in the top 100 retrieved candidate privacy reviews, outperforming the taxonomy-based baseline, which achieves 73.87%. All trained privacy review classifiers achieve an F1 score above 91%, surpassing the keyword-matching baseline by as much as 7.5% and the large language model baseline by up to 2.74%. For detecting privacy concern topics from privacy reviews, our proposed algorithm achieves both better topic coherence and topic diversity than three strong topic modeling baselines, including LDA.

Conclusion:

Empirical evaluation results demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in identifying privacy reviews and detecting user privacy concerns in app reviews.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Systems and Software
Journal of Systems and Software 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
193
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Systems and Software publishes papers covering all aspects of software engineering and related hardware-software-systems issues. All articles should include a validation of the idea presented, e.g. through case studies, experiments, or systematic comparisons with other approaches already in practice. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: •Methods and tools for, and empirical studies on, software requirements, design, architecture, verification and validation, maintenance and evolution •Agile, model-driven, service-oriented, open source and global software development •Approaches for mobile, multiprocessing, real-time, distributed, cloud-based, dependable and virtualized systems •Human factors and management concerns of software development •Data management and big data issues of software systems •Metrics and evaluation, data mining of software development resources •Business and economic aspects of software development processes The journal welcomes state-of-the-art surveys and reports of practical experience for all of these topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信