机器学习和人工智能企业研究独家数据的使用:对创新和竞争政策的影响

IF 10.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
Seokbeom Kwon , Alan L. Porter
{"title":"机器学习和人工智能企业研究独家数据的使用:对创新和竞争政策的影响","authors":"Seokbeom Kwon ,&nbsp;Alan L. Porter","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Corporate research has been a primary driver of recent advances in Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence (ML/AI). The present study contends that firms' prominent role in advancing the ML/AI research field is partly attributed to their use of exclusive data for ML/AI research. Using data on nearly 8000 preprints of ML/AI research papers archived in arXiv and the performance of their proposed algorithms, we found multifaceted evidence that corporate ML/AI research has exhibited a particularly significant citation impact compared to non-corporate research. Importantly, we showed that the significance of corporate research is more pronounced when it originates from the use of exclusive data. We argue that firms' use of exclusive data has been instrumental in not only encouraging their research on ML/AI, but also enhancing the research impact, which we call the “dual role” of the data in corporate research on ML/AI. In light of the policy concern regarding the potential anticompetitive implications of firms' utilization of data exclusivity in the evolving landscape of ML/AI, our conclusion calls for a comprehensive policy discourse on the consequences of firms' exclusive use of data for their ML/AI research within broader dimensions of societal welfare, including innovation and competition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 102820"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of exclusive data for corporate research on machine learning and artificial intelligence: Implications for innovation and competition policy\",\"authors\":\"Seokbeom Kwon ,&nbsp;Alan L. Porter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102820\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Corporate research has been a primary driver of recent advances in Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence (ML/AI). The present study contends that firms' prominent role in advancing the ML/AI research field is partly attributed to their use of exclusive data for ML/AI research. Using data on nearly 8000 preprints of ML/AI research papers archived in arXiv and the performance of their proposed algorithms, we found multifaceted evidence that corporate ML/AI research has exhibited a particularly significant citation impact compared to non-corporate research. Importantly, we showed that the significance of corporate research is more pronounced when it originates from the use of exclusive data. We argue that firms' use of exclusive data has been instrumental in not only encouraging their research on ML/AI, but also enhancing the research impact, which we call the “dual role” of the data in corporate research on ML/AI. In light of the policy concern regarding the potential anticompetitive implications of firms' utilization of data exclusivity in the evolving landscape of ML/AI, our conclusion calls for a comprehensive policy discourse on the consequences of firms' exclusive use of data for their ML/AI research within broader dimensions of societal welfare, including innovation and competition.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology in Society\",\"volume\":\"81 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102820\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology in Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25000107\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25000107","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

企业研究一直是机器学习和人工智能(ML/AI)最新进展的主要推动力。本研究认为,企业在推进机器学习/人工智能研究领域方面的突出作用部分归因于它们在机器学习/人工智能研究中使用的独家数据。使用arXiv中存档的近8000篇ML/AI研究论文的预印本数据及其提出的算法的性能,我们发现多方面的证据表明,与非企业研究相比,企业ML/AI研究表现出特别显著的引用影响。重要的是,我们表明,企业研究的意义更明显,当它起源于使用独家数据。我们认为,公司使用独家数据不仅有助于鼓励他们对ML/AI的研究,而且还增强了研究影响,我们称之为数据在企业ML/AI研究中的“双重角色”。鉴于对企业在ML/AI不断发展的环境中使用数据独占性的潜在反竞争影响的政策关注,我们的结论要求在更广泛的社会福利维度(包括创新和竞争)内,对企业在ML/AI研究中独家使用数据的后果进行全面的政策论述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of exclusive data for corporate research on machine learning and artificial intelligence: Implications for innovation and competition policy
Corporate research has been a primary driver of recent advances in Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence (ML/AI). The present study contends that firms' prominent role in advancing the ML/AI research field is partly attributed to their use of exclusive data for ML/AI research. Using data on nearly 8000 preprints of ML/AI research papers archived in arXiv and the performance of their proposed algorithms, we found multifaceted evidence that corporate ML/AI research has exhibited a particularly significant citation impact compared to non-corporate research. Importantly, we showed that the significance of corporate research is more pronounced when it originates from the use of exclusive data. We argue that firms' use of exclusive data has been instrumental in not only encouraging their research on ML/AI, but also enhancing the research impact, which we call the “dual role” of the data in corporate research on ML/AI. In light of the policy concern regarding the potential anticompetitive implications of firms' utilization of data exclusivity in the evolving landscape of ML/AI, our conclusion calls for a comprehensive policy discourse on the consequences of firms' exclusive use of data for their ML/AI research within broader dimensions of societal welfare, including innovation and competition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信